Mind-Blowing Liberal Hypocrisy

All your link did was cite and abstract

 

Those democratic party leaders were just being good little woke, virtue signaling, political opportunists, grandstanding in a carefully orchestrated photo op, compete with culturally appropriated props.

 

What?

 

"Antifa aren't a terrorist organisation."

They might not be a, rigidly defined, organization, but they definitely are terrorists.

 

Ironically real libertarianism is left wing and anarchist in its perspective. I appreciate, mind you, that Trump may have forgotten to communicate that to the herd.

 

Research is published in research journal. Bit obvious really. If you need information that isn't in the abstract, and haven't heard of the concept of a library (admittedly they haven't done well under austerity), happy to fill in any methodological gaps.

 

In summary, we have numerous groups only linked by anti-fascism, but you know that they are terrorists. Your post would benefit from: "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength"

 

Anyone can call themselves "anti-fascist". Doesn't make it true though.

 

Yep, anyone can call themselves libertarian. Doesn't make it true though.

 

I agree.

So then why are we just supposed to pretend that "antifa" are "anti-fascist" simply because that's what they're calling themselves?

 

There is something very different here. There is no reason to call yourself anti fascist if you aren't anti fascist. Libertarian, in contrast, is a term corrupted by right wingers to justify tacit support for big business.

The real "I'm anti fascist, honest" fibbers are those believing Trump's bobbins, using that to justify support for his authoritarianism...

 

Don't try to be cute. If you're going to try to cite a link as proof or facts, to back up some point you're arguing, then cite a link which provides your proof. Don't simply point to a book and cliam yoor proof might be in there somewhere, and expect that take the place of you actually engaging in an intelligent debate.

 

I will continue to do best practice and refer directly to the primary research. If you don't think that's appropriate then let me just 'tut'

 

They care more!

 

Well, well, well... what do we have here? Looks like another example of mind-blowing liberal hypocrisy from the most revolting hag in government, Nancy Pelosi, caught inside a San Fran hair salon without a mask:



Naturally, crazy Nancy refuses to take responsibility for her actions, choosing instead to blame someone else. In this case, the salon owner whose business Nancy helped to destroy with draconian regulations. Because clearly the salon owner forced nasty Nancy to set up an appointment and to not wear a mask. It was all a big conspiracy. Probably Putin had a hand in it as well.

 

Of course, Nasty Nancy isn't the only liberal breaking the rules she's attempting to force on others.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot of Chicago also was also caught violating asinine "social distancing" rules in order to get her haircut.

Her excuse? She's the face of Chicago. And what a face!

 

Wow! Does the liberal hypocrisy ever end? Ruth Bader Ginsburg was caught officiating a wedding with no mask!



So millions of regular Americans cannot get haircuts or have weddings but elite liberals like Pelosi, Lightfoot, and Ginsburg are allowed to do whatever they want.

 

Is your state still shutdown completely? I didn't think there were any states still doing this. I, unfortunately, live in one of the most liberal states but we've been open for some time now. Even during the height of the close down we could still go outside our homes with no issue at all.

 

It would appear that there is no end in sight, ar least.

 

I'm so glad we have people out there who have time to worry about stuff like this. This may be the best issue that Republicans have to run on. Law & Order doesn't appear to be a winner.

 

Why can’t millions of Americans get haircuts? I’ve been getting haircuts for months and I, unfortunately, live in one of the most liberal states in the country.

 

Pelosi's response to this was sickening, truly sickening. It clearly demonstrates the mind sets of these petty benevolent dictators that control government.

 

No State was ever shutdown "completely".

But they did place unprecedented and draconian blanket restrictions on basic freedoms, like freedom of association, freedom of religion, freedom of movement and free trade.

And not only was this totalitarian strategy a massive practical failure on almost every single front, buttressed by endless lies and fraud, it was a quantum leap towards the kind of nightmarish authoritarianism you read about in books like 1984.

 

Dude... do you seriously have no awareness at all?

LIBERALS are the ones who "worry about stuff like this".

LIBERALS are the ones who want everyone to "wear a mask" or "stay home" or "keep your social distance".

I'm merely pointing out the HYPOCRISY of LIBERALS. I do not "worry" about any of the healthcare theater that LIBERALS have imposed on society. I think it's all STUPID.

And if you think for one second that normal people will not see stuff like this and feel angry or confused, then you must be completely out of touch with normal society.

Nobody likes a hypocrite. Nobody likes to be told what to do by someone who doesn't even follow their own rules.

So when normal people see a picture of a prominent liberal like Ginsberg officiating a wedding without a mask, they are going to ask themselves: Why is she allowed to go to a wedding but I'm not? Why is she allowed to go around without a mask and I'm not?

And I will be there to give them the answer: Because hypocrisy is baked into the elitist ideology of modern liberalism.