Media Won’t Link White House Shooter to Occupy Wall Street

Dude, every time you trot out that kind of stuff, we are going to "remind" you of who this guy really was.


Jared Loughner, Alleged Shooter in Gabrielle Giffords Attack, Described by Classmate as "Left-Wing Pothead"

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2011/01/jared_loughner_alleged_shooter.php


_

 

I have debated this ad nauseum. I know more about Jared Loughner than pretty much anyone on this site to be sure.

Jared Loughner believed women had no place in politics. He hated women. He did not take political dictation from them... and he was NOT right wing.

 

Jared Loughner was not at all interested in the Tea Party.

Jared Loughner waited his whole life for OWS... and if he were free today he would be at Occupy Tucson.

Jared Loughner was not really left OR right, though he certainly leaned left. Jared Loughner was one of YOU. Obsessed with conspiracy theories.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread649091/pg1
I expect you will recognize the site where he did most of his work online.

Here is his youtube page.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10

Jared Loughner is the 99%

 

Some leftist morons still try and trot out the Big Lie to indict the
right and the Tea Party. It's vital to remind them every time that we see right through that lie. Why should we believe anything they say when their lies are so transparent and easy to debunk? Good work, Don.

 

yes you do , this just proves there are bad people in all walks of life

 

Think about it..

The OWs are camping and living in the street and they ar coming from all over NYC and elsewhere.

Homeless people would naturally be drawn to them..

 

(*)(*)(*)(*) you show me.

Show me what the homeless have done. The homeless are pretty good at not going to jail. Hospitals? Yeah... all over it... jail? Not where they wanna be.

 

NYC.. has over 30,000 homeless, many of whom are children and single mothers... but other homeless really are on the street as opposed to shelters and many are mentally ill who live by panhandling and petty theft.

Of course they would gravitate to the OW campers.

 

Why do you defend Obamaville with "majority of" comments? And then try to say they are like the TEA party who don't say "majority of", they say "ALL of". There is no grayness between illegal and legal. Only you libs try to justify your actions with "well, only some in my party that I am hanging out with killed, or raped, or drugged up, or want to collapse the entire system. But that is not all of us, just SOME of us." Sad really that you put up with rapist and murderers just to get your way.

 

Nobody is suggesting they aren't at OWS. You are suggesting they are committing the crime.

You accuse me of blaming the whole of OWS for the actions of a few, by blaming the group of homeless for the actions of none.

I suggest you tack at this point and try another direction.

 

But those of OWS know who the homeless are and kick them out of the food tent because they provide nothing to the movement...Gee, where have I heard that before?

 

Did you not notice the poster you linked to says it is a call for "non-violent" action?

 

Unlike Sarah Palin's poster that put gun crosshairs over her list of enemies' place of residence...and had scores of tea-baggers showing up at her rallies armed with loaded sidearms.

 

Did you notice the Obamavillians have called for violence? Even the "mayors" and "organizers" of Obamavilles have called for violence. This is a CYA attempt to say "officially" there was no violence recomended.

This is a total contradiction though, if there are no leaders of the movement, then this poster means nothing. If all the Obamavillians are "equal" in leadership, then when one person goes violent, then the movement is violent. If you admit there is a leader that can control the masses, then you have proven that this was never grass roots and that your "direct democracy" never worked cause there has yet to be a vote for the leader of Obamaville.

 

Do you really want to go into partisan calls for violence? I mean really, Obama beats Sarah hands down on that aspect. Remember it was Obama that told latinos to "punish their enemies". This could be his words coming to bite him in the ass.

Also, bringing a loaded gun to a rally doesn't mean you are looking for violence. It might look like violence to those that are violent. Those that would burn and hang effigies of others (aka the left are the violent ones). The right has always believed in the right to protect ones self. Now don't you wish the women that were raped at OWS had a gun to protect themselves?

 

I don't think so. Look at Sarah's poster carefully:


When Caribou Barbie said "let's take back the 20 together" and "let's make a stand", next to gunsights over the hometowns of the people on her "list", with no other explanation of what "let's make a stand" or "take back the 20" meant, such as a recall election or mailing or phone campaign...complete with her cohorts at Fox encouraging "2nd Amedment [guns] remedies" for political grievances...what conclusion would Mr. Loughner come to other than "I'll go get a gun and shoot Gabby Giffords because she's on an officially-sanctioned hit-list of people I don't like"? How are people with minds like Loughner supposed to differentiate when no other direction was given or encouraged besides "2nd amendment remedies" and gun crosshairs?

Hmmm... their leaders post "hit lists" on political websites, complete with gun crosshairs over the places where the "hits" live. Then people show up at those leader's rallies with loaded sidearms.

Now, imagine if say, Michael Moore had a website for OWS. And on that website he had a poster of a number of republican senators and congresspeople with encouragement to "take them down". And on that poster he had placed gun crosshairs over the places where these officials lived.

The imagine that OWS protestors started showing up in droves with loaded sidearms at Michael Moore et al's rallies?

The national guard would be there in a nanosecond mowing people down with submachine guns.


Nothing like a "fair and balanced" democracy eh? Industry thugs can flash loaded heat at insidiously violent rallies but hippies can't bang on their bongos outside Wallstreet without getting shot in the head with a tear gas canister.

 

Why wont they? Because he has no connection to them. He is your average, run of the mill religious psycho. If you want to blast a group, blast the Christians.

Why doesn't the media look at all the people who have caused religious crimes in this country and ask what the worth of religion is? Maybe because it is obvious to anyone with a brain that a mentally unstable person who goes to church and misinterprets the message does not hold any bearing over the whole of Christianity. The same holds true with OWS.

 

So true unfortunately.

 

Yet the protests will still continue. This isn't some milk-toast love-in from the 60s...people's backs are to the wall and have lost or are going to lose everything.

Beware of a pack of dogs that have lost everything and have their backs to the wall..they're not going to go away anytime soon.

The trick is to throw them a bone.

Suggestions:

1. Raise taxes on the rich in the interim to get us out of the hole we're in.

2. POTUS expands the CDC to cover all basic healthcare [he doesn't need Congressional approval to do this.

3. Dissolve NAFTA, impose heavy tariffs on goods returning to the States for sale and bring manufacturers/jobs back to the US without having to worry about costs for providing health insurance for workers.

While the 99% are gnawing on those bones, they won't be bothering anyone anymore. All they want is a job and basic healthcare. What a bunch of losers eh?

The trick is not to reanimate the reasons for Bastille day in July..

 

So, you want to go into it huh? How about you show the origional "targeted map" that the democrat put up before Palin? Or do you just want to be a lying POS on purpose?

Well, if you want to see all the violent things Obama has said against ALL conservatives, I guess we can show you how dense you are.

** Obama: “They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
** Obama to His Followers: “Get in Their Faces!”
** Obama on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
** Obama to His Mercenary Army: “Hit Back Twice As Hard”
** Obama on the private sector: “We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
** Obama to voters: Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
** Obama to lib supporters: “It’s time to Fight for it.”
** Obama to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
** Obama to democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”

They are. They live in Obamaville in each city. Their guns were rounded up when they got evicted from Obamaville.

Wow, that is outlandish and hyperbolish. Although, liberals are the ones that actually commit violence more than conservatives. Remember that little civil war they started where the liberal north attacked the conservative south for evicting tresspassers on their property?

Funny though, the NG doesn't have submachine guns.

Funny thing is, the later was breaking the law by infringing on other peoples right, while the former were actually peaceful and didn't desturb anyone but the sell out incombant politicians. But you want to keep calling up as down, and black as white, and throw in the sky being green on a clear sunny day just for good measure. Well, have fun, I am done with your trollingness.

 

Name how many deaths have been contributed to Christianity. Bet you can't come close to the Athiest Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot with a total of 60 million.

 

See any similarities to "Battleground" states? War terminology and imagery was not born of Palin, no matter how bad an idea that poster was. It is a common "meme"... and is as old as politics.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-11-03/swing-states-poll-obama/51062622/1


To make the drastic leap in logic that this mentally deranged conspiracist who hated women was influenced by Palin is sad and desperate.

He is an infowars abovetopsecret alex jones no moon landing nutjob.

He is your people. You wanna point fingers, use a mirror.

 

Please do not lie. He was a liberal. There is zero evidence he was ever in the tea party or attended a single tea party rally

 

Except that he stalked and shot a DEMOCRAT [a member of his own political leanings???] in disgruntlement about government. And most crazed uberwhite skinheads I know are pretty much leaning to the right of tree-huggers and Obama voters...

The square peg still isnt' fitting in the round hole, no matter how hard you try to shove it in there.. People aren't stupid. They know how to add things up.

 

San Diego Occupy holds a moment of silence for the white house shooter who is a member of OccupyDC.

Check the video