Obama Social Security Number To Become Issue In 2012 Race

Whatever you say Apuzzo.

 

Foggy was Apuzzo, not me.

Pretty stupid for Wash to hallucinate I would post both as an Obot and a Birther.

 

LOL... indeed

 

Really???
Do you not surf the web or know how? There are closing in on a million inquiries to this topic with major headings. Do you classify that as nobody. Would your grade school math teacher classify that as nobody?

 

i doubt it wong...

 

How did you get the President's social security number?

 

baskin robbins in hawaii had it...

 

You shouldn't be breaking into Baskin Robbins.

Hope you got some ice cream too.

 

ever go into a baskin robbins high ? you should... sheriff joe's bombshell will be about obama's fake ss number. the number was in a fortune cookie... not a good fortune, or a good cookie...

 

Hey, Birthers getting Obama's social security number out of a fortune cookie makes as much sense as anything else you claim. Go for it.

I predict Sheriff Joe's bombshell will be non-existant.

 

more evidence it's dying away... i predict obama will resign...

http://www.project.nsearch.com/prof...ued-over-obama-eligibility?xg_source=activity

 

I can't wait for birthers to lose this case too, so they can immediatly claim victory!

 

LOL... even Orly says this case is a loser.

 

LOLOL.. I predict that some birthers will learn to read.

 

Thanks, considering that every Birther prediction- every single one- has failed- this is reassuring.

 

Then why can you go on line and there will be list after list and site after site that shows what state has what first 3 digits to Social Security number. And why when a person applies for a job the Social Security check list shows what state the card was issued? You are making up things that just are not true. And when you do this you lose all credibilty.

 

The SS# that Obama used for Baskin Robbins is NOT known. However Obama's SS# 042-68-4424 was obtained from the Selective Service Registration completed supposedly by Obama So if "Ineptocrats" claim Obama filed a Selective Service Registration then you have to accept that his SS# is 042-68-4424 plain and simple.

 

Ineptocrats if you wish this valid issue of Constituional eligiblity would go away why do you continue to debate from the wrong side of the issue?

 

Because SSNs were at one time assigned based on the zip code from which the application was mailed. But it has never been based on where you were born or where you lived.

The "Social Security checklist?" Now you are just making stuff up. There is no such thing.

Then don't take my word on it. Go see what the SSA say themselves:

So... you want to keep talking about who here has credibility and who does not?

 

This has never been a valid issue of eligiblity. It hasn't even been about eligibility.

There is only one candidate you have asked for proof eligiblity for- and he has provided it. None of the other candidates have been asked for, nor provided any evidence that they are eligible. Rick Perry has even pointed out that he hasn't shown anyone his birth certificate.

This has never been about eligibility. This has always been about Obama.

It will go away when the Birthers stop spreading rumors, slander and lies.

 

obots don't get to decide if it's a valid issue. so is a hole in national security. you too jeff.

 

Jeff It has always been nothing BUT a very valid CONSTITUIONAL issue. That is why it continues. It doesn't continue because it has anything to do with a BC. It is a basic Constitutional issue of prime importance to every American, even you tho you don't see that. Just because you ineptocrats can not see that is your problem. Personally the only reason I see that a BC is needed is to prove his daddie is not a U.S. citizen and even that is moot is because Obama has already verified he is not making Jr ineligible. You ask about republicans producing their BC. I do know that when Trump was considering running he immediately produced his. Bachmann has said she would produce hers IF ASKED. Maybe you should write her and ASK. I would like to see EVERY PRESIDENTIAL candidate to produce their eligibility and background documentation. Obama has not done any of this even 5 years after he was nominated by the DNC. But since there is no republican candidate for President nominated by the RNC we can't ask for the documentation yet. I would urge you to make it a point to ask whomever is the RNC candidate to produce their documentation and I would back you in doing so. As far as Obama being the only President to have been asked for documentation I would agree with you. He is the only PERSON who has sat in the White House who has never presented or allowed to be presented ANY of his eligibilty or background documentation. So it only stands to reason he is the only one who has ever been asked to produce it. It seems as tho the only people that do not want to see these documents are ineptocrats devoted and pledge alleigence to a man and not the Constitution. Eisenhower even after a long and brilliant military career KNEW he needed his BC in order to show he qualified to be President. He went and got it and registered it in his county of birth with the county clerk to prove he was eligible. When it came to the Constitution he was a much smarter man than Obama. When it comes to honesty and upholding the Constitution he did. Obama has no inkling as to what that even means. "A person who does not want to seek truth is enslaved to their own ignorance" - RS .This is a perfect description of an ineptocrat


It really really really sucks to be an ineptocrat.

 

Are you saying that Eisenhower never had a US passport or any birth record in the military until he ran for President?

Obama has had a US passport since he was six years old.. His place of birth would be listed... in the US.

 

This is, of course, just another stupid Birther fantasy.

1. He did nothing to get a Birth certificate. It was entirely an effort by a third party that he apparently did nothing to encourage or reward.

2. It was not acquired for any reason having anything to do with the presidency.

3. It would not have met the State Department standards for proof of citizenship at birth anyways. It was not filed within a year of the birth... rendering it worthless as proof of citizenship.

 

Its not an issue at all if you can READ.

Natural-born citizen

Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?

The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes citizenship.

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"

* Anyone born inside the United States *
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.

http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html