"Jesus was a Black man who was oppressed by White men"

logic would dictate that if anything, the Most High was a so- called Blackman.

 

so which is it? no time to sit on the fence, woolly or not?

 

most Jews were not black. so chances are Jesus was not a black African/Negro.

- - - Updated - - -

The Bible says Jesus had hair that was white as wool.

 

there you go again, confusing jewish ppl with Israel.
Logic would dictate that since The original Man was a so- called Blackman then since the Most High made man in his image then Yah must be so- called black. Besides, can white ppl make black ppl, if not how did black ppl arrive on earth? Are you one of these Nibiru believers who think the so- called blackman is a space man?

- - - Updated - - -

So you believe a gentiles word over Israel in terms of Bible Symbolism?

 

there is no evidence that Adam was black. There is no evidence that Noah was black.

the Bible says that Jesus had hair that was white as wool. It says so in plain English in the Book of Revelation.

 

but logic dictates..

 

More precisely we could say religion is whatever the person wants it to be.

 

lol....you want to apply logic..to the Bible???????????????????



if there is one thing you must get out of this forum, its this: The Bible is not a book of science, but a book of fantasy.

got it?

 

and as far as human evolution and natural selection is concerned, black people could of course evolve from white people....if darker skinned is determined to be advantagous by humans, over tens of thousands of years.

that's how evolution works.

 

His hair was most likely wooly because jews many jews and lebanese people have wooly hair, like tony shalhoub from monk. The bible however makes no such claims that his hair was wooly. It did however say his hair was white as wool which denotes color NOT texture.

- - - Updated - - -

Its not a book of science...at all, but its a book of history, not entirely fantasy. Dr. Neiman, one of the best scholars of this past century stated its the most historically accurate book, and after studying it myself, I would say he is correct.

 

there are many hominids that have white skin under their hair.

that said, its not illogical to assume that the first humans could have been white.

though they could have also been darker skinned, as their thick coat of hair went away their exposed skin may have become darker due to natural selection.

however it is currently impossible to determine the skin color of the first homo sapiens.

he may have been lighter skinned, he may have been darker skinned.

but as far as the Bible telling us, such a suggestion is absurd as the Bible is a book of myth, especially when it comes to the origin of the Universe and mankind.

as far as I am concerned the Bible only begins to have some truth to it around the time of Abraham.

 

ok, thats a milestone, we can agree with. So let us not backtrack and begin to claim he didnt have woolly hair.

- - - Updated - - -

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

cherrypicking at its finest.

 

All I said was that the Bible says he has white hair. Maybe he was albino?

 

well, there is no historic evidence of Jacob, Isaac, Joseph ever existing either.

there is no historic evidence of Moses.

perhaps we can start considering the Bible to be historically relevent with David, as we know he existed.

 

unlikely.

 

considering the indigenous ppl of all the earth, besides the northern hemisphere, are so- called black ppl its not a stretch to suggest that the original man/woman [of the fertile crescent, the cradle] were so- called black. anything else is skepticism. youre entiltled to that. in other words, to go against this theory is to suggest that the bible is, for want of a better word, afrocentric.

 

you have no scientific evidence that the first human beings had black skin.

not even the Bible says this.

all you have is bigoted & unintelligent speculation from a racist cult, known as the Black Hebrew Israelites.

 

Or moorish science lol

But Jonah, with all due respect, do you believe the arameans were black? Or just the hebrews?

 

it goes without saying really.

- - - Updated - - -

doesnt matter what I believe

 

that's not evidence, just ignorant & biased speculation.

I think the first homo sapien had purple skin, can you prove me wrong?

 

Very mature.

Its ok to deny the out of africa theory, it is after all a theory.

 

I don't deny the Out of Africa theory.

But its ignorant and baseless to assume that the first homo sapiens had black skin just cause they came from northeastern Africa, hundreds of thousands of years ago.

The climate of northeastern Africa back then may have been very different than today, with much more trees. Plus the fact that we know that many hominids have white skin under their hair.

 

Israel wasnt around hundreds of thousands of years ago though, we were talking about Israel remember, lets not forget that.

 

no, we are now talking about the first human being. you posted about this, saying that the first man was black.

 

before you derailed it this was the post.