On terrorism, why you should never listen to the liberals

My grandkids will live longer than that.

 

Our nation is ran by tiny minorities. There's no smaller demographic than a couple hundred billionaires.

To the point their opinions are pushed as fact through every inch of society, whether finance, media or academia. The last being the worst, as they charge kids a lifetime of debt for the honor of being programmed.

 

You forgot to mention GW Bush handling poorly Iraq and Afghanistan, but OH! I get it, he's Republican and you give a Free pass to Republicans on everything. Pure and Simply you're a Hypocrite of the worst kind.

 

And you grandkids' grandkids' grandkids' will still live in an America where less then 5% of the population is Muslim.

 

Unfortunately, that is not The Plan.

For some strange reason, before my grandkids are dead "They" expect the population to be about 50% Muslim. I wish now I had saved the link to that.

Anyway, as a reminder, even if you are correct, this is what we would have:

"From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world."


I'm already seeing halal food in my local supermarket, so I would guess Islam is able to fast track things in countries that defend religious freedom...rather ironic, since after they take over there tends to be no such thing.

 

There is no way to get Muslims to be 50% of the population of the US short of nuclear holocaust where 50% of the US population is wiped out and America recolonized by Muslims.

I see kosher food in my supermarket all the time. Does that mean we've been conquered by Jews?

 

This is too easy, right?

Somebody else has to be laughing besides me.

 

They can do it in the next 40 years or so if they achieve their goal of bringing in a million or more a year and keep up their high reproduction rates.

Meanwhile, the reproduction rates of our working and middle classes will be lowered even more as we pay school taxes to pay for all the special education their children will need as a result of inbreeding, generational opium exposure, cultural and language differences, etc etc. I'm hoping the posters that know more about some of these genetic concerns and learning issues will full post threads on them in here.

Anyway, as a reminder, we would then:


At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%


Since we're already nearing the 40% rate as far as chronic terror attacks go, I guess thanks to the number of naive SJWs on the planet Muslims have decided to speed up their schedule.

 

1 million immigrants a year would be more than all other US immigrants combined. It's a bull(*)(*)(*)(*) number you pulled out of your ass.

 

They're hoping to drag in about 850,000 "refugees" next year; that's not all that much less than a million...and apparently that's just for starters if Hillary gets in.

 

That's the total for all refugees. You understand America gets refugees from non-Muslim countries too, right?

 

Link?

I realize, however, that Trump's very public stance on this has probably had its political effect in terms of how overt future planning will be.

The lack of coordination with local government and education workers has been alarming and offputting.

 

Link for what? That that is total for all refugees or that we get refugees from non-Muslim countries?

Because both are easily demonstrable.

 

Both, since you offered.

 

Psychology and psychiatry refuses to use medical techniques that would uncover the unconscious programming of Muslims that would expose the reasons for their fanaticism.

The only Americans that are actually constitutionally working for peace, an end to terrorism, are Americans who advocate that psychology expose the unconscious programming. All the rest are dancing with the devil.

 

Too bad the Only thing the right has, is Orwellian, right wing fantasy.

 

http://m.voanews.com/a/us-to-resettle-85000-refugees-in-fy-2016/2972001.htm

The current US refugee quota is 85,000 per year. Kerry/Clinton want to increase that to 100,000.

You are off by a factor of ten.

http://m.immigrationpolicy.org/?url...-facts/refugees-fact-sheet&utm_referrer=#3092

More than 60% of US refugees come from non-Muslim nations.

 

Over a quarter of all refugee arrivals (26.4 percent, or 18,469) in FY 2015 came from East Asia — a region that includes China, Vietnam, and Indonesia.

Doesn't that seem odd? Doesn't there have to be war displacing you to be a refugee?

Sorry, I know off topic. I was just checking out your link.

 

No. You've never heard of "political asylum" before?

Ever heard of "natural disasters"? Those cause refugees all the time.

 

So Tibet? If we are taking in people because of an earthquake, that's absurd. Pretty sure there's dozens of nations between us and them for that.

 

We have the ability to take care of refugees. Many of those nations don't. And those that do take in waaaaaaaay more than we do.

 

Yeah, that's a good point. But still, don't understand why we can't put them in Puerto Rico or Guam. Maybe takeover a couple other islands for them.

The "can't expand" is all in people's heads. Israel with fences on wheels pretty much proves that.

 

Puerto Rico and Guam barely have infrastructure to support the people there.

 

Thank you. So those figures are apparently what the Obama administration is admitting to, according to the second link.. (The first link is no longer current).

 

"is admitting to"

Translation: I don't have contravening evidence from anywhere except unidentified sources on Rightwing wackjob blogs so I'm just going to make the whole thing a conspiracy theory.