When does this kind of "strategic" slamming of a Candidate before a vote or primary become tampering with an election? Seems a story like this only serves one purpose, as it is not relevant news anyway, and the timing of it only adds to this.
Having a hard time with simple reading comprehension this morning? No where did I state that the media or Obama control newt's life. But siting on a story, in the case that Newt gets the nomination, is overt bias on the part of the media. How's this so hard for you to grasp?
Can you take your ignorant racist crap somewhere else and stop polluting this place please. Thank you.
Newt has a zero likeability factor with independents ie stupid people who don't pay attention. That's all that matters in a general election. The sooner he gets out the better.
I would say considering the dramatic decline of the United States over the past 10 years and the last 3 under Obama that we are not in a position to be choosy. Meaning that the first two attributes far outweigh the third.
So what, Clinton got Bjs in the WH and cheated on HRC and not one lib cares so why should Cons care what Newt did?
and isn't the same for Obama. Only he was never vetted. And we STILL don't know important NEED TO KNOW information.
The have fine tuned their phoney procedures down to a T. We are holding off on the story (phoney ethical imagery to the sheep) They will milk it for the juice prior to unleashing it, they will unleash it and milk it...and then they will feign ethics with doe like eyes and a hand across their heart when they are finished. Second (only to corruption in Washington and politics as a whole) the freaking media should have a public gutting exercised on it.
They are both, the media and government, controlled by the same interests on both sides. The corporate oligarchy wants a Romney-Obama election. It's win-win.
They are both, the media and government, controlled by the same interests on both sides. The corporate oligarchy wants a Romney-Obama election. It's win-win.
That means your opinions are not very important since it will be either Obama or the Republican candidate who wins the election.
NG never stood a chance anyway, he's crazy as a loon and everyone knows it. He's a waste of campaign finance money, among other things.
I'm sure that Newt will have an explaination for whatever startling information his ex-wife has to share.
One woman, Anne Manning, has come forward and confirmed a relationship with him during the 1976 campaign. "We had oral sex. He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, 'I never slept with her.'" Newt pressed his first wife to sign divorce papers while she was still in the hospital recovering from cancer surgery. He also graciously said "She isn't young enough or pretty enough to be the President's wife." But his second marriage hasn't been that smooth either. Newt and Marianne have been separated - "frankly", she told the Washington Post in June 1989, "it's been on and off for some time." The hospital visit wasn't the end of it, either. Shortly after the cancer ward visit, Newt stopped paying alimony and child support. Jackie had to take Newt to court to get him to contribute for bills, as utilities were about to be cut off. http://www.realchange.org/gingrich.htm#checks
Lie. Hearsay. Such is life. Yes during divorce proceedings that can happen and quite frankly we will never know the private details enough to even concern ourselves with it. But why does it matter? Bill Clinton.
Don’t ever allow the Ex-Wife to Live after you’ve Publicly F’ed her … ! But to be honest with you … if you’re a Newt supporter, ethics and adultery doesn’t bother you anyway. So … I’d tell her to bring it on … He’s can publicly Rape her and he’ll still get a Standing Ovation from his supporters.
Anyone can be labeled once the issue questions are asked and answered. There are far too many one sided issues to remain in the middle. Most people are too stupid to pay attention to all the issues in an election which is why they call themselves "independent". Its code for "independently not smart enough to research the issues before I vote on the guy with the best hair or smile"