McCarthy to green light Biden impeachment inquiry this week

Again I just posted the evidence your denials are entirely specious.

 

Not really. You posted one liners from journals that claim a Chinese government connections without offering evidence. In order to make a claim, one needs to provide evidence for that claim.

 

Whatever it was he and The Big Guy did for the Chinese whom I already named and he was threatening if they didn't pay up in the message that has already been cited.

 

Yes really try refuting it this time. And you are free to go the links to read more even thought LOTS more has already been posted and you simply deny it. Go read the reports from the House committee they go into great detail.

How about you simply explaining why the Biden's were receiving all these tens of millions of dollars from the Chinese, and you know the Chinese's government is up the arse of every large Chinese corporation stop with the fallacious denials.

 

So you can't state what Hunter did.
You can't connect Hunter's alleged actions to Joe.
You can't decide if it was allegedly for a Chinese company or the government of China.

You really got yourself a rock solid case there !

 

Yes. An article claiming biden is linked to the Chinese government without explaining how is refuting it.

The fact that you believe the Chinese government is linked to every Chinese corporation is not an argument you want to make because that directly implicates our previous president.

 

Not totally true.. However, in order to make a claim anybody takes seriously, one should consider doing that...

 

That's true. I meant to say if one says there is irrefutable proof like the poster keeps saying.

I'm wondering why if the evidence is in plain view, why republicans are waiting to impeach. If they know Biden is guilty and are ignoring it, they are just as guilty.

 

Here's an excellent (I.E. brief) summary of where this bogus impeachment investigation stands today... Some of it is unintentionally hilarious...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/comer-impeachment-pursuit-runs-steam-103001530.html

I hadn't considered this, but Eisen makes the case any subpoenas (Hunter and James) would fail to be allowed in a court proceeding.... Interesting read

 

So what happened? They had all the evidence! lol

 

They predictably **** the bed. LOL

 

You must have more evidence than the GOP house does lol

 

This will be just another distraction. If they had the evidence they would have used it long ago. They have nothing, but keeping these lies in the public sphere serves political purpose. Thats all this is is more Kabuki Theatre.

But make no mistake, they need to keep this alive until september and they are doing everything they can to do that right now. Remember, this all started when joe first got elected, and here we are 3+ years later, and they are still telling us "just wait till we show you the evidence we have"......you mena the evidence you've had for 3 years ?

 

This impeachment shows what Republicans support today.

They are burning our tax dollars on garbage like calling a convict to testify, only to find out that he's got nothing but lies. What a shock!!

Comer and Jordon aren't just blatant liars, the are actually morons.

 

He has a “mountain of evidence” at his disposal!

 

You’ve got me convinced! Biden is baaaad and icky!

 

43 Pages littered with embarrassing anti-Biden posts (which aged horribly)?

Whew! That was a close one!
Joe was lucky to escape the gurney...

 

Seems like some forum Trump supporters will have to find a new hobby.

 

And the truly ironic thing about this whole 'impeachment' effort is that even IF the plain truth had ever been revealed about Joe Biden rather obviously being "Big Guy" -- the 'godfather' of an influence-peddling racket -- it would not (NOT) have qualified for an Article of Impeachment, because the allegation would have concerned activities he engaged in while he was an out-of-office PRIVATE CITIZEN!

Hint: Joe Biden didn't become President of the United States until noon on January 20, 2021....

 

"Joe Biden rather obviously being "Big Guy"
^Lolwut?

There is NO PROOF (and certainly not "obviously") that Joe was the "Big Guy"...
Hunter never "admitted" Joe was the "Big Guy" ! Period!
All he said was THIS:
“I truly don’t know what the hell that James was talking about,” the first son said when asked about the reference, according to a transcript released Thursday.
Hunter NEVER admitted that Joe was the "Big Guy"...
(And, nobody with any credibiity (who can actually be believed) has claimed that Joe was the "Big Guy").
Thx for playing, though...
Better luck, next time...

 

Reality is that impeachment is not a judicial process. It is a political one. No crime necessary. No evidence necessary. All that is required is enough votes in the House. We should all have learned that by now. I think they abandoned this, not because they don't think Biden did what they say he did, but rather because it would never be convicted so is a waste of time and energy. There was probably some political pressure involved as well. Biden's guilt of corruption is clear. The evidence is compelling but circumstantial. The correct approach is to beat him or whomever might replace him in the election. After that they can try to change corruption into crimes.

 

Obviously, it was a waste of time and money...
BUT, in this case the GOP pulled the plug to spare themselves the embarrssment of not even getting a simple majority to further their delusions...

NO, it isn't! Dream on...

And, as EVERYBODY KNOWS, "circumstantial" = NO PROOF! Next...

Totally,.
Trump is most likely heading to a 538-0 Sweep in the EC...
Uncle Joe, we hardly knew ye...

 

That’s a great article and common sense analysis so lacking in the Trumper narrative.

 

We should get them all stamp collections.

 

Shall we no longer take you seriously?