My 2006, 2008, 2016 and 2004 campaign writings as ART.

DennisTate · Jun 5, 2018

I taught English as a second language in Quito, Ecuador for over a year and one of the reasons why I decided to campaign for public office two years after returning home to Nova Scotia, Canada was to give my Ecuadorian students some English - Spanish..... side by side..... writings that would test......... and hopefully expand their understanding of written English.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pictou_Centre

Nova Scotia general election, 2006
Party Candidate Votes % ±

Progressive Conservative Pat Dunn .....3,901 .....52.60

New Democratic Party Danny MacGillivray .....2,344 .....31.61

Liberal Troy MacCulloch .....1,057 .....14.25

Green Samuel M. Clark .....93 .....1.25 –

Independent Dennis Tate .....20 .....0.27
Click to expand...

My name is Dennis Tate. I lived most of my forty seven years in West Lochiel Lake, Guysborough County. I am running for MLA as an independent in the area of Pictou Centre so that I can help as many people as possible become more aware of what I am sure is the real reason why our roads are in disrepair, why hospital beds are unused, why so many of the rural schools have been shut down, why our soldiers in Afghanistan are poorly equipped and why many if not most of our young people may have to leave Nova Scotia to find jobs.

When well trained workers have high quality technology to work with then the total of all wages and benefits paid out to employees is only a fraction of the retail value of the products they produce. As a result of this fact the only way to move products out of warehouses is to extend higher and higher levels of credit. One problem with an abundance of red ink is that compound interest on all this government, business and personal debt over a period of decades will grow to astronomical levels. At this time there is approximately TEN TIMES as much debt in Canada as there is money. A simple explanation for how this happened can be seen here:
The Public-Debt Problem

In my opinion this rather simple mathematical problem is perhaps the number one cause of inflation in the Canadian economy over the past three decades. This is also perhaps the number one reason why our costs of production are so high and Canadian products cannot compete on the world markets as well as they could under better conditions.

From 1940 to 1970 the Government of Canada put roughly half of the total money supply into the economy through loans issued through the federally owned Bank of Canada. Provincial and municipal governments could borrow the money to build roads, schools, hospitals and sewage treatment facilities at zero or one percent interest. In 1970 we changed our system and since that time a higher and higher percentage of all government debt is financed through loans issued through privately owned banks. At this time it is ninety eight percent. This policy may be great for our banking sector but it was estimated that in the one year of 1995 alone our federal government could have saved roughly SIXTY FIVE BILLION DOLLARS in interest payments if we had gone back to creating half the total money supply through these low interest rate loans issued through the bank that is OWNED BY ALL CANADIANS.

Considering that our deficit was approximately thirty billion dollars for that year, simply by changing back to an already proven monetary and banking system, we could theoretically have had a FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS OF THIRTY FIVE BILLION DOLLARS in 1995.

The massive cutbacks in the Canadian military, in health care, highway construction, social programs and education were profoundly affected by these accounting practices?

So what can you and I do about this problem?
1. If we will do our homework and study this question we can put pressure on our provincial level politicians to create a provincially owned bank. A true Bank of Nova Scotia owned by all Nova Scotians could be used to finance town and municipal government projects at zero or one percent interest just as The Bank of Canada used to do.

2. Town and municipal government officials in New Glasgow, Stellarton and Trenton should seriously consider creating a local currency unit such as has been done in Ithaca, New York.
http://www .ithacahours. org/directory.php
This is a great way to promote local businesses and help sustain rural economies.

3. It is also possible for groups of concerned individuals to get together and organize a local barter exchange as a cooperative. Mr. Rob Assels has been instrumental in just such an initiative in the Tatamagouche and River John area so surely we can get similar organizations up and running here in New Glasgow, Pictou, Stellarton, Trenton and Westville. Here is a link into the Halifax LETS system:
halifaxlets.com/

Let's discuss the various options available on the Pictou County Portal Message board. If you have trouble using this technology maybe you could hire a young person to help you get started?
...pcconnects. ca/portal/c/portal/layout

I just completed the first year of the Information Technology Program at Stellarton Campus of NSCC. I am running in Pictou Centre because I know that the towns of New Glasgow, Stellarton and Trenton have the people, the industrial base and the technological capability to become powerhouses of job creation not only for this area but also for all the surrounding regions.

"The wealth that is in the city comes from the countryside."
Creating new jobs in New Glasgow, Stellarton, and Trenton will ultimately depend on job creation in the surrounding rural areas.

Thank you immensely for taking the time to consider these points. By deciding to vote for me on June 13 you will be sending a clear message to the various political parties that you want them to take a serious look at these flaws in our monetary system and at these possible remedies. From now on if a politician tells you that they have to close down a school because of budgetary restraints, you may know far more about what is really happening than they do.

Warmest regards,

Dennis Tate
Click to expand...

CORRECTION... The year 1970 in red......in this statement should have been 1974:
...."In 1970 we changed our system and since that time a higher and higher percentage of all government debt is financed through loans issued through privately owned banks." (From paragraph #4)

I was hoping that getting into flaws in Canadian central banking policy would
give my students a better understanding of how economists and bureaucrats and political leaders were deliberately dampening the Canadian and world economy..........
that fact has some benefits and some serious drawbacks as well.

One of the positives is that deliberately dampening the economy.... and decreasing optimism... .tends to be a good thing for the environment.

As you can see from the Wikipedia link.... .I did get twenty votes...... which I was pleasantly surprised by.... because educating voters was my primary objective.

drluggit · Jun 5, 2018

DennisTate said: ↑

One of the positives is that deliberately dampening the economy.... and decreasing optimism... .tends to be a good thing for the environment.
Click to expand...

You sound like a Malthusian. I suppose that it never occurred to you that "damping" economic output also irrevocably damages people and their livelihoods? But hey, the "environment" is better? Laughable.

DennisTate · Jun 5, 2018

Here is my 2008 primary campaign writing:

We can STOP GLOBAL WARMING and we can keep our school!

September 15, 2008

Dear residents of Indian Harbour Lake, Sonora and Wine Harbour: I am campaigning for the office of Municipal Councilor for St. Mary's District 4.

There are three primary threats to the quality of life for all of us who live here. High unemployment will probably force most of our young people to move far away to find jobs. Because of government cut backs St. Mary's Educational Centre may be closed as early as 2011. In the near future record high tides may devastate our roads and homes that are only a few feet above sea level. We are being told that there is little that you and I can do about any of these problems but this is simply not true.

Satellite pictures show rapid melting of Arctic ice but only about ten percent is above water level. Ice occupies more space than liquid water so until now we have experienced rather little ocean level rise. Our situation will be entirely different if and when melting occurs in the massive ice pack on Greenland and Antarctica that sit on land.

I am in agreement with environmentalist and economist Bjorn Lomborg that a carbon shift policy will probably be ineffective over the short term in combating global temperature increases or in preventing a destructive rise in world ocean levels.

"Bjorn Lomborg argues that many of the elaborate and expensive actions now being considered to stop global warming will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, are often based on emotional rather than strictly scientific assumptions, and may very well have little impact on the world's temperature for hundreds of years." (lomborg.com/coolit/)

Two effective methods to combat global warming and simultaneously fight rising ocean levels have been proposed by New Mexico biologist Carl Cantrell.

"So how is our problem of continental drying causing global warming? It all has to do with vegetation and sunlight. When sun light hits a plant, it causes a process which we call photosynthesis where the energy from the sun light creates oxygen for us to breathe, water for us to drink, and is stored as sugar for plants and animals to use. When the same sun light hits the soil, all of its energy turns into heat and is radiated back into the atmosphere.. ."

"Therefore, the less vegetation you have on the planet, the more sunlight is being turned into heat and the warmer the planet becomes...."

"Just take a look at any satellite picture of the earth showing heat and you will see that our deserts are the warmest spots on the planet by far. More heat is being generated by just one of the top four or five deserts than by all of our cities combined.... "

"The truth is that you can do more to decrease global warming by just reducing the average temperature for the Sahara Desert by one or two degrees than if we humans completely quit using fossil fuels and returned to the cave…."

"So, how would you start working to resolve this problem? Easy, cool the deserts and get some vegetation growing on them as soon as possible. But the method is much more complex than that. You have to use the prevailing trade winds in relation to the deserts to get the best results as quickly as possible and it will be extremely expensive…."

"Then we build desalination plants along the coast near these water sheds and pipe water to the tops or ridges of the water sheds…"

"We need to start working on this as soon as possible because, if the planet reaches a point to where it is warming faster than our technology can possibly stop or reverse this warming trend, then our planet is lost and all life will cease to exist on this planet within a relatively short period of time. We will need to start with the largest and hottest deserts because cooling them will have the greatest benefit in the least time (Global Warming II by biologist Carl Cantrell)."
Click to expand...

Another promising method to green the deserts is to use hydrogen fuel cell technology to power vehicles in the hottest and driest regions of the earth. Imagine millions of vehicles across the Sahara, the Middle East, near the US Mojave desert and in the outback of Australia all spewing harmless water vapor as exhaust! Rest assured humidity and rainfall will increase in those areas and vegetation will grow.

Last week I wrote a lengthy e-mail to Green Party Leader Elizabeth May. "Ms. May, if you owned a large apartment building and your tenants complained that the rooms were too warm would you listen to the advice of the contractor who was telling you to rip all the insulation out of the walls of this structure?"

"I don't think that you would because your article indicates that you have a phenomenal intellect and listening to this probably self-interested contractor would be incredibly unwise!"

"Combating global warming by first getting rid of CO2 is comparable to tearing the insulation out of this hypothetical building. CO2 is not a pollutant. Plants love this compound and some people even seem to feel that the recent greening in some parts of the Sahara Desert is partly attributable to increased levels of CO2. I tend to strongly agree with them in this assertion."

"Several days ago Mr. Charles Moore informed me that Canada produces roughly only 2.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. Our nation could invest billions of dollars into reducing our carbon footprint and yet all this would have essentially zero effect on the global environment if China and India did not take similar measures.... besides....CO2 IS NOT A POLLUTANT... PLANTS LIVE ON IT AND RISING WORLD OCEAN LEVELS ARE ALMOST CERTAINLY THE GREATEST MOST IMMEDIATE THREAT POSED BY GLOBAL WARMING TO EVERY COASTAL COMMUNITY!!!!!!!!! (E-mail, September 11, 200

Ms. May deserves credit for encouraging Canadian political leaders to take environmental issues more seriously but at this time I feel that she has far too much confidence in the proposals put forward at Kyoto. The skepticism that Prime Minister Harper had for this accord seems to have been based on sound reasoning. Liberal Leader Stephane Dion was wise to hope for more time to further study this complex subject before an election.

You would be astonished how many of our political leaders do not understand the tremendous benefits of historical Canadian monetary policy.
The Bank of Canada Must Finance our Country, Debt-Free Say Three Economists

"Why was a much larger national debt shrugged off in 1945, while today's much smaller debt (as a percentage of GDP) is being used as an excuse to let the economy stagnate?"

"The answer can be found at the Bank of Canada. During the war, and for 30 years afterward, the government could borrow what it needed at low rates of interest, because the government's own bank produced up to half of all the new money. That forced the private banks to keep their interest rates low, too.

"Since the mid-1970s, however, the Bank of Canada, with government consent, has been creating less and less of the new money, while letting the private banks create more and more. Today «our» bank creates a mere 2% of each year's new money supply, while allowing the private banks to gouge the government — and of course you and me, as well — with outrageously high interest rates. And it is these extortionate interest charges that are the principal cause of the rapid escalation of the national debt. If the federal government were paying interest at the average levels that prevailed from the 1930s to the mid-1970s, it would now be running an operating surplus of about $13 billion!"
Click to expand...

.....

"Clearly the current problem of the Canadian government's deficit is not its absolute size, or its size relative to the GDP, but the insane way it is being financed. A return to the policies of the World War II era, when the Bank of Canada produced almost one-half of the new money at near-zero interest, would do wonders for the economy, while greatly shrinking the deficit... The first order of business for a post-Mulroney- era government must be to regain effective control of the Bank of Canada and make it the primary source of money creation.

"It is ludicrous for the government to put billions of dollars into circulation by borrowing from the private banks, when it can create the extra money it needs, virtually free. "(by Harold Chorney, John Hotson, and Mario Seccareccia) .
Click to expand...

We can encourage our federal and provincial level officials to re-enact wise monetary policy such as Prime Minister Mackenzie King did in 1940 by organizing a local film production cooperatives or company. Due to our proximity to the ocean we should all be highly motivated to produce films and effectively use the media to educate individuals and politicians all across Canada through YouTube.com. Time is limited if we hope to stimulate our economy, save our elementary school and prevent the loss of our roads and homes to the threat of rising ocean levels.

We have been told that we are almost helpless before these massive problems but what did the author of Genesis say about human capability for either evil or good if we unite on a common goal:

"And the LORD said, Behold, the people [is] one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do."Genesis 11)

Can we visualize extensively using hydrogen fuel cell cars in California, Nevada, New Mexico, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Australia and Kuwait?
"And the parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water." (Isaiah 35)

Please also take a look at my campaign writings from 2004 and 2006:
www.bankingsystemflaws.blogspot.com/

If you elect me as your Municipal Councillor on October 18 I will try my best to promote effective solutions to our greatest problems to all who will listen.

Thank you for your considering of this information and for your support.

Kind regards.

Dennis Tate
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jun 5, 2018

drluggit said: ↑

You sound like a Malthusian. I suppose that it never occurred to you that "damping" economic output also irrevocably damages people and their livelihoods? But hey, the "environment" is better? Laughable.
Click to expand...

Thank you for introducing me to that word........
I had to Google it......

Malthusianism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while the growth of the food supply is linear. It derives from the political and economic thought of the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus, as laid out in his 1798 writings, An Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus believed there were two types of "checks" that in all times and places kept population growth in line with the growth of the food supply: "preventive checks", such as moral restraints (abstinence, delayed marriage until finances become balanced), and restricting marriage against persons suffering poverty or perceived as defective, and "positive checks", which lead to premature death: disease, starvation, war, resulting in what is called a Malthusian catastrophe. The catastrophe would return population to a lower, more "sustainable", level.[1][2] Malthusianism has been linked to a variety of political and social movements, but almost always refers to advocates of population control.
Click to expand...

Actually my wife and I could have been termed part of the working poor at the time of my first and second campaign writings......
and my primary objective was to let people know that they had the power to put pressure on government to
crank up the economy..........
loosen up the money supply..... in order to accomplish many worthwhile infrastructure projects........
and perhaps to even introduce a Minimum Basic Income.... without
increasing the tax burden on citizens.

But....... I have to admit that I did understand the reasoning behind why some people who think of themselves as
the Elite.....would tend to favour a tighter money supply........
partly to protect the environment?!

Did P. M. Pierre Elliott Trudeau save the world environment?

DennisTate said: ↑

This is actually a quite serious question.

P. M. Trudeau made an error back in 1974, that may well come to be understood as one of the most important mistakes ever made by a political leader.

When P. M. Pierre Elliott Trudeau took Canada off the gold standard, (which incidentally had to be done for many valid reasons), a miscalculation was made that is the number one reason why our national debt has spiraled out of control.

But..... there is a very good side to this because all of us know that we humans have been in a somewhat similar mentality to our ancestors who shot, boiled, barbecued, roasted and fried passenger pigeons into extinction.

We are highly prone to OVER Consumptionism............. I addressed part of the background issues back in my 2006 provincial level campaign as an independent.

www.BankingSystemFlaws.blogspot.ca/

.......
Click to expand...

Personally..... I do NOT agree with what P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau did.... but.....
I had to admit that it may have had some advantages...... at least for the environment.

By deliberately dampening the Canadian economy....... P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau allowed the USA Federal Reserve to also..... .dampen the USA economy... which led to a general slow down of the entire world economy!

https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/social-credit/item/the-public-debt-problem?/plenty34.htm

DennisTate · Jun 5, 2018

Here is my 2016 municipal campaign writing:

Dennis Tate
September 19, 2016

I want this campaign to be win - win - win for all of us and on that note my opponent, Ms. D..... F......, has gotten several positive comments that she did a good job and worked very hard on Sherbrooke Village Old Fashioned Christmas events over these past several years.

One of the major reasons why I decided to campaign for the office of Municipal Councillor for St. Mary's District #1, Sherbrooke, was to attempt to find five or more volunteers willing to give their time to attempt to set up some sort of St. Mary's District Volunteerism Hour or Dollar, similar to Tamworth Hours or Calgary Dollars.

During the Great Depression, Irving Fischer Ph. D. visited the town of Worgl, Austria that had initiated a local currency as an experiment. Previous to this there had been mass unemployment and 4/5 local factories had closed down. In only six weeks unemployment in Worgl virtually disappeared.

"Inspired by his vision, hundreds of communities began issuing their own currency, and by 1934 there were over 1,000 local communities using ‘scrip’ throughout the U.S.

Every one of these communities experienced a tremendous rejuvenation of their local economies. They thrived while others suffered. Fisher then met with President Franklin D. Roosevelt, proposing the implementation of government-sanctioned local ‘scrip’ in every community in America. When FDR consulted with his top financial advisors and bankers, however, he was advised to shut all the ‘scrip’ systems down, which he did. Instead, he borrowed large amounts of money from bankers, at interest, and used it to pay for the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and the other work-creation projects, which collectively came to be known as the ‘New Deal.’" (Francis and Lia Ayley, whatcomwatch .org)
Click to expand...

I believe that Sherbrooke has the talented and skilled personnel needed to organize a successful modern application of the Worgl Local Currency Experiment right here.

Thank you for considering this option.

Dennis Tate
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jun 5, 2018

My 2004 Municipal campaign writing is kind of funny...... because it was ten pages long.....
and I concentrated far too much on USA history to grab the attention of Canadian voters:

Dennis Tate
September 28, 2004.

A BIG THANK YOU TO EVERYBODY IN SHERBROOKE, STILLWATER, SONORA, JORDANVILLE AND GOLDENVILLE!

You’ve made my first venture into politics extremely enjoyable. The conversations with many of you have been very encouraging and you can rest assured that I plan to make lots of noise on your behalf over the coming months and years regardless of the outcome of the election on October 16.

I also thank all of you who took the time to place comments in the message board that I started to discuss possible ways to stimulate our local economy.

As I have told many of you, the reason why I am running for the office of Municipal Councillor is because I believe that Canada had a much better monetary and banking system in the past and that we must force our provincial and federal politicians to abandon our present banking system and utilize the taxation and monetary system visualized by the men who drafted the original Canadian Constitution.

Many of you are already aware that our federal government is forbidden by our Constitution to collect income tax, or any direct fax, from us but very few Canadians understand the history of banking policy in Canada and to what degree our system is based on attempts at banking reform in the United States. When you fully understand this question I am certain that you will be angry. I certainly am.

Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy

"During the Civil War (from 1861 - 1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War from the North. The Bankers were going to charge him 24% to 36% interest. Lincoln was horrified and went away greatly distressed, for he was a man of principle and would not think of plunging his beloved country into a debt that the country would find impossible to pay back.

Eventually President Lincoln was advised to get Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes to pay for the War effort. Lincoln recognized the great benefits of this issue.

At one point he wrote:"...(we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts..."
Click to expand...

The Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back, so the people called them "Greenbacks".

Lincoln printed 400 million dollars worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created, a debt-free and interest-free money to finance the War. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. He printed it, paid it to the soldiers, to the U.S. Civil Service employees, and bought supplies for war….."
Click to expand...

Shortly after that happened, "The London Times" printed the following:"If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe"......
Click to expand...

After this was published in "The London Times", the British Government, which was controlled by the London and other European Bankers, moved to support the Confederate South, hoping to defeat Lincoln and the Union, and destroy this government which they said had to be destroyed…...

"In 1972, the United States Treasury Department was asked to compute the amount of interest that would have been paid if that 400 million dollars would have been borrowed at interest instead of being issued by Abraham Lincoln. They did some computations, and a few weeks later, the United States Treasury Department said the United States Government saved 4 billion dollars in interest because Lincoln had created his own money. So you can about imagine how much the Government has paid and how much we owe solely on the basis of interest."
Click to expand...

The "Michael" Journal, November-December 1992, page 14, 1101 Principale St., Rougemont, Que. Canada-J0L-1M0

"Unpayable debts

“This means that just to maintain the same amount of money in circulation in our country, year after year, unpayable debts must pile up. For example, if one wants to maintain only $100 in circulation, year after year, by borrowing at 6% interest, the debt will be $106 after one year, then $112.36 after two years ($106 plus the 6% interest), and so on. After 70 years, the debt will have reached the sum of $5,907.59, and there will still be only $100 in circulation.”

In the case of public debts, the bankers are satisfied as long as the interest on the debt is paid. Is it a favour they do to us? No, it only delays the financial impasse for a few years since, after a while, even the interest on the debt becomes unpayable. Thus, in the example of the $100 borrowed at 6%, the interest due on the debt will have reached $104.26 after 50 years, which is more than all the money in circulation.”

No wonder then that the national debts of all the civilized countries in the world are reaching astronomical proportions. For example, Canada's national debt, which was $24 billion in 1975, is now over $500 billion, and the interest on this debt costs over $40 billion per year, or about one third of all the taxes collected by the Federal Government; this percentage keeps increasing year after year. So, to satisfy the bankers, the Government must slash all its other expenditures.

Will the Government wait until servicing the debt takes 100% of the taxes, to change the system, or will it prefer to let people starve? Moreover, the national debt is only the peak of the iceberg: there are also the debts of the provinces, municipalities, corporations and individuals!”
Click to expand...

(Michael Journal).

Here are some of my own comments from our Sherbrooke Village ezboard community that will help you to tie all these facts and figures together.
http:// p079.ezboard.
com/bsherbrookevillage
(This ezboard community has since been hacked and does not contain all the original posts)

Before this campaign is over I believe that most Sherbrookers will know that they have a very serious decision on their hands."

-According to the Canadian Constitution, the Federal Government does not have the right to tax income; this right belongs only to the provinces. The Supreme Court confirmed it in 1950.-For over fifty years, Gerry Hart, a citizen of Winnipeg, used this decision of the Supreme Court, and did not pay any Income Tax;

-The Canadian Constitution of 1867 gives the Federal Government the right to issue its own currency, based upon the resources and wealth of the nation;

-In 1913, the Federal Government injustly gave up this power to create money to private banks, which forced the Government to get into debt to private banks, and this debt has not ceased to grow ever since. (In 1994, the debt of the Federal and Provincial Governments is over $700 billion.)"(“Michael” Journal).
Click to expand...

In the beginning of this thread you read some interesting facts about the monetary policy adopted by President Abraham Lincoln, just before the Civil War. What years are we talking about here?

The Civil War lasted from 1861 - 1865.In what year did the Fathers of Confederation draft the British North America Act?

As I am sure you know, Canadian Confederation took place in 1867.

GUESS WHY THE MEN WHO DRAFTED THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION WOULD FORBID THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM LEVYING A DIRECT TAX ON THE PEOPLE OF CANADA?

Do you think it could possibly be because they were well aware that President Lincoln had come up with a fantastic monetary system and wanted to emulate it in Canada?????

I do.

Do you think that these men realized that the Lincoln policy had saved the American taxpayers billions of dollars in interest payments and they wanted to save the Canadian taxpayers money as well?

I do.

NOW DOES IT MAKE MORE SENSE THAT THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION FORBIDS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM LEVYING A DIRECT TAX ON THE CITIZENS OF CANADA?

It should.

At first it seems out of this world and impossible that our Federal Politicians are not allowed to put a tax on our income according to the Canadian Constitution, but not if you study the Lincoln monetary system, and realize that the men who drafted our constitution wanted Canadians to have the same advantages.

Before this campaign is over you will know why I have ran for public office and you will know that Sherbrookers are facing an extremely important question on October 16, 2004.

Do the people of Sherbrooke have the courage to potentially ruffle a few feathers in Ottawa in their attempt to shove the faces of our federal politicians in the smelly mess that they have made on our floor?

Do the people of Sherbrooke really want to try to show our Prime Minister and our Federal politicians that the men who drafted the British North America Act were highly intelligent people who had a tremendous advantage over our politicians here in 2004?

Back then, they had a good example to look at, study, and emulate. Here in our time period, ignorance of basic economic principles is essential for advancement in the federal political party system. Sherbrookers, if you want all things to continue as they did last year and the year before that.

If you are too worried to fight for a better monetary policy and banking system, then you certainly don't want to vote for Dennis Tate. You had better cast your ballot for anybody else but. I plan to make some noise over the coming weeks, months and years. If you want to amplify my voice, then maybe you should vote for me for Municipal Councillor on October 16."

Rage, Rage, against the dying of the light."

The holocaust was highly efficient and over the past twenty years employees in government and industry have been demoted, retrained, multi-tasked, laid off, downsized, and streamlined. Any government employee can tell you that they are now doing jobs that would have been done by two or perhaps three employees three decades ago. Are Canadians heading into another holocaust of sorts??

Think about it.

Is the next logical step a computer chip placed under our skin that will permanently identify us and let anybody in the correct office know exactly where we are at all the time? If you considered this possibility ridiculous twenty years ago, surely you realize that almost anything might happen now?

The kind of polite silence that came from our provincial MLA's when federal politicians and bureaucrats decided to close down and tear up our railways will lead to more downsizing, more cutbacks and a higher level of efficiency that is expected of all of us. I think that we may as well make our stand now before it is too late.

http://p079.ezboard.
com/fsherbrookevillagefrm11.showMessage?topicID=4.topic
(ezboard has been deleted)....
THE SHERBROOKE REFERRENDUM

Now we come to the BIG Question. What do we do with this information?

How do we cause reform in the ridiculous and foolish monetary system that our federal politicians have adopted?

Personally, I believe that we must forward this information to every RCMP officer in Canada and we must set a date for reform in our banking system or we should arrest every uncooperative federal politician in Canada on the charge of “Criminal Negligence Causing Death.” How about January 1, 2006 as the final cut off date for the levying of any direct taxation by our federal “government”?

How about turning every penny of direct taxation collected over to our provincial politicians after this date?

Shouldn’t politicians be held accountable for taking the reigns of government in a manner similar to how a school bus driver bears a certain responsibility when he or she sits behind a steering wheel?

I believe that they should certainly be held accountable and I do believe that the judges in each case should perhaps consider having some mercy on each of these defendants because certainly most of our politicians have almost no understanding of the economic theory of underconsumptionism, the monetary plan behind the British North America Act/Canada’s Original Constitution or the effects of our flawed monetary policy on Canadians, not to mention on the lives of kids in the third world.

I believe that the massive government spending cutbacks in health care and in our Canadian Armed Forces, over the past several decades, has certainly resulted in many premature deaths in Canada? It could even be argued that General Romeo Dallaire might well have been instrumental in warding off the genocide in Rawanda but, every major decision in Canada has been profoundly affected by our flawed monetary system. We have defined ourselves as essentially bankrupt in order to please a small but powerful segment of our population.

I believe that government spending cutbacks in our RCMP and in our Coast Guard is partly to blame for the fact that perhaps two thirds of the drugs that reach American cities come into North America through secluded and difficult to police areas of the Nova Scotia coastline.

If our federal politicians are not partly to blame in all this, then who is?

Oh, incidentally, I believe that our somewhat less than courageous provincial politicians had better help us to rip the power of direct taxation away from our federal government and give this power squarely back to our provincial governments as originally designed in the British North America Act or we should have them up on similar charges as well.

Then again, you could always leave this to be dealt with by a certain somebody else!

“But the cowardly, unbelieving,…and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” (Revelation 21:8)
(Personally I’m hoping like hell that ultimately this is a metaphor for guilt because I know that I would be feeling major guilt right now if I hadn’t tried my best to warn you all about this. On the other hand those negative near death experiences are kind of scary!)

Do you know why Canadians enjoy a relatively high standard of living in comparison to the rest of the world?

Our parents and grandparents prayed, fought tooth and nail for and many died young for each one of the incredible blessings that most of us take for granted!

Are you willing to step up to the plate and try your best to do something about all this?

Here is what Mr. Jimothy Mason, an American who is planning a run for the Presidency in 2008 said after reading my theories:

Ø Jimothy, what do you think, can you fit this information into yourcampaign for President of the United States??

Sir Dennis,Not only can I "fit it in" but I feel that God is telling me that I
would be wise to make this a central piece of my platform!
It's going to take me
awhile to absorb everything because, yes, thunder has struck!And I feel that you
are an invaluable resource to this group and to
me
Blessings,
Jimothy
“Jimothy Mason, 2008 Republican Candidate for the U.S.
Presidency”
Click to expand...

Yahoo! Groups
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jun 5, 2018

Part 2 of my 2004 campaign:

WHAT IS UNDERCONSUMPTIONISM? DO YOU THINK OUR PRIME MINISTER COULD DEFINE THIS THEORY IF ASKED ABOUT IT TOMORROW MORNING?

Basically, underconsumptionism, is the idea that in a technologically advanced economy, the sum total of the wages paid out to all workers involved in the creation of consumer goods, will never be as high as the value of the goods that they can produce. Globalization and the lessening of trade barriers between nations can cause the discrepancy between the supply of funds in the hands of consumers, and the total global level of production, to become almost incomprehensible.

This quotation from a Lubavichter Jewish website sums up the question quite well:

"1. The first thing Moshiach does is do away with bad marketing."
"That's the
true villain that has held us back all these years. Ask anyconsumer electronics
or computer engineer. We could all own household robots todo our work. We could
be consuming less than 10% of the natural resources weconsume now if it weren't
for those nefarious busy bodies who market quantity rather than quality. Given
the true needs of most people and the productivity possible with modern
technology, we should all be working an average of 2.5hours a week. What's
responsible for the other 60+ hours?
BadMarketing."
"Moshiach's marketing people
will get people's minds back on the righttrack. Thinking about real quality of
life. About their relationship with theearth and with their bodies and their
souls and the people around them. Once that's done, just about everything else we
need to create paradise is here already."
Click to expand...

Sighting Moshiach

I cannot possibly stress enough how dangerous these ideas are potentially.

We are the grandchildren of the people who killed every passenger pigeon.

The unwise application of this theory can lead to drastically increased economic activity and such high levels of consumption that we end up causing irreparable damage to the environment. Widespread understanding of this theory could potentially lead to the most massive military buildup in history as well.

I believe that our politicians and intellectual elite decided to not clearly explain these concepts, even to our university students, because they knew that we humans tend to take such information and channel it first into warfare. They perhaps consider that we, the ignorant masses, neither deserve nor could handle the tremendous power inherent in such knowledge.

On the other hand, I personally cannot imagine any possible way to prepare for a time of warfare and natural disasters, unless our political leaders comprehend the implications of this theory. Joseph led Egypt to store massive amounts of grain for potential times of trouble but our leaders tell our farmers to burn excess grain to attempt to keep the prices high. Don’t believe any politician who tells you that it is impossible to get prepared for rough times ahead.

"And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do." (Genesis 11:6).

So how should our Canadian federal government finance federal spending?

Ninety eight percent of all money in circulation is never printed. It is nothing more than a number on a ledger. I believe that our federal government must again use the bank of Canada to put perhaps half of the money supply of Canada into circulation through loans to the provinces and municipalities of zero or perhaps one percent interest. This is what we did from 1940 to 1970 but then we changed our system and adopted the American model. I assume because of pressure from the United States.

It has been estimated that we could have saved sixty five billion dollars in interest payments, in the one year of 1995, if we had went back to our wartime monetary and banking system. Instead of having a deficit of roughly thirty billion dollars for that year, we could have had a surplus of thirty five billion dollars.

Each year, the debt owed as interest on all loans in the economy, is a vastly higher sum than the interest paid to depositors by all banks in Canada.

Unless this higher number is put into circulation by our Bank of Canada, by order of our federal politicians, then we end up with a total figure for government, business and personal debt, that is vastly higher than the total amount of currency in circulation. The men who drafted our Canadian Constitution had planned for our federal politicians to be forced to address this problem by forbidding that they engage in any form of direct taxation.

If you held the power to legally print the Canadian dollar, would you be so stupid as to get yourself a trillion dollars into debt?

This is not rocket science, this is just a matter of realizing that the men who drafted the British North America Act, were onto something that most of our political leaders are too busy kissing babies and shaking hands to find out the simple truth about.

So Sherbrooke, do you want this information thundered or whispered?

The choice is yours.

I sincerely thank you for giving me so much of your time.

Warmest Regards,

Dennis Tate

p.s. On September 29, I e-mailed this article to virtually every reporter at the Halifax Herald. Sooner or later I’m going to run into some Canadians willing to put forth the effort to make this information public knowledge. (Thank God, I’ve already met some concerned Americans). After October 16, I plan to explain how this information can be applied on the small scale, the microeconomic level. If you have the internet, I’ve already told you about a few possible methods on your Sherbrooke Village ezboard. A businessman once said that he often needed to come up with two hundred ideas on how to solve a problem before he found the one that really worked! What do you think of idea number one?
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jul 24, 2018

drluggit said: ↑

You sound like a Malthusian. I suppose that it never occurred to you that "damping" economic output also irrevocably damages people and their livelihoods? But hey, the "environment" is better? Laughable.
Click to expand...

Actually..... I am pro-life and I would even say that terribly flawed central banking policies play a significant role in well over thirty percent of abortions.

"A Ban on Intra-cardiac Potassium Chloride Injections on Singletons" will be one significant part of my next campaign..........
the following quotation will give you a good idea why I will risk being kicked out of Canada's Conservative Party to elaborate on my promise to table that bill if I am elected........ but I will need to hold the office of M. P. for over a year before I could table a private members bill of this nature.

An old story, remnants of late-term abortion discovered

kazenatsu said: ↑

Warning: the following story may be a little disturbing or gut-wrenching. You may not want to read it.

It was a Friday evening, and Chad Traywick and his wife, Darda, had just returned to their Houston, Texas, home only to find themselves surrounded by swarms of police – including the SWAT team and a van from the coroner's office.

After police pulled the shocked couple from their truck and patted them down, Detective John Hill informed Traywick that the police wanted to search his house.

As the detective explained, a local photo-finishing store had called police to report that Traywick had apparently beheaded and mutilated a newborn baby and had taken pictures of the infant. The SWAT team had come out in force, prepared to arrest satanic cult members – baby killers who had carried out a ritualistic mutilation connected with some Satan-worship ceremony, and who had the further audacity to photograph their victims.

But when officers entered the house, instead of finding occult paraphernalia associated with child sacrifices, they discovered pro-life and religious posters and books.

Traywick explained to police what had really happened. Newly active in the pro-life movement, Traywick had gone to a local abortion clinic – the Women’s Pavilion – at 3 o’clock Saturday afternoon to scope out the best location for conducting a picket of the facility. Finding the building oddly deserted and the door open, he took a quick tour. After wandering through stylish, relaxing waiting areas and immaculate operating rooms, he entered a small back room filled with 15 plastic buckets with lids on. Realizing what they must contain, he snatched one of the buckets and made a fast retreat.

Enlisting the aid of his wife and a friend to videotape and photograph his opening of the container, Traywick slowly lifted out the contents from the bucket. What he found shocked him to the core. Rather than a tiny fetus as he had expected, what he pulled out appeared to be a full-grown baby, whose head and right arm had been ripped from his body and his brain removed. In his agony, the baby had bitten through his own tongue, no doubt while his head, grasped by forceps, was being literally ripped off his body. The little boy had an incision where other organs had apparently been removed – evidence that someone had sought more profit from the baby’s death than the $1,800 the abortion had cost.

Traywick drove the film to the nearest one-hour photo developer. "I explained to them that the pictures were of an aborted baby and asked if they would have any problem or felt uncomfortable developing them," recalls Traywick.

Over the blare of the Christmas rush, the clerk hastily took the negatives and assured Traywick there would be no problem. When he returned for the developed photos, however, the clerk was obviously uncomfortable and nervous. The 35 mm photographs were so horrific that they strained the credibility of Traywick’s story, and the store's staffer had called the police to investigate a grisly crime for which he held the evidence. Indeed, when the police saw the photos, they too were convinced a horrific crime had been committed.

After convincing police he was not a baby-killer on that 15th day of December, 1989, Traywick agreed to make a statement at police headquarters the following morning. On January 20, 1990, Chad Traywick buried the aborted baby, whom he named David, after a memorial service attended by over 100 people.

WARNING: the following photo may be extremely disturbing
It shows Baby David, the 28-week-old "fetus" that was aborted. The 16-inch long pre-born underwent a D&E abortion, where the head was ripped off the body.
Click here to see Baby David.

original article by David Kupelian, http://www.wnd.com/2003/01/16826/

This also brings to mind another story, one from Russia.
An update on the mystery behind those bins of fetuses that were found dumped in the forest in Russia's Sverdlovsk region:

Police say that they have tracked down the car that was responsible for dumping these fetuses. They say that the car belonged to the Sverdlovsk Region Administration, a part of the administration which is the Municipal Recycling Enterprise, and they're responsible for disposing of waste and recycling as well. Police have found documents linking this disposal company to the Urals Medical Academy, and that the fetuses were supposed to be incinerated, because they are classified as Class B biomedical waste, as all human tissue is, and as such they should be incinerated, but in this case, because they were wet and soaked in formaldehyde, the company decided it would just be too difficult in this case, so they decided to dump it in the woods.

This still leaves more questions though. These fetuses were all between 22 to 26 weeks, which is a late-term fetus, and in Russia it's illegal to have an abortion at that stage, only with the exception of a medical emergency. So it doesn't answer the question why all of these fetuses – 248 of them – were past this point. So is this a possible illegal abortion operation? Who knows. There's still some more investigation to go on that front.

https://www.rt.com/news/fetus-dump-police-investigation-452/

I think what these two stories demonstrate is that late-term abortions may still be going on behind closed doors.

If a facility would kill at 15 or 20 weeks, it's not that big of a jump to kill at 22 or 28 weeks.
I mean mentally. Think about it, someone kills fetuses all the time, everyday, that's what they do for a living. It's like a soldier killing in a war, they become desensitized it. And it demonstrates how easily this can become a slippery slope.
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Sep 17, 2018

drluggit said: ↑

You sound like a Malthusian. I suppose that it never occurred to you that "damping" economic output also irrevocably damages people and their livelihoods? But hey, the "environment" is better? Laughable.
Click to expand...

The plot thickens........

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/letter-to-premier-wynne-from-kevin-oleary.498361/#post-1069624477
Letter to Premier Wynne From Kevin OLeary

DennisTate said: ↑

For the record.... I vehemently disagree with Mr. Kevin O'Leary on this........

I do think that this is the right time for Canada's Conservative Movement to go through
a reformation.........
and I have a plan in mind that can make my area Central - Nova relevant to
both.....cleaning up Canada's Conservative movement by dividing it.......
with..... altering the flavour of Canadian politics for all time.

I am going to attempt to the best of my ability to apply the principles elaborated on in the
documentary "The Secret"......
to Canadian politics here in Nova Scotia.

Kevin O’Leary: Now is not the time — why I can't support Maxime Bernier's new party
Canadians will be asked to participate in not just an election next year but an exorcism. Trudeau and his management team must be replaced

Step #1.... I attempt to the best of my ability to lure this impressive young man in to be my opponent so that Mr. Tim Moen, rather than Dennis Tate, ends up representing the Peoples Party of Canada here in Central - Nova:

Hey..... he could kind of remind voters here of Mr. Peter MacKay!!!!

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...er-mackay-back-into-canadian-politics.524586/

I want to lure Mr. Peter MacKay back into Canadian politics....
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Oct 7, 2018

I know that the other political leaders will not touch this subject......but I am sure that Mad Max Bernier will begin to research this as soon as he sees this. I am pretty sure that he will not tell me that I have nothing to worry about. A Carbon Tax would be completely ineffective in protecting the eastern region of the Bay of Fundy from a significant rise in ocean levels in the event that rapid cracking and sliding of ice were to occur on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.

The threat of rising ocean levels could unite humanity around the project of large scale desalination of ocean water to turn deserts green as predicted in Isaiah chapter 35. Because the eastern region of the Bay of Fundy here in Canada experiences the world's highest tides........ we Canadians are somewhat forced to think about this problem in a different way than somebody else who is far inland away from the ocean.

....... "I have began to wonder if I am missing some
important factor that would cause my line of
reasoning to be in error regarding a theory I
have put out there on just how much of an increase
in high tides might occur along parts of the Bay of Fundy
where we already experience the world's highest tides.

I live in Guysborough County, Nova Scotia. The
difference between low tide to high tide on a normal
day is one to one and a half meters.... along fifty kms of
coastline here.

There are places along the Bay of Fundy where the difference
from low tide to high tide.... .can be fifty feet or more.

This occurs notably near Truro, N. S. and Moncton, New Brunswick.

The landform of the Bay of Fundy has a funnelling effect on
the tidal waters as they come in............ and so the multiplier
effect on the tides there is FIFTEEN TIMES.... or even more in
some areas.

What if...... a massive cracking and sliding of ice were to occur
on the land based Greenland Ice Pack and/or the West Antarctic
Ice Sheet..... and lets speculate that average world oceans rose by
merely one foot, (30 cms).

IF... .that 15X multiplier effect carried through...... then.......
perhaps in a few places along the Bay of Fundy.... high tides might
be up by 30 cms x 15 = 450 cms or 4.5 meters.

In my part of Nova Scotia the high tide mark might not be up by much more
than the thirty centimeteres...... due to the fact that the land form where I live
DOES NOT have a 15 X multiplier effect on tidal waters.

Am I being alarmist and really missing some important factor that
makes my theory terribly in error?" (June 28, 2016)

...... "Although I am no expert and did not even finish university I have concluded that
the 10 X to 15 X multiplier for high tides in the eastern area of the Bay of Fundy ............. could well continue to follow through if average ocean levels were to
rise a significant amount. There are two primary reasons:

1. The land form of the Bay of Fundy funnels high tide waters from a very wide
area of the Atlantic Ocean into a more and more narrow area.

2. The fact that the distance from Yarmouth to Truro, Nova Scotia is about 174 miles......
means that the waters of the previous high tide......... cannot sufficiently drain before the next high tide
begins to come in........... WHICH MEANS THAT THE NEW HIGH TIDE WATERS..... tend to pile on top of.....
the receding high tide waters! (It takes over four hours to drive from Truro to Yarmouth Nova Scotia..... and obvioulsy
the receding high tide waters cannot travel as fast as our cars so each new high tide for the Bay of Fundy..... adds to the previous high tide waters that were not able to fully drain from the Fundy)!

So....... a one foot worldwide average increase in ocean levels could well produce high tide levels that could be up by ten to fifteen feet along parts of the eastern area of the Bay of Fundy. " (August 10, 2018, post #114 here):

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/geology-physics-high-tides-question.463012/page-6
Geology, physics, high tides question.

Actually..... it will not go up to the full 15X though due to the large rather flat farmland areas in Kings, Hants, Colchester and Cumberland Counties in Nova Scotia and in Westmoreland, Albert and St. John's counties in New Brunswick.

As you can guess.... I feel pressure to make as many people as possible aware of this problem....... as well as what sure looks to me like possible solutions to this problem. Humanity now has the technology to reduce ocean levels down to where they were in 1918..... which would be to lower average ocean level by eight to sixteen centimeters.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...nt-the-ppc-in-central-nova-n-s-canada.542991/
Dennis Tate wants to represent the PPC in Central - Nova, N.S., Canada?

DennisTate · Oct 7, 2018

©by Dennis Patrick Tate 2018

I have serious doubts that this problem can be handled by the public sector....... I think the solution can only come from the private sector..... but I do feel a responsibility to toss my hat into the political ring largely to make more people aware of the complexity of this.

Personally...... I believe that this situation should be put in front of Canada's Dragons....... and the USA Shark Tank...... by some concerned volunteers who will pass this idea on to the Dragons and Sharks free of charge to them. I would love to help out in any way that I can. (OK... maybe for one dollar per year just to make things legal)!

The best idea that I can come up with so far is for Canada's Dragons.... and several of the USA Sharks........to go to President Donald J. Trump...... with an offer to borrow the 4.3 TRILLION USA petro - dollars that are in the hands of George Soros, China, Russia and other companies and individuals who tend to agree with the George Soros plan to devalue the USA petro - dollar. I would suggest offering to pay two percent interest on that loan......... which is pretty good considering that IF.....CANADA'S DRAGONS ARE ABLE TO PREVENT A ten percent devaluation of the USA dollar..... they would in a sense be paying the USA not two percent interest.... but the equivalent of twelve percent interest. If Canada's Dragons were able to prevent a twenty percent devaluation of the USA dollar......... they would really be paying USA taxpayers the equivalent of twenty two percent interest. President Trump has the power to freeze assets of somebody who is out to destroy the USA..... .for example George Soros.... and I assume he has the power to transfer those funds to genuine allies of the USA.... .such as Canada's Dragons and the USA Shark Tank?!

A more in depth explanation is given on this page:

P. M. Netanyahu, President Trump has a 4.3 trillion dollar problem....

I put important parts of this basic idea in front of Canada's Liberal Party, specifically in front of M. P. Bill Casey here:

M. P. Bill Casey... President Trump has a 4.3 trillion dollar problem....

DennisTate said: ↑

Honorable Minister Casey:

If you happen to take another look at this thread.... here is some more information relevant to why I feel President Donald J. Trump has a multi - trillion dollar problem heading in his direction.........

Europe Unveils “Special Purpose Vehicle” To Bypass SWIFT, Jeopardizing Dollar’s Reserve Status

and......

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...g-it-russia-is-actually-abandoning-the-dollar

Russia Is Doing It – Russia Is Actually Abandoning The Dollar

and......

https://www.aljazeera.com/programme...tro-yuan-dollar-hegemony-180331091248813.html

China's 'petro-yuan': The end of the dollar hegemony?
Shanghai is reportedly taking the first steps to pay for imported oil in reminbi, or yuan, instead of the US dollar.

Click to expand...

DennisTate · Oct 8, 2018

Great to see the colossal error by P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau in 1974 getting some more attention.

Bank of Canada Lawsuit One of the most important legal cases in Canadian history has been crushed by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2017 for political reasons. Launched in 2011 by the Toronto-based Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER), the lawsuit would require the publicly-owned Bank of Canada to return to its pre-1974 mandate and practice of lending interest-free money to federal, provincial, and municipal governments for infrastructure and healthcare spending. Renowned constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati has taken on the case for COMER, and he considers it his most important case to date.

On October 14, a Federal Court judge cleared away yet another legal roadblock thrown in the lawsuit’s path. The federal government has tried to quash the case as frivolous and “hypothetical,” but the courts keep allowing it to proceed. As Galati maintains, “The case is on solid legal and constitutional grounds.”

When asked after the October procedural hearing why Canadians should care about the case, Galati quickly responded: “Because they’re paying $30 or $40 billion a year in useless interest. Since ’74, more than a trillion to fraudsters, that’s why they should care.” (COMER says the figures are closer to $60 billion per year, and $2 trillion since 1974.)

The Fraudsters Created during the Great Depression, the Bank of Canada funded a wide range of public infrastructure projects from 1938 to 1974, without our governments incurring private debt. Projects like the Trans-Canada highway system, the St. Lawrence Seaway, universities, and hospitals were all funded by interest-free loans from the Bank of Canada.

But in 1974, the Liberal government of Pierre Trudeau was quietly seduced into joining the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – the powerful private Swiss bank which oversees (private) central banks across the planet. The BIS insisted on a crucial change in Canada.

According to The Tyee (April 17, 2015), in 1974 the BIS’s new Basel Committee – supposedly in order to establish global financial “stability” – encouraged governments “to borrow from private lenders and end the practice of borrowing interest-free from their own central banks. The rationale was thin from the start. Central bank borrowing was and is no more inflationary than borrowing through the private banks. The only difference was that private banks were given the legal right to fleece Canadians.”

And that’s exactly what “the fraudsters” did. After 1974, the Bank of Canada stopped lending to federal and provincial governments and forced them to borrow from private and foreign lenders at compound interest rates – resulting in huge deficits and debts ever since. Just paying off the accumulated compound interest – called “servicing the debt” – is a significant part of every provincial and federal budget. In Ontario, for example, debt-servicing charges amounted to some $11.4 billion for 2015.

What is key to the COMER lawsuit is that the Bank of Canada is still a public central bank (the only one left among G7 countries). Their lawsuit seeks to “restore the use of the Bank of Canada to its original purpose, by exercising its public statutory duty and responsibility. That purpose includes making interest free loans to the municipal, provincial, and federal governments for ‘human capital’ expenditures (education, health, other social services) and/or infrastructure expenditures.”

From the Biblical viewpoint, usury is a heinous sin. The main Hebrew words used for "usury" are nashak or neshek, meaning "to strike with a sting like a snake, bite, lend with usury, exact interest on a debt." Exodus 22:25 says, "If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury."

Leviticus 25:35-38 is more specific. It states that we are to relieve our poor brethren, taking no usury or increase from them. Verse 37: "Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase."

The church saw Usury as a mortal sin and prosecuted it as such for 1500 years, with usurers being refused absolution, their will and testimony being nullified and their descendants deprived of all inheritance, usurers would have no Christian burial and all their possessions would be seized and distributed among the poor.

Supreme Court of Canada Dismisses Constitutional Bank of Canada Case, Claiming It Is a Political Matter

http://www.comer.org/content/SupremeCourtDecision_4May17.htm

Canadian Federal Debt Clock(not including provincial debt!)
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=....org/debtclock/canada&event=video_description
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Oct 9, 2018

I do realize that it is close to political suicide to write something positive about an opponent.............
but I suspect that he isn't merely my opponent.........

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-dollar-problem.531929/page-2#post-1069723960

DennisTate · Oct 10, 2018

drluggit said: ↑

You sound like a Malthusian. I suppose that it never occurred to you that "damping" economic output also irrevocably damages people and their livelihoods? But hey, the "environment" is better? Laughable.
Click to expand...

I actually support boosting the economy by improving central banking policy.

Here is a good write up on what happened here in Canada.

https://bettysearlyedition.blogspot.com/2015/07/how-pierre-trudeau-turned-us-into-debt.html

HOW PIERRE TRUDEAU TURNED US INTO DEBT SLAVES

HOW PIERRE TRUDEAU TURNED US INTO DEBT SLAVES
Click on the link above to watch Part 3 of my video series on the Canadian Banking System. Please also read accompanying text below.
Trudeaumania was just gearing up when I immigrated to Canada in late 1966. I, too, was impressed with Trudeau. He was intelligent, articulate, with liberal ideas. And as Prime Minister, Trudeau repatriated the Canadian Constitution and told the morals’ police to stay out of people’s bedrooms. But then…but then. As Anthony’s famous speech in Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar reminds us… “the evil that men do live after them while the good is often interred with their bones. So let it be with Caesar.”

But somehow this worked backward for Trudeau. Many Canadians still think highly of Pierre Trudeau, but in 1974 he did one terrible thing that changed the lives, for present and future, of all Canadians, for the worse. Trudeau gave the leading operations of the Bank of Canada over to the private banks operating in Canada.

The Bank of Canada was first established by Prime Minister Richard Bennet in 1935 as a private central bank, but was then nationalized by William Lyon Mackenzie King in 1938. By nationalizing the bank, Mackenzie King meant for it to belong to the people so the Canadian government could borrow funds with little or no interest for capital expenditures. The mandate of the newly nationalized Bank of Canada was to act as the banker to the government and to manage the public debt. As Mackenzie King famously said: “Once a nation parts with the control of their currency and credit, it matters not who makes that nation’s laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.”

So the Bank of Canada was nationalized in 1938 and the government could now borrow money with little or no interest. And it worked. The Canadian government built freeways, public transportation systems, subway line, airports, the St. Lawrence Seaway and funded a national health care system and the Canada Pension Plan. But then Trudeau, under the influence of the international financial group called Basel’s
Committee’s Recommendations (The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision) made the decision to halt the borrowing of money from the Bank of Canada, and instead, chose to borrow from the private banks who instead of lending to the government at no interest, or low interest, introduced higher interest rates along with compound interest.

All banks know very well the magic of compound interest. And Pierre Trudeau must have known that the mounting compounded national debt would lead to Canadians eventually owing a dollar fifty for every dollar of their disposable incomes. After all, he studied economics at the London School of Economics. Surely the professors there knew about compound interest.

So Pierre Trudeau, instead of feeling blessed that Canada, unlike the US, had a nationalized central bank, signed our bank away to the private banks. Couldn’t Trudeau, such an educated man, surmise that citizens in a few years would be struggling to make car payments and meet rent and mortgages and student loans and to buy healthy food while last year’s profits for the big five (that’s Royal Bank, TD Bank, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal and CIBC amounted to $31.7 billion?) If he did, he didn’t care. But it doesn’t have to be this way. It really doesn’t. Our Bank of
Canada is still there. Next time.

Click to expand...

DennisTate · Nov 18, 2018

I am really glad that I saw this:

But I think that former Canadian Minister of Defence and Minister of Transportation gave a somewhat simpler and more easily applied version of a similar idea:

Here is the winner though for the all time simplest and most concise explanation for this idea:

"We never should have privatized our debt and turned it over to the
private banks, we should have kept it in the hands of the Bank of Canada,
at least a major part of it, because then we would have been paying
interest back to ourselves." (NDP Leader Jack Layton)

Click to expand...

DennisTate · Dec 17, 2018

"How to make the world better. Really. With Dr. Bjorn Lomborg."

"On December 7, 2018, I spoke with Dr. Bjorn Lomborg, author and President of Copenhagen Consensus Center, a singularly innovative and influential US-based think tank. Dr. Lomborg and his team have done the hard conceptual and empirical work necessary to turn good intentions for global improvement into implementable and economically efficient strategies. That's really saying something.

They have, among other things, analyzed the UN Millenial goals (169 of them, which is far too many), prioritizing and rank-ordering them in terms of practical implementability and costs and benefits. Those who claim to truly care about the world's dispossessed could do far worse than to study Dr. Lomborg's work." (Jordan B. Peterson)

I actually have been in contact with Dr. Lomborg since I quoted him in my 2008 campaign writing.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...paign-writings-as-art.534297/#post-1069162942

(Post #3):

"Bjorn Lomborg argues that many of the elaborate and expensive actions now being considered to stop global warming will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, are often based on emotional rather than strictly scientific assumptions, and may very well have little impact on the world's temperature for hundreds of years." (lomborg.com/coolit/)
Click to expand...

DennisTate said: ↑

Here is my 2008 primary campaign writing:
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Dec 21, 2018

Maxime Bernier's latest challenge: an ultramarathon
Beauce MP raises $153,000 for charity after 13-hour run

People's Party of Canada's National Leader Mr. Maxime Bernier has set the bar
very, very high for anybody who would want to challenge him for the leadership of
our new political party.

©by Dennis Patrick Tate 2018

I have been thinking this through though over the past couple of
months and I do want to attempt a challenge to Mr. Bernier's Leadership. My opening gambit is a proposal for a
a film production company plus cooperative plus kibbutz with some variation of the name,
"Republic of Western Canada Film Productions Ltd" and / or "Republic of Western Canada Film Productions Coop Ltd." etc. I want to donate my write ups plus whatever I can
give to you for footage from here in Nova Scotia to explain the astonishingly interesting position that
I feel you are in. I would suggest seriously considering making the USA dollar your official currency due to the
seemingly very serious threat that seems to be looming against the USA petro - dollar from China, Iran, Europe and to a degree even Russia.

I consider the threat against the USA petro- dollar to be so serious that I attempted to get M. P. Bill Casey to research it.

M. P. Bill Casey... President Trump has a 4.3 trillion dollar problem....

DennisTate said: ↑

Honorable Minister Casey:

If you happen to take another look at this thread.... here is some more information relevant to why I feel President Donald J. Trump has a multi - trillion dollar problem heading in his direction.........

Europe Unveils “Special Purpose Vehicle” To Bypass SWIFT, Jeopardizing Dollar’s Reserve Status

and......

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...g-it-russia-is-actually-abandoning-the-dollar

Russia Is Doing It – Russia Is Actually Abandoning The Dollar

and......

https://www.aljazeera.com/programme...tro-yuan-dollar-hegemony-180331091248813.html

China's 'petro-yuan': The end of the dollar hegemony?
Shanghai is reportedly taking the first steps to pay for imported oil in reminbi, or yuan, instead of the US dollar.

Click to expand...

My daughter, step-son and nephew were in the Disney film, "The Circuit" starring Michelle Trachtenberg back in 2007 and I found out that minimum wage for any Disney actor with so much as one speaking line is about a thousand dollars per hour.

I believe that the PPC, the Conservative Party and perhaps another political party or two or three should get together to come up with a way to oppose Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's policies that are driving Albertans toward wanting to leave the Confederation of Canada.

Fellow aspiring People's Party of Canada candidates...... let's volunteer our time and ideas through video and discussion forums and donate the proceeds to perhaps a Food Bank as Mr. Bernier did or perhaps to one of the three or more film production organizations formed to promote this option because frankly........... making people aware of all that has happened is the best way to keep Canada together!

Within days of the calling of the 2019 Canadian federal election I would love to see all card carrying members of the PPC and Canada's Conservative Party, (and perhaps another invited relatively Conservative or Libertarian party or two), and we vote on which one of us goes up against Liberal M. P's all across Canada.

I personally would like to seriously discuss exempting many Conservative M. P.'s from facing a PPC candidate in their riding because obviously defeating P. M. Trudeau's Liberals must be a priority.

Why leaving Canada makes sense for Alberta, and U.S. would likely welcome a new state
'Right now, every man, woman and child in Alberta pay $6,000 more into the national budget than they get back. Alberta is the only province that is a net contributor'

I would like to nominate Conservative M. P. Michelle Rempel to be exempted from facing a challenge from the PPC in her riding.

Inside the vote: how Tory MP Michelle Rempel passed her motion on the Yazidis

I also hereby nominate The Alberta Independence Party candidates to this proposed PPC plus Conservative vote off before the next federal election.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/AlbertaIndependenceParty

Alberta Independence Party

DennisTate · Dec 21, 2018

Wow!!!!!!

I have to admit that the discussion of Secession by Alberta may well be the only way to actually reform Canada!

Okay. My position has changed. I run a media company, Chase Global Media Inc.

I was to provide the political strategy for the PPC. 2 weeks ago, I resigned. This was due to no possible win available, after Max announced he would freeze equalization payments to 8 provinces and form a committee for review.

This lead me to be hired by the Alberta Independence Party., as political advisor and media production services. My position now is to complete the firewall, Stephen Harper proposed when he was part of the Reform Party. Secession will be on the Alberta ballot for May 2019. It is the only method to reform Canada.

As well as the only method to protect Alberta and our jobs and economy. Please visit my timeline. There is a video by Candice Malcom, explaining equalization payments and the fact 7 of 8 provinces collecting equalization payments, all have oil and gas to drill, but refuse to do so.

You can find me at AlbertaIndependenceParty.net I'm listed there.

We can't afford to see who gets in to federal power. Alberta has no more time. Besides the fact 93% of Alberta conservative voters (85% - 90% of all voters) want to secede.

Broken down, on over 15,000 surveyed, 41% want it now. 52% want it if no deal with Ottawa. Unfortunately, there is only one way to assure we are protected from Ottawa. And that is at least, secession, followed by reforming Canada. I hope this explains my position and affiliation?" (Robert David Lang)
Click to expand...

https://albertaindependenceparty.ne...v_zp0_Wqx5jvWPbPtdTLa4SEvuReD9OZPiZOGACglubCs

DennisTate · Dec 21, 2018

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=314329385844129

https://albertaindependenceparty.net/dave-bjorkman/

About Dave Bjorkman

Dave was born in Peace River, Alberta. He worked as a farm hand, bottle depot sorter, swamped, hi-way construction, service, drilling and seismic hand.

He graduated in Business Management from Nait in Edmonton while working nights at an ice cream factory. He started an entry level clerk position in transportation to a corporate position in open and cased hole logging for western Canada and broke into the USA market after a Texas hurricane. He ran a successful small business in satellite communications.

With a bottleneck in exploration, Dave took the welding program and ran two welding trucks as an independent contractor.

Dave belongs to union, non-union and merit contractor associations. He has a long history of fighting for the people: rallies for labour, GST, Carbon Tax, Bill 6, Bill 24, Crown land and public Access, Gun Rights and Alberta Resource Rights.
Click to expand...

To what degree are supposedly Green organizations being used to....

....get at the thirty five TRILLION dollars worth of oil and natural gas reserves in the Arctic?

Or to set the stage for the devaluation of the USA petro - dollar which is in some danger due to the 4.3 trillion USA petro - dollars in the hands of China, George Soros, Iran, Europe and Russia?

DennisTate · Dec 25, 2018

Now here is an intriguing suggestion:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...nia-for-alberta.547506/page-2#post-1070026450

Would Americans be willing to trade California for Alberta?

FreshAir said: ↑

we can give them Texas, keep California
Click to expand...

DennisTate said: ↑

I would sure love to see an actual discussion begin on this because this would sure set up some people to more seriously consider this option:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...u-think-of-my-alternative-wall-theory.483090/

Do you basically like my Alternative Wall Plus Theory

I suppose it has advantages over a carbon tax.
4 vote(s)
26.7%

That is the dumbest idea I have ever heard.
7 vote(s)
46.7%

No.... Mexico must pay for it...Canada has no part in it.
0 vote(s)
0.0%

*
I supposed it could help us to cooperate more with Israel.
4 vote(s)
26.7%

Which brings us to this option:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/my-2006-2008-2016-and-2004-campaign-writings-as-art.534297/&fbclid=IwAR0mWFkVbViuLVatk1wDnJjMAKEVkGXTrH7BgVAEhln_PmWG0J1-13Ixauk#post-1070012100
Click to expand...

Here is my summary of the challenge facing us that in my opinion makes it necessary to think well outside of the box in order to come up with good potential solutions to the ways in which this could potentially get nasty?!

4.3 trillion USA petrodollars in the hands of China, Iran, George Soros, Europe and to a degree plutocrats in Russia who could potentially be persuaded to make an all out attack on the value of the USA dollar.

Thirty five trillion.... the valuation placed on oil and natural gas reserves in the warming Arctic that interest both Russia as well as China.

One hundred and seventeen trillion..... The number of DERIVATIVES created by less than brilliant.... and less than entirely altruistic people who have a great deal of control over Wall Street.
Click to expand...

The Hurricane of USA one dollar dream given to Christian Psychic Shane Warren back around 2011 is the main way that this could get pretty serious.

That is give after the 17 minute mark in this video:

DennisTate · Dec 27, 2018

This is an exceptionally insightful comment regarding petrodollars and those three numbers 4.3 trillion, (the amount of cash in accounts in the hands of enemies of the USA who are publicly discussing the devaluation of the USA dollar, (China, Iran, Soros and his buddies, Europe and to a degree Russia)), the 35 trillion, (the valuation on oil and natural gas reserves in the melting Arctic), and the 117 trillion, (the value of Derivatives on the Wall Street markets that in the opinion of many make the petrodollar vulnerable to an attack).

Joe Hankins Petrodollars are a fictitious number assigned to oil reserves of any given country, they are measured in American dollars which, over the years has been artificially propped up in order to maintain global power. China and Russia for years have been buying up gold reserves to return to at least a proportional gold standard in order to replace and eliminate the US currency globally. Gaddafi worked towards bringing Africa back to the gold standard and some say this is why he was eliminated.

All this said, Petrodollars are simply a measure of oil wealth and a simple way to trade globally. The US has become an exporter of oil again and now takes back a great deal of those Petrodollars as I belive I've read they are the #1 exporter. If the system bucks the US Petrodollar it will just be measured in some other currency. The USs ability to be self reliant on energy is greatly tied to Albertas oil sands and all the more reason to get top dollar for our oil.

The questions that come to mind are who in the world wants the US diminished? Who benefits from the US losing its biggest trading partner? Who wants the US relying on foreign oil?
Click to expand...

I am of the belief that a reality plus semi-reality science fiction film series set supposedly in 2012 - 2015 in an alternate universe / example of applied Multiverse Theory (applied by G-d actually).... in which Mr. Mitt Romney is elected POTUS in 2012 and takes office in January of 2013...... has huge potential because his church, the Latter day Saints essentially control the State of Utah which sets us up for the possibility of:

Could a Utah State Dollar save the USA Dollar?

DennisTate · Jan 3, 2019

And now to ramp all of this all up......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazel_McCallion

Hazel McCallion
Click to expand...

, CM (née Journeaux; born February 14, 1921) is a Canadian politician and businesswoman who served as the 5th mayor of Mississauga, Ontario, from 1978 until 2014.[1] She is the first and current Chancellor of Sheridan College.[2]
Click to expand...

drluggit said: ↑

You sound like a Malthusian. I suppose that it never occurred to you that "damping" economic output also irrevocably damages people and their livelihoods? But hey, the "environment" is better? Laughable.
Click to expand...

Your comment is indeed impressive.....
So I would love to get your feedback regarding three numbers........
4.3 trillion USA petrodollars.....
35 trillion USA petrodollars... and
117 - 127 USA petrodollars?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...field-theory-of-m-w-p.548225/#post-1070057848

"4.3 trillion USA petrodollars in the hands of China, Iran, George Soros, Europe and to a degree plutocrats in Russia who could potentially be persuaded to make an all out attack on the value of the USA dollar.

Thirty five trillion.... the valuation placed on oil and natural gas reserves in the warming Arctic that interest both Russia as well as China.

One hundred and seventeen trillion..... The number of DERIVATIVES created by less than brilliant.... and less than entirely altruistic people who have a great deal of control over Wall Street."
Click to expand...

And now to contact the Honorable Ms. Hazel McCallion to see if she will give me a public reply on all this????

DennisTate · Mar 2, 2019

Mr. Keith Helmuth has absolutely nailed this topic!!!!

DennisTate · May 18, 2019

I have got to finish listening to this later on.....

DennisTate · May 21, 2019

Wow!!!!!

I sent off a message a few days ago to a group capable of correcting any errors in my 2006 campaign writing and indeed they did get back to me with a brilliant reply:

https://www.facebook.com/COMerPMP/
"Committee On Monetary and Economic Reform"

"If I have made any significant errors in this message please correct me." (Dennis Tate, Monday, 11:50 pm).

"Hi Dennis, thanks for your message. We aren't here at the moment, but we'll get back to you soon!"

https://www.facebook.com/groups/565213087274651/permalink/673739823088643/

From 1940 to 1974 the Government of Canada put roughly half of the total money supply into the economy through loans issued through the federally owned Bank of Canada. Provincial and municipal governments could borrow the money to build roads, schools, hospitals and sewage treatment facilities at zero or one percent interest. In 1974 we changed our system and since that time a higher and higher percentage of all government debt is financed through loans issued through privately owned banks. At this time it is ninety eight percent. This policy may be great for our banking sector but it was estimated that in the one year of 1995 alone our federal government could have saved roughly SIXTY FIVE BILLION DOLLARS in interest payments if we had gone back to creating half the total money supply through these low interest rate loans issued through the bank that is OWNED BY ALL CANADIANS.

Considering that our deficit was approximately thirty billion dollars for that year, simply by changing back to an already proven monetary and banking system, we could theoretically have had a FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS OF THIRTY FIVE BILLION DOLLARS in 1995.

The massive cutbacks in the Canadian military, in health care, highway construction, social programs and education were profoundly affected by these accounting practices?
Click to expand...

Hi Dennis,

Thanks for allowing us to clarify this history, as there has been ALOT of misinformation floating around about it, and it seems you've picked it up.

First of all, it would be hard to calculate the government's contribution to the total money supply in those years as we did not track the same monetary aggregates back then, but rest assured, it was nowhere near half, it was much lower. In Canada private banks have ALWAYS been the biggest creators of our money supply. We did however do higher levels of monetary financing (central bank money creation) but never much more than 25%. Here's a great paper on the topic:

http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_848.pdf

And it's important to distinguish between "loans" and "monetary financing". The BoC makes very few loans, because its loans are not for building things or funding things, they are for temporary shortfalls in a government's budget. Here's a list of EVERY loan the BoC ever made:

http://understandingcanada.ca/2017/10/bank-of-canada-advances-to-federal-and-provincial-governments/

Central banks don't carry loans for a particular purpose (ie infrastructure), that's not how central banks work. They loan when a government is short of funds, and the loans are very limited in time and amount, as per the loan provisions in the BoC Act. The BoC also is not allowed to loan to cities, because they are not recognized in the BoC Act as a viable institution to lend to. They only lend to other financial institutions and federal and provincial governments.

Now, monetary financing is like a permanent loan, it's how the central bank can create non-physical money for the government. And that used to be higher, but was lowered after 1980. What happened in 1974 was the switch to monetarism, for five years (coinciding with three years of wage and price controls) the central bank switched to monetarism, trying to control inflation through controlling the money supply through interest rates. It was a dismal failure, and then (for reasons we've yet to uncover) over 1980-1982 the central bank severely curtailed the amount of monetary financing it was doing, likely in a desperate last ditch attempt to "lick inflation".

It must also be understood, the loans that did happen to build things, like the loans to cities to build infrastructure:

http://understandingcanada.ca/2017/10/municipal-improvements-assistance-act-1938-bill-143/

Those loans came directly from the feds, not the BoC. The BoC helped fund the feds through monetary financing (monetary policy) and the feds decide how to use the money they collect from both taxes and that the BoC creates for them (fiscal policy). Taxes and BoC money creation all goes into the same pot, there is no distinction, so one cannot say which funded what. It should also be noted that at that time, peaking in the 60s, Canada had a top tax rate over 90%, so we were taxing alot more than we do now. Lastly, there is ZERO proof of what interest rate various loans were made at, other than the Municipal Improvements Assistance Act (2%), but it was not zero or 1%. What that history is confusing is the cost of monetary financing, which is NEAR-interest free because the interest on the debt comes back to us minus the costs of the BoC.

What skyrocketed our debt mid-70s was a combination of high inflation that started with OPEC oil crisis then shot up further into a wage-price spiral due to union wage contracts being tied to inflation, and higher interest rates to quell that inflation, and lastly the reduction in monetary financing that saw more of our debt supplied by private banks. Yes, monetary financing could have avoided much of that, but you must understand INFLATION was the main driver of our increasing debt, not so much any moves made by the central bank (until 1980, but by then the debt was already rising fast).

Your math predicting a surplus in 1995 is a bit suspect, I don't think you're distinguishing between debt and deficit. When the central bank does monetary financing our debt still goes up, it's just the debt is owned by the public instead of private investors, and so we repay ourselves. Debt is the amount of outstanding bonds and t-bills we have, the central bank holds some, private investors hold the rest. What's important is not how much debt, but WHO OWNS the debt.

Deficit on the other hand is the difference between spending and taxation, a deficit means we spent more than we taxed and must borrow the difference. But to get a surplus means you TAX more than you spend, you take in more money than you put out. Which is why, ironically, people should dislike a surplus because it means the government taxed more than it spent on the public. So in the end, there was no way to squeeze a surplus out of 1995 without cutting even more services (spending less) or taking in more revenues (higher taxes or fees).

We hope this has been educational, it's a complex topic with a very blurry history. Please don't hesitate to reach out with anymore questions.
Click to expand...

Log in or Sign up

My 2006, 2008, 2016 and 2004 campaign writings as ART.

Is the world economy being deliberately dampened, perhaps to save the environment?

Yes

No

Maybe?????

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

drluggit Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

My 2006, 2008, 2016 and 2004 campaign writings as ART.

Is the world economy being deliberately dampened, perhaps to save the environment?

Yes

No

Maybe?????

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

drluggit Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Useful Searches