Is the NRA partially to blame for the Charlottesville violence?

BS. Moronic statement.

 

So if you don't intend violence against these open carry citizens, what then? Hand out pictures of obese people with guns? That seems to have been one of your arguments here.

 

It is your own definition of what apparently amounts to treason. The fact you regard open carry advocates as being lesser than yourself means that you yourself are currently engaged in treason.

Then exactly what do you intend to do?

Off topic, irrelevant, and in violation of forum rules.

First it will be necessary for you to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the mere sight of a firearm carried openly actually is intimidation.

Now tell us. Exactly what are you going to do if open carry advocates are spotted in your neighborhood? What actions are going to be committed on the part of yourself, that you feel are morally and legally justified? Do not keep repeating that such will be found out, tell us such if you are apparently justified.

 

Which is not actually an answer to the question that was presented. You are big and forthcoming about vague generalities and alluding to the notion of somehow being tough. But when pressed for details as to just what sort of plan of engagement is planned out for such events, there is nothing but silence, and changing the subject.

There is simply nothing that is actually had by yourself. You are devoid of a legitimate position, you are merely engaging in blind hatred for the sake of having something to hate, because it is not possible for yourself to go through life without having something to hate. If it were not open carry advocates, something such as vegetarian cuisine would likely be serving the same role.

 

The ACLU recently discovered video footage of a man firing his handgun at the rally.

"A man attending the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, earlier this month fired his gun in the direction of a black counterprotester who was holding a torch, and police in their vicinity did not seem to respond."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/video-shows-man-shooting-crowd-033820125.html

It could have been a lot worse with all the guns that were present.

 

The so-called torch that was being held, was in reality an improvised flame thrower, created from an aerosol spray can and a lighter, which was being used in a threatening manner against others.



The video clearly shows a jet of flames being exhaled in the direction of others at the seven second mark. That is attempted assault with a deadly weapon.

 

ACLU supports freedom of speech using fire, didn't you know?

 

But it wasn't, Because most gun owners are sensible. BTW, to use your logic, I guess we should ban cars since someone actually used a car to injure 19 people and killed one.