New Travon Martin Pic ~ # 2

Trayvon's mother worked full time.. what is the problem in Trayvon doing some house work?

My son called me at work and asked me to host dinner party for his GF's father.. I didn't even have to ask. He dusted and vacuumed before I got home.

You are really reaching to d*mn this family.

 

This is old news and I can't believe Crump is even commenting. He has proven to be wrong on everything.

 

No .. she didn't kick him out .. She sent him to Sanford for his suspension. Why should he hang out at the house?

Parents have to be firm... but you assume that all black parents are irresponsible.

IMO children should do some chores.. even if the parents have domestic help.. It means that they have VALUE in the maintaining the functioning of the family..

 

(*)Originally Posted by(*)Margot(*)
Not every home these days has a landline.
------------------------

Yes they do.Whether or not a resident has an active account is another question.
Though even without an active account 911 service is often still available per FCC requirements that there be a soft/warm dial tone.
Whether or not a resident actually had a telephone is again a different question.

Again though it's irrelevant as TM had no intentions of calling anyone for help in any case.
Did you even read my post?

Geeez, this is why I rarely bother addressing you, you either aren't paying attention or your just intentionally obtuse.

 

Hi Doombug,

Sure... it goes to the page you mentioned. At the top of the page a video will appear (after a couple seconds), it will run a couple of 30 second ad's (*sigh*), but then the discussion begins. It really is interesting, if you can see it.

Regards

Here is the link again, (and thanks once again to Ex, for posting it)............

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/45755884/#51995393

 

LOLOLOL.. Who counts on a landline that is wired in but not an active account?

 

Read the rest of my post.
I've already addressed that.
I'll not repeat myself continuously because you've no comprehension of what I'm posting.

 

You do realize at by the time the trial begins, all that desperate move to release "damaging" information about Martin will also be old news. . .

This is what convinces me that The defense is at eend of its rope. . . .and that that premature release of information unrelated to the night of the killing is a desperate attempt to sway the jury pool.

And itwill probably backfire on the defense. . . .most decent people do not appreciate a purposeful attempts to throw dirt on e victim, look at Jodi Arias

 

OMara was a divorce lawyer.. I think he is out of his depth.

 

Typical of you, anything to remain in ignorant delusion.

Carry on.

 

How do you call from a landline that is inactive?

 

I did not find it at all interesting, nor did it present anything new. In fact, I found it quite biased.

Of course Omara is getting info out into the Court of Public Opinion. But for anyone to claim "foul" is to ignore how Z was smeared in the Press for the last 16 months. Right here in PF we still hear the most ignorant characterizations of Z based on flawed, if not dishonest, recounts of Z's past.

As a side note, Sharpton just plain talks way too loud. He almost acts as if he is preaching, in that he needs to speak to someone hard-of-hearing sitting in a back row.

 

Already explained it to you twice.
For further explanation I suggest contacting the FCC.

 

Hi Margot,

Unless the "line" has been physically removed from the home/apt, even though you may not have an active service account with a provider, 911 calls can still be placed.

Same holds true for (at least some) cell service providers. Example, I had an old inactive mobile phone, previously on Verizon. Switched to another carrier/new phone, but a year later could still access 911, on the old one.

 

Providing you have a landline instrument.

 

I'm suprised to hear that myself, it's fairly common knowledge.
Taught to children in school at a young age where I grew up.
It's good info to have, could save a life.
Tell your young ones if you have any.

- - - Updated - - -

I addressed that too.

 

I understand, 82. Perfectly acceptable.


For me, it was interesting. I appreciate any and all perspectives, regardless of my opinion of something at the time.

Allowing ones self to be open to different perspectives/opinions, is important in shaping a final personal opinion (for me personally).


Regards

 

Thats a good phone to have in the glove box, or in my case the toolbox on the tractor as I don't take my cell when I'm on it for fear of losing it, just remember to keep it charged.

Hopefully I'll never need it!

 

lol... well yes, that's true.


**For anyone that doesn't have one, PM me... I've got at least half dozen of the old things stashed away. hahahahaaha

- - - Updated - - -

Excellent suggestion, JW.

 

You are wishing it will work out that way. There is no comparison to the Jodi Arias trial. This case is more along the lines of the Duke Lacrosse case...

 

Trayvon apoligists are funny. Trayvon said it himself: His mom kicked him out....

 

You reach just as far, if not further, to d*mn O'Mara, Zimmerman, and his family.

 

Why would TM need a landline at home? He had his cell phone.

 

Time out. You are asking me to justify murder. I can't do that because murder involves malice. I can speak of a right to self-defense, which can be a lawful homicide.

There is no evidence that GZ did anything more than walk away from his vehicle. As much as that upsets the GZ-haters, he was will within his legal rights to do so.

The grounds for GZ killing TM was GZ's fear of losing his life or suffering great bodily harm. That is the legal standard. A stranger sucker-punching someone and then subjecting them to a sustained beating on the ground in the dark could certainly put a lone reasonable person in such a state of fear. The person being assaulted does not have to wait until they suffer great bodily harm or a fatal wound. Why is this so hard to grasp?

That sounds like emotional drivel. This was not a fist fight. GZ was on the ground being beaten. TM had NO facial trauma. So, the question is why do you need to manufacture a fist fight in order to justify what TM did to GZ? You should be ashamed of yourself.

The pictures demolish the image of TM being an angel. Why is it ok for the lynch mob to talk about GZ's past, but it is wrong to show what TM was all about i.e. drugs, guns, violence, and possessing women's jewelry and a burglary tool?