N.Y. Times scraps AIPAC from Syria story

N.Y. Times scraps AIPAC from Syria story

How is it that this one particular lobby can have so much influence yet be so poorly known by the US public? And you thought the fourth estate was the press? The press seems, at least in this case, to be subservient to an organization that better fits the definition:

 

It is perhaps AIPAC that shut down (terrorized) the NYTimes newspaper (for that article).



http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/27/tech/web/new-york-times-website-attack

The @nytimes attack was going to deliver an anti-war message but our server couldn't last for 3 minutes," the group posted on its Twitter feed at about 9:40 Wednesday morning.


.

 

We still havent attacked Syria. Evidently the power of AIPAC isnt as you imagined.

 

Gee I wonder why they would cut an anonymous source claiming a Jewish conspiracy to attack Syria, could it be because it's bull(*)(*)(*)(*)? Was it an administration official; such as, the radical leftist, 9-11 truthtard, and, Green Energy Czar, Van Jones?

 

Washington lobbyists should be required to present their lobby in writing, naming all recipients, and the documents placed in the public record. Only then will the US of AIPAC start to free itself from the domination of a foreign power.

 

There is only ONE long term and effective answer.

If you can identify a group/org/ethnic minority that have habitually abused their positions in the body politic for their own ends, then you simply ban that group from the fields of politics, media, law, etc.

That's it.

Done and dusted. After that you would have no problem with this.

 

That's basically the modern definition of anarchy. You realize that right? Society would probably devolve into tribal groups that would turn Darwinian.

 

Unbelievable right? AIPAC lobbying our immaculate government for the well being of Israel over the well-being of the U.S.A. Unprecedented...

 

Amen to that and well said.

It's refreshing to see the Israeli press agreeing that AIPAC dominates Washington- albeit with its mandatory nationalist caveat. Thanks for producing that. I believe that this dominance can only be broken by drawing the attention of the US public to it more frequently than AIPAC draws the attention of Washington to Israel. The Israel Lobby must be forced into the open. When describing those aspects of Washington which are in the pockets of AIPAC the term ' US of AIPAC ' is most appropriate. That's exactly what's being described , a US of A which is being manipulated by a foreign power. Here we go again into a war for ' Israel's security ' which is immensely damaging for America and from which Israel- and the neoZionist regime which controls it- will emerge unscathed and stronger. Americans should reject this familiar cycle. The blood and treasure expended is their blood and treasure and its being squandered by ' representatives ' who are- in reality- representing somebody else. The US of AIPAC is an ogre. It threatens world peace like no other threat and it operates behind our lines with the approval of our representatives in the US and all its allied countries. The recent Brit rejection of war with Syria was a procedural error in their parliament which the Israel lobby is, even now, trying frantically to ..er......correct. Call a mongrel a mongrel- and call the US of AIPAC the arm of a foreign power when that's what it is.

 

.

MegaDittos on that post Moon

rs

.

 

Who is the US of AIPAC anyhow? You keep referring to this and I'm wondering if it's a group of Muslims or some drunken old British ladies bowling club.

 

Well it's isn't anything about a 'Jewish conspiracy' , just rather that AIPAC likes to keep as low a profile as possible.

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/2...ian-intervention-while-new-york-self-censors/

 

See it described in post #8 and my follow-up to that excellent observation.

I do - and for the reasons stated in my follow-up post. Now that it's been made abundantly clear to you- yet again- I'll expect a cessation of your trolling comments with regard to the term.

 

This is a little bit too obvious so i am not biting .

 

The US has been MADE this sick by the virus/host that is on it.

This women can see it;


[video=youtube;XunOXRiOv0E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XunOXRiOv0E[/video]

 

You think there is some conspiracy at work ?

Most people used to consider the USA a moral candidate. What happened ?

 

Israel made the top 10 in lobbies at #10: http://www.businesspundit.com/10-of-the-biggest-lobbies-in-washington/

AARP is bigger.

 

Absolute subversion happened.

Which the subversives shall deny until the very end.

 

And joint top spot for mendacity.

No wonder Jimmy Savile was fettered by them.

No wonder the rapist Epstein is so fettered in the US.

Fitting.

The same.

 

I'm wondering if Israelis would be better off if their government gave up its Statist expansionism and instead contracted its borders becoming more like what Vatican City is for all Catholics?

 

Right....the next morning the arab world (and probably the rest of the world) would start demanding that Israel shrink even further. Do you really think the Arabs will ever accept Israel in any borders? Do you remember what good came out of Israel's unilateral withdrawal from Lebanon and Gaza? Exactly, absolutely nothing. Israel's enemies shifted the goalposts right away and used the "liberated" land to fire rockets. Let alone the obvious strategic fact that not just a couple of towns but the entire state of Israel would be within the reach of Hamas Kassam rockets and Hezbollah Katyushas.

 

Pure classic anti-Semitic "Jews control the world governments," canard pulled straight out of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery.

 

What's the downside?

 

Yes we know classic anti-Semitic "Jews control the government" canards pulled straight from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery, I've heard it all before, tell me why would the removal of the secular, stable, albeit totalitarian and anti-Israel Assad regime on their border be in the interests of Israel especially since those of you against intervention in Syria keep hammering day in and day out that the Syrian opposition is composed of Al-Qaeda Islamists?

Sorry sport, but the removal of Assad is in line with the U.S. policy of democratization of the region formulated in the Clinton years by PNAC and others, and implemented after 9-11, the U.S. believes that our long term security and economic interests in the region can only be achieved through the democratic peace theory being put into action. But hey if you prefer "JOOZ are everywhere" conspiracy theories, by all means.

 

PNAC.

Lol. So over represented with... um... Scientologists.

[video=youtube;1uT7kcAu4i8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uT7kcAu4i8&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

The Project for the New American Century was an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. established in 1997 as a non-profit educational organization founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.

http://www.nndb.com/people/379/000048235/

Kristol was born on December 23, 1952 in New York City, into a Jewish family. His father, the late Irving Kristol, served as the managing editor of Commentary magazine and has been described as the "godfather of neoconservatism.

Not forgetting...

Paul Wolfowitz

The second child of Jacob Wolfowitz (1910–1981) and Lillian Dundes, Paul Wolfowitz was born in Brooklyn, New York, into a Polish Jewish immigrant family.

Nup.

Nothing odd looking there.