Obama : Called Bengahzi incident an act of terror.

All I can say is read my sig line - any mention of a terrorist attack there? No, just a reference to that crappy piece of anti-Islamic agitprop that Obama & Co. are using to obscure what really happened in Benghazi.

The fact is, Obama is a pathological liar, so the disinformation the administration was spewing after the attacks hardly comes as a surprise. But what's far worse than the lying to the American public is the gross negligence that contributed to the deaths of four Americans.

 

ya walid you are forcing me to add your name to my ignore list along with the rest of the drunken kids here

 

Is that a promise ali baba?

Well ali baba, here's another one for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2s2VsUGBcJI&feature=related

 

n/t

double post

 

Yep. It was no reference to any specific terrorist attack by those crazy muslim barbarians at all, not even close.

The Treasonous Muslim Marxist Lying Turd in chief knew he was lying and knows he's been lying all along. Like those crazy muslims, he thinks his lies are justified in order to advance his wicked agenda.

 

If the Obama admin wanted us to believe that, they wouldn't have spent the next two weeks telling us that it was a spontaneous riot as a result of an online video.

In the rose garden, he also mentioned 9/11/01 before using the words acts of terror. So telling us that he spoke those words is simply playing childish word games.

Benghazi was a major screw-up. Instead of biting the bullet and owing up to it, the Obama admin tried to cover it up. In so doing, the whole matter becomes non-redeemable. So instead of leadership, we get self serving contempt and yet another entanglement to have to work out.

 

don't you think that after 12 years of lying presidents and very likely another psychopath being elected by you in 12 days, somehow you need to try to work out a way to either figure out when you are being lied to because take Iran for example, you all are still believing with NOT a SHRED of EVIDENCE the lines being fed to you daily by the liars? or try to find some system where you get to choose from a better class of candidates and from a selection of more than 2!

Seriously we are all around the world suffering because you guys keep electing lunatics and supporting the biggest psychopath Netanyahu who does nothing but create chaos after chaos!

edit: make that 16 years I forgot about Monica!

edit again:

make that the last 50 years just to be sure

 

and you wonder why half the world doesn't believe the 9/11 official story!

 

Don't you think it's kind of perverted and twisted to be following a religion, islam, that promotes old men like mohammed having sex with 9 year old little girls?

 

What are you talking about?

 

so you are ok with worshipping a pedophile, a lying one at that.

 

I really find it incredable that people can be so brainwashed like that.
Of course, I also find it incredible that people can strap a bomb onto themselves to kill other innocent civilians.

Who is shooting school kid girls in the head?
Who commits mercy killings?
Who got their asses handed to them in the wars where Israel gained large portions of arab land and then when the arabs finally cried uncle, they gave it back?
\Who is calling for the anihilation of Israel?
Who doesnt even put Israel on their maps in schoolbooks.?
Who invaded kuwait?

 

At least we have two to choose from, your idiotic countries usually dont have that.

 

I guess creation and the other lib clones said their piece and then ran,

 

It seems to me that Obama spun the thing suggesting the entire mess was caused by a large part of the Islamic world going nutty POed by the infamous silly movie. He may have 'hedged his bet' in mentioning terror giving himself a bit of wiggle room. Still the misdirect constitutes a serious offence IMO, especially if he was purposely covering up his and his administrations neglect (in many areas) offering a silly story in lieu of facts. Much smaller things have took down presidents. We can only hope eh?

reva

 

Of course it means something.

It is a big issue.

The white house is lying in an attempt to cover up the negative consequences of a very dangerous foreign policy and the tragic results of their destabilization of foreign lands.

They lie to get people on board with an agenda and trick the people into thinking it's not so dangerous, so they can continue creating more danger and destabilization.

Politicians lying SHOULD be a major issue for people. We shouldn't tolerate it. The constant coverups and attempts at obfuscation by the white house, which is EVERY administration to ever grace it, needs to STOP, people need to STOP tolerating, and start imposing some accountability, or the continuing reckless foreign policy will continue to drag not just the relevant countries but the United States as well, down.

Stop saying the lies are no big deal, and start saying we will no longer tolerate the lies. Especially when it's lies to cover up such a MASSIVE foreign policy failure that the entire republicrat party have been pursuing for decades.

 

The Russians say we should try to resolve the issue peacefully?

Peacefully?!?!?! That's preposterous!!! They actually want peace?!?!!??!

VETO!

And get this.. That's not all.. The Russians weren't only just calling for a peacefull resolution in which we would preserve these pesky human lives, but get this, they actually wanted the rights of Libyan citizens, ALL of them, to be protected!?!?!?!

They want both peace and a respect to human rights?!?!? These people need to learn that peace is not an option for this area of the world. Peace is dangerous, and very costly to the business of the offense contractors, oil companies etc.

And we will continue to abuse our veto power as much as it takes until the entire rest of the world finally learns that finding diplomatic solutions and protecting human life is not a sound policy and it is not an option.

 

What do you mean either party?!?! Since when have we got two parties?!?!

 

Dude!!!! Lol. I mean I don’t know where you are hailing from DL but Abu Sina's Egypt is a chaotic cesspool of their own making! If Egypt had of chosen a system like the USA i.e. a democratic representative republic with its electoral college system maybe their nation would not be on fire. Maybe if they would have been more like the USA they would be experiencing freedom of the press*, instead of the Muslim brotherhood threatening to seize the Egyptian media to propagandize and corrupt the truth. Instead of a free people it seems that Egypt is sliding post haste into a quasi theocracy with extremist Islamic terrorists working feverishly to install Sharia law rule just as I (and others) predicted. God bless the citizens of Egypt. In an effort to continue feeding the people the same propaganda that got them into this excuse for a revolution**.

** The revolution was just that when it began a peoples popular revolution. The uprising began as the people wanted, however as the operation progressed it became obvious that IMO the revolution was actually a planned operation to install an anti west radical Islamic government, and enslave its people using Sharia law and other elements of Despotism, It is not a revolution by the people for the people.

* Sources available on request.


reva

 

I don't know why I even bother with your tripe, Egyptian. Have you looked at your own farcical excuse for a "government" lately? How many church-burning psychopathic Salafists did you clowns elect to parliament?

For your information, there are 6 people running for president - not 2. Their names are Barack Obama (Democrat), Mitt Romney (Republican), Gary Johnson (Libertarian), Jill Stein (Green), Virgil Goode (Constitution) and Rocky Anderson (Justice). Now, you're up to speed

As for Iran, the IAEA has spoken on this matter, and we've already been over their reports on Iran's activities that are exclusive to the development of nuclear weapons. Maybe you should read something other than Press TV sometime.

 

So, half the world is dumber than dirt and gullible enough to believe whatever suits their credulity. What's so mysterious, much less new, about that?

BTW, in case you missed it, be sure to read Post #170 on the previous page.

 

Another drive-by fail...

 

Something about this had my spidey senses up.
I just thought of something.
Ok, lets say Obama called it a terrorist attack.
Why wasnt the press asking which group was responsable?
Then, in the following days when Rice, Hillary, and Obama himself were saying it was the video, why wasnt anybody asking "hold it, you said it was a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden, now you are saying its a video?"
NOBODY said that, because NOBODY believed his speech said it was a terrorist attack. NOBODY.

Obama desperately needed Libya to seem like its situation had been normalized so Obama could take credit for doing a great job there. In order to do that, he had to pull security personel out, even at the risk of American lives.

When the attack occured, he couldn't allow two things. 1. To let it be known that the Americans were murdered because he had stood down troops from Libya. 2. It was a terrorist attack because after all, we had AL quiada on the run.

Now, when the info came in that the attack was occuring, he calculated, probably with Hillary - the wicked witch of the east, west, north and south, that if they could obscure things by calling it a result of riots like the ones in Cairo, it will be difficult to anyone to really be able to tell, since there was so much confusion, and the "fog of war".
...... But to be safe, you know he carefully calculated every single word in his speech, it allowed him to be able to make the claim either way, depending on what has been discovered, and when.
........ they were simply hoping it would be covered up enough until after the election.
Now congressional hearing are set for a week after the election.
...... If they had called for those hearings three or four weeks ago, they would be going on before the election and Obama would be dead and done, stick a fork in it.

But that doesnt explain why they were calling it a video, if he had said it was a terrorist attack
earlier. Now they are just claiming, oh, it isnt fully investigated yet, things still arent clear, too much confusion still.

Its alright, he and hilllary will be getting the big stick up the rear eventually, and obama's great legacy of universal health care for all americans will be dismantled by ROmney, which I think is easily the biggest reason he wants to get re elected, to keep it intact.
And the Libya American Murders will eventually overshadow everything for him and hillary

 

I would think theft and breaking and entering is a bigger concern than how a president phrases something.

 

When you need production, you look for those that can produce. Romney has proven this, it's what he does. What was Obama's strengths? Obama might be good at organizing a strike, but if he had to ''run'' the same company it would fail. Two men, two different strengths

Will Romney be the perfect answer? Naa, but it's a step in the right direction.