Kirk Cameron proved the existence of God in debate with Atheists.

Doesnt really say too much for the stock you come from does it?

your belief...
Many would say that what is on a mans lips isnt always what is in his heart....Just look at davinci for proof of that statement.

The only ones i see showing anger are christians and catholics...gee bud for a supposedly "smart" guy you really are showing your dumb side..
I have goals and vision bud, i also have the drive to reach em. I have no need of an imaginary friend unlike some dumbasses.

 

Better explanation than " god " did it....

Religion is a crutch for the weak minded. Your fear based doctrine has no place in todays world, hense it is dying out.

 

The banana was created by people selectively breeding banana plants.

YOU LOSE.

 

I'm just going to ignore your other posts.


Summary:

Atheists. A space cloud created planets and all living things...

Christians. A GOD created all living things...

You think a cloud can do all that? Now who's stupid?


Can a space cloud think?

 

Banana plants with bananas were here before. So you lose.

 

yea, but not those type of bananas that u buy in todays supermarket..

YOU LOSE!!

 

Sorry, the banana in the Banana Man vid was created by people through selective breeding of banana plants. This is why the vid is so popular among atheists, because it demonstrated how stupid Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort are.

Learn then post.

 

They are still bananas. Not talking about different types of bananas. Stop it with this nonsense.

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kD1ShqtSug"]Cuties Are Made for Kids: Small - YouTube[/ame]

lol

The Clementine was developed in Algeria by Father Clement Rodier, a French missionary. It is a hybrid of the tangerine and the Seville orange (bitter orange).

One can argue that god guided this hybrid to our shores and now they are called cuties. Or its simple as a man made these little guys

 

Sorry, natural bananas are not very edible at all.

I guess the pineapple isn't supposed to be eaten? Or apples? They're harder to eat than bananas.

This is where the logic used in that vid just falls to pieces.

 

So if they had an ORIGINAL breed or type of Banana, they would have proved their point? You tell me, where can I get the original banana then. I am sure there is not much difference in size and color. show me the proof or ****

 

Oh how well made it looks. Look how easily it fits in the human hand. Look how it's designed to fit the human mouth (gives banana a blow job).

 

Stop this nonsense. The idea is that GOD created fruits in our size, compared to our bodies. I don't care about hybrids or giant pumpkins or anything like that. Fruit was created for human compsumption. Atheists cannot disprove that ok.

 

Well, look at that. You've proved my point. The banana was designed to be eaten, to fit in our mouth and in our hand. So the wild banana is closer to the creation god wanted.

 

Wiki: "They are considered inedible because of the seeds they contain." Source

They were probably eaten one way or another, but it is hardly convenient.

 

God created man as an intelligent creature..

Consider that our ancient ancestors figured out how to build the pyramids....

Maybe we are designed to question and THINK.

 

And consider that the first ones were stupid .
And so bored God and his pals -- Gabriel , Michael , Lucifer et al ----that he tinkered with them , thus denying free will .
Or , sent Captain Pong from Planet Ping to interbreed .
Or , had a row with Lucifer , told him he was training the Humans in a match to the death to outwit him .
Or , produced automatons with various implanted deliberate faults to give the heavenly mob an interesting spare time game to watch
Or , produced Matter and Anti Matter universes to see which finally triumphed
Or ,
Or ,

 

Hi, I'm fairly convinced that I've heard all the arguments people make for the existence of god before so I don't feel inclined to fritter half an hour of my life away watching videos on the topic. Any chance you could do me a favour and write down what you think is the best argument in those videos so I can read it in ten seconds and see whether there's anything new in there? Thanks.

 

If you saw a pothole filled with water in the road would you assume that the pothole was created with that specific shape, depth, and composition to hold that exact amount of water?

Or would you assume that the water conformed to the shape of the pothole?

 

Back that claim up with evidence.

 

Why does it have to?

 

God created evolution.

 

Proved your point? Was your point that you will take any dumb crap and say it proves God?

 

​

But the LORD told him, "You may eat fruit from any tree in the garden, except the one that has the power to let you know the difference between right and wrong. If you eat any fruit from that tree, you will die before the day is over!" Genesis 2:16-17​

 

And of course, If something can not be disproven, it must be true. For instance, the fact that there is a tea kettle in orbit around the sun, somewhere between Venus and Earth.

Similarly there can be no alternate explanations of why fruit seems to be of a convenient size for humans, such as the fact that we evolved in a niche in which fruit was an available source of nutrition. Or the fact that fruits come in a wide variety of sizes, some of which ought to be convinient by chance. Or the fact that hand sized food isn't necessarily all that convenient, when compared, for instance, to bite sized food. I wish god had considered creating bite sized apples with no cores. He also should have designed some fruits that were appropriately sized for elephants, because obviously the elephants have nothing to eat in the wild. I'm partial to watermelon, which god was not inclined to produce in a convenient size. I'm also partial to meat, which also generally doesn't come in a convenient size, except, I suppose, in supermarkets, which I of course am greatful to god for inventing.

For that matter, god made fruit perfect, and mankind hasn't been able to improve on it with GE/selective breeding at all.