Milo Yiannopoulos disinvited from CPAC slot amid tape controversy

You really should check your facts before you post.

I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim.

So yes he is a victim exactly according to him.

https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851826321621931

Can you quote anything he has said that is racist or is this just another bloviation with no factual evidence?

 

Your homophobia is noted. Can't have no libertarian gays. It is bad for bidness.

 

So you're defending his 'right' to promote child molesting?

 

If you say so.

- - - Updated - - -

The third option.

You shoudl watch the video. His apology rings a bit hollow after his bolstering.

 

This kind of logic is why you lost.

 

What did I lose? I voted for Trump.

 

I'm all about free speech, but CPAC did good here.

 

The OP suggests you lost your ratiocination.

 

Good word. I had to look that up.

 

If CPAC rioted at a location where Milo was invited to speak, forcing a cancellation through violence, they would be violating free speech. Otherwise they are free to invite or disinvite anybody they please because it is their event.

 

These people have no shame. Milo is a sterling character in the new Trumplandia.

 

He was a couple days ago. The man for whom Trumps stood up for, who threatened to withhold government funding unless he was heard........

 

So you can't admit even when its quoted that he is a child abuse victim.

And you can't quote anything racist he said despite your claim.

Got it. Thanks.

 

If you say so.

 

Yesterday's neocon darling turns out to be today's POS.

There seems to be a trend forming.

 

This is very normal for gays. Don't ask me why (maybe someone here can fill us in), and I don't remotely condone it, it's totally creepy and perverse. But it's not illegal if the "young man" is above the of consent, although it does reek of abuse and paedophilia. I know a old gay bloke who's been banging younger men all his life. I've sometimes wondered if he'd be better off castrated.

Anyway, MY is a wilful provocateur. It's part of his stage act. He's also sharp as a razor, and when he's not on provoke tilt he talks bucket loads of sense.

 

Your silence did that.

 

I think you're making this up. Which "right wing thought police" have "disowned" him?

 

You have precedent supporting you as well. Harvey Milk and Liberace both took in under age lovers and the gay community sponsored Milk for a stamp here in the US.

 

I know! I saw VP Pense and others wearing all black and throwing barriers through windows then looting. I saw riots ensue! I saw armed law enforcement having to spray the crowd of conservatives with pepper spray before they began looting.

Do you think there might be an important point you missed?
How about the organizers - not random public - came to the conclusion he was not in line with conservative thinking. Since the focus of the summit is conservatism...

 

So, a homosexual jew who has black boy friends is a racist bigot. Only in the faux liberal mind. He looked like a Nazi when his hair was blond. So, he is also a jewish hitler, obviously.

Faux liberals need to wear t shirts or caps that identifies them. So we will not ever ask them for directions.

But the establishment conservatives were desperate for an excuse to take away the invite. They do not think like trump. And milo is after all very queer.

 

Milo has single-handedly opened the door to the idea that every gay perverted Jewish immigrant doesn't have to be a Leftist.

 

he's bigoted against Muslims

 

Milo, a racial bigot? Hardly.
The fact is, the media really does not know this man or his views enough to state them fairly. And they do not care to find out because the way he sets up falls into their agenda as it is. So the media is surely, and once again, not one to learn the truth from.

99% of Americans have zero idea who Milo is and who the real Milo is. So he will continue to be maligned.

But Milo is this >>> He is gay. He is Catholic. He is socially and economically conservative. He has a little "jewishness" in his heritage and he is surely not anti-semitic. He is very controversial or inflammatory in his deliveries. He upsets a lot of snowflakes and a lot stuffed shirt conservatives. He is crude, rude, filthy, and so on. Quite funny often enough. He is extremely effective debating anyone willing to debate him, of which there are very few. He is less endearing as a speech give but still a welcome voice.

He is not a bigot nor a racist nor a xenophobe. He is just wise. He is far and away against the gay agenda. He wishes gayness upon no one. He is dead against their viral protests and against their adoption of children. He is major anti-feminist, and with good reason. And he is very much against Islam and all its crazy or evil ways. Milo is a welcome voice in this sick world.

.

 

Anyway, I smell a rat:

I'll go out on a limb here: he advocated nothing illegal. He took the subject of typical gay sexual behaviour and ran with it alla his usual self. Conservative prudishness on the subject of homosexuality led them into some kind of a kneejerk reaction.

And guess what? We don't even know what he said, LOL. All this is based on a...wait for it...press report.

Yeah, they'd never make anything up.