Liberals use political correctness as de facto censorship.

And the Alliance Defending Freedom, the Family Research Council.

 

MLK jr. Believed in a day when people would be judged based on the content of their character, rather than their race. But affirmative action judges people based on their race.

People can either believe people should be judged based on their race as per. Affirmative Action or they can believe what MLK jr. believed, that people should not be judged based on their race but on the content of their character.

But it cannot be both.

It has to be one or the other.

The two beliefs are incompatible.

It has to be the one or the other.

In terms of reparations, would the descendants of white male union soldiers also get reparations for fighting, dying, and being permanently injured physically and mentally to end slavery?

In terms of criminal justice, it's unconstitutional to sentence people based on their race.

Nonetheless, African Americans receive 10% longer sentences than White people when they commit the same crimes.

 

Charles Murray.

 

Only Black soldiers, both for the Union and the Confederacy. Because they are black.

 

I said the number of blacks who perform and behave as well as most whites is less than the number of blacks who are criminals, welfare recipients, and academic failures.

 

Anti racists tried to get Professor J. Philippe Rushton fired from his academic position. After he died and was unable to defend himself they said this about him:

The Department of Psychology at Western University refutes and disavows the research of Philippe Rushton, and condems the continued harm caused by it.
https://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/race_evolution_behavior.pdf

Statement from the Department of Psychology regarding research conducted by Dr. J. Philippe Rushton. Approved at a department meeting held 22 June 2020.

John Philippe ("Phil") Rushton was a faculty member in the Department of Psychology from 1977 until his death in 2012.

Although Rushton published on a variety of topics in the field of personality and individual differences, much of his research was racist, and attempted to find differences in intelligence between racialized groups and to explain them as caused by genetic differences between races.

Although Rushton ceased teaching for the Department of Psychology in the early 1990s, he continued to conduct racist and flawed studies, sometimes without appropriate ethics approval [1], for two more decades. There are other ethical concerns surrounding Rushton’s research. In particular, much of this research was supported by the Pioneer Fund, a foundation formed in 1937 to promote eugenicist and racist goals. The fund was headed by Rushton himself for many years (2002-2012). Indeed, Rushton was the largest recipient of Pioneer Fund grants at the time of his death [2]. Further, he directed funding from this foundation to editors of some of the journals in which he published. Rushton also created an offshore private promotional organization called the Charles Darwin Institute to promote his writings [3].

In addition to ethical concerns about the nature and funding of his research, Rushton’s work is deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint. Crucially, Rushton’s works linking race and intelligence are based on an incorrect assumption that fuels systemic racism, the notion that racialized groups are concordant with patterns of human ancestry and genetic population structure. This idea is rejected by analysis of the human genome: racialized groups are not distinct genetic populations [4]. What Rushton described as “races” are socially created categories that do not reflect patterns of human inheritance or genetic population structure. In an effort to explain putative differences in parental care between racialized groups, Rushton also inappropriately applied an ecological theory developed to explain differences between species’ reproductive strategies (r/K selection theory), an approach that has since been thoroughly debunked (e.g. [5,6]). Moreover, Rushton’s work is characterized by a complete misunderstanding of population genetic measures, including fundamental misconceptions about the nature of heritability [7] and gene-environment interactions during development. His work has been criticized, often by other Western University faculty members [e.g., 7,8], on many other grounds. In some cases, Rushton’s work has failed to replicate or stand up to reanalysis [e.g., 9,10]. In other cases, his papers ignored alternative explanations or competing evidence that did not support his racist hypotheses [8].

Despite its deeply flawed assumptions and methodologies, Rushton’s work and other so-called “race science” (currently under the pseudonym of “race realism”) continues to be misused by white supremacists and promoted by eugenic organizations. Thus, Rushton’s legacy shows that the impact of flawed science lingers on, even after qualified scholars have condemned its scientific integrity. Academic freedom and freedom of expression are critical to free scientific inquiry. However, the notion of academic freedom is disrespected and abused when it is used to promote the dissemination of racist and discriminatory concepts. Scientists have an obligation to society to speak loudly and actively in opposition of such abuse.
https://psychology.uwo.ca/people/faculty/remembrance/rushton.html

Calling anyone a racist is name calling.

The Pioneer Fund has been associated with the Nazis. This is an example of the guilt by association fallacy. The Pioneer Fund never endorsed the Nazis.

This attack on Professor Rushton repeats the cliche that "Race is only a social construct."

In his essay "The Inequality Taboo" Charles Murray refuted that cliche. Murray mentioned an experiment in which 3,636 people were asked to identify their race. They they were asked to contribute a tissue sample for DNA testing. The scientists testing the tissue samples agreed with the races the people said they belonged to 99/9% of the time. This experiment has been repeated several times with the same results.

http://www.iapsych.com/wj3ewok/LinkedDocuments/Murray2005.pdf

Professor J. Philippe Rushton carefully documented his assertions. Read his essay "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," and judge for yourself.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

 

We've already been over this racist propaganda. 68% of Blacks are working class and above. They are not criminals or on welfare. Academic failure is subjective, but the high school drop out rate for Blacks is 6.2%, whites 5.2% and Hispanics 8.6%. Facts are important to some.

 

Believed in a day when people would be judged based on the content of their character, rather than their race.
Right-wingers love that line, but the problem is we haven't reached that day, as demonstrated here and by you.

 

Percent of welfare recipients who are white: 38.8%
Percent of welfare recipients who are black: 39.8%
https://www.lowincome.org/2016/04/truth-about-welfare-foodstamps-how-many-blacks-vs-whites.html

Because there are many more whites in the United States than blacks, a much higher percentage of blacks are welfare recipients.

 

Okay? And their poverty rate is twice whites.....your point?
Your statement remains false.

 

You are picking at straws. By every objective, measurable criterion Negroes are considerably less intelligent than whites. They have a murder rate eight times the white rate, and an illegitimacy rate two and a half the white rate.

 

The majority of juvenile delinquents and adult prisoners grew up in female-headed households. The rate at which black children are born into unmarried homes in the U.S. has gone from a quarter to three quarters. 72 percent of African American children are fatherless. There are more black children living without biological fathers in the home than children who do.

Fatherless children are much more likely to suffer physical abuse, including sexual abuse, because of the men their mothers bring home.

 

That is why the government should stop subsidizing illegitimacy with welfare checks, unless single mothers submit to sterilization. .

 

Efforts were made to deprive Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton of their professorial positions.

 

The correlation is obvious to anyone with the courage to look.

 

You have now been corrected twice for the false statememt "the number of blacks who perform and behave as well as most whites is less than the number of blacks who are criminals, welfare recipients, and academic failures" and you will probably continue to repeat it elsewhere. It is an integrity or blind partisanship issue.

You seem to be basing your world view on a test. A test that doesn't really measure intelligence. It measures how well you have prepared to take the test. Some cultures do that well, others not. I brought up the example of Nepal earlier with an average IQ of 46. You would believe it is a country of the moderately retarded. That's absurd, but you must believe it or your belief system is false.

Your heroes falsely assume it is genetic without proof. They are widely criticized by the scientific community because you have correlation for an unproved causation that they base their theories on, but the racists accept it as gospel, because it fits their bias and cry about "suppression".

 

During the last century IQ tests have developed a solid record of accurately predicting academic and economic success. Intelligent parents tend to have intelligent children. Stupid parents tend to have stupid children. Genes for intelligence have been discovered. More are being discovered.

The only reason any of that is controversial is because of taboos and sanctions against discussing it.

 

Banning a race from a public institution violates the 14 amendments equal protection clause.

The same clause used to desegregate schools in the South in the 1960's.

 

Voltaire Wouldn't.

 

The standard deviation of women's intelligence is smaller than the standard deviation of men's intelligence. (If you ever want to freak out a liberal tell them that. They freak out-HaHa.

How do you know Elephants are less intelligent than human beings???

Source Please.

Human beings may not even be the smartest animals on Earth.

Octopi can change their color and texture in real time as they move across their environment and they can shape shift.

I saw a video of an Octopus changing its shape to look like a cluster of shells and it really did look like a cluster of shells.

Can Human Beings change their color and texture as they move across their environments as well as shape shift to look like another organism???

Octopi may not have accomplished as much as human beings because they have no tactile fingers and apposable thumbs.

Think that's trite???

The very first piece of technology created by Hominids was the hand axe.

It's basically just a rock fashioned to have a sharp edge.by rasping it with another rock.

You cannot fashion or use a hand axe without tactile fingers and apposable thumbs.

You probably couldn't build a space shuttle either.

 

Off Hand, I would say I probably agree with that argument, but so many people on the left are as racist and sexist as you know what.

For example, if you were to ask a liberal if they agreed the suffering of white males is just as important as the suffering of anyone else chances are they would laugh at you.

They laugh because it's a ridiculous notion to them.

It's like asking a NAZI if they believed the suffering of Jews is just as important as the suffering of anyone else, and indeed, liberals use white males the same way the NAZIS used the Jews, as the scapegoats for everything.

 

If you say something that is true, but not politically correct are you racist.

 

If you say so. I can think of many things which are true, and not PC, and have nothing to do with race.

 

Those poor suffering white males. Or maybe its just a niche of white males who feel they are being abused for who they are. I would guess they are racist right-wingers. They have lost their status in society. The world is leaving them behind and they are losing power. The racial hierarchy is being chipped away. Blacks gaining political power and minority voices demanding to be heard and be taken seriously. It all leads to a siege mentality for this shrinking niche of white males and so they suffer.

 

Are you currently or have you ever been a member of the NAZI party???

Anyway, forget all that.

I want to see the IQ test taking elephants.

Truthfully, it sounds absurd.

I have never even heard of, let alone seen, IQ test taking elephants.

Source.