Do you spend a lot of time worrying about this sort of stuff? Do you spend a lot of time watching emasculating she woman manhater stuff? I hope you are aware of how this might turn out for you:
There's actually a cabal of feminists working to make that a reality. They want to keep 10 percent of men, though, as a, "slave class."
Actually, I do. I'm an Equalitarian and civil rights activist working for equality for everyone regardless of race and gender. I'm also a Feminist.
And an award winning molecular biologist.... Seems to me that you're living a schtick paradigm from the Helen Ready era bro....
I think it's funny that you were calling me a "liberal". I just thought the poll was a joke and I don't live my life by what women or anyone else think. Of course men have a right to their opinion like anyone else. Just like anybody else, they can voice that opinion but everyone has to face the consequences of voicing that opinion. Usually that means that you have to put up with those that want to challenge your opinion. Some opinions are best kept to yourself. That's what spawned my "It's a trap!" meme.
I don't know about award winning, but I came up with an idea for a technique, to build a tool, to solve template switching in retroviral vectors. Theoretically, if we can solve template switching in retroviral vectors we could solve every genetic disease caused by a single gene. One of them being breast cancer.
Many people implicitly. In particular, many women and men believe that men are moral inferiors of women. Having extensively studied the issue since 1996, I came to different conclusion. To summarize: The main reason why men are viewed as morally inferior gender is because the vast majority of men lack vindictiveness. If men were vindictive, then those who make generalizations about men would have been cancelled. Thus, men would not have had reputation of moral inferiors.
Speaking of titties, Meghan Trainor has some nice ones. Right! Huba, Huba... Look at those knockers!!!
How do you know it's Molecular Biology, and it's not genocidal. It would hurt no one, including men. They would simple just no longer exist
Truthfully, it's not about the money, it's about the extinction of human kind. I'm just not impressed with human kind. I was watching this show with clips with three hosts and an audience. In one clip, an 8 eightish year old girl was on a glacier. She fell through a hole in the ice. The clip was long enough that you could see her mother run after her, frantic. The audience laughed hysterically. Making one sex extinct would eventually lead to the extinction of both sexes-which is the end game. But Feminists have such a rabid hatred of men they're blinded by their hate and they fail to realize the extinction of men would lead to the extinction of women-just like aborting only male fetuses. And it's not genocide. No one would be killed. They simply would just no longer exist, like the Irish Elk.
It's not genocidal. Nobody would be harmed. Men would simply just no longer exist as per Feminist wishes. Let me explain in a rough outline: The technology exists today to make men extinct without harming any organism on Earth-including men. The technique is remarkable for its simplicity. Using a method called CRISPR/cas 9, any gene can be deleted, in this case there is a gene on the Y-chromosome called the SRY gene. The SRY gene results in male differentiation at about two weeks gestation, without it no males would be born. The SRY gene could be cut out of the Y-chromosome using CRISPR/cas 9. Then the cells natural repair mechanisms would use the gene on the X-chromosome at that locus as a template to repair the damage. In other words, you would have the exact same gene at that locus on both chromosomes and the organism would have no other option but to inherit that gene and be born Female. Eventually, no Males would exist.
That still sounds rather dead end short of all women would have to use IVF as well as some kind of artificial sperm to put another women's egg's DNA half in, so that reproduction can continue after all the males are gone.
Mansplaining is a term that refers to when a man with minimal knowledge on a subject poorly/incorrectly explains something about the subject to a woman who is actually knowledgeable on the subject and condescendingly tries to give her advice assuming she knows nothing about it because she's a woman. Classic example would be that guy in the gym who doesn't even squat deep enough himself trying to tell the powerlifter woman how to do squats. Does the term get misused and abused by certain self-righteous women? Yes.
