Palestinian Statehood officially acknowledged.

From your CBS source:

 

So few kids dying is okay, to satify pervert Rabbi's in a satanic sexual ritual?

 

No, it's not okay. My point is that you make it out to be a widespread practice when in perspective it's a rarity.

Let me ask you a question Jack. You have this incredibly intense and negative fixation with all things Jewish. What would you like the fate of the Jews to be and why?

 

Isn't it obvious? but what i'd like to know is the same question answered by moon?

 

Well how about it Jack? Cat got your tongue?

 

I think its pretty obvious what Jack wants to happen with the jews. He wants them to be destroyed and thrown out of their country then locked up in muslim prisons. I'm wondering if Jack approved of the holocaust?

 

Apparently Jack has quietly left the building.

 

Just out of interest what's your view of treating non-Jews on the Sabbath?

 

I do it all of the time.

 

So you reject the ruling of the Israeli courts that it's okay to refuse treatment to non-Jews on the Sabbath. Good to hear.

 

I'm not familiar with that ruling. Is refusal to treat non-Jews an option or requirement?

 

You mean this question ?

You're a relative newbie so you may not be aware of the dozens of occasions wherein I've stated very clearly- no ambiguities whatsoever- that I have nothing against jews per se. My contention is with Zionism, a racist doctrine of ethnic cleansing. Adherents of that doctrine are ********s. Those that are jewish are jewish ********s. So the question posed is both insulting and stupid. ' Jews ' don't illegally occupy Palestine and ethnically cleanse its indigenous people. Zionists do- jewish, christian or otherwise.
Now that you're aware of the difference I suggest that you act upon it yourself. Otherwise you'll find yourself opposed and ridiculed , like several others here, on account of an overt support for ********s and their racist doctrine. Your choice.

All United Nations member States voted on the recognition of the Palestinian State on the pre-1967 borders. The outcome was 138-9 in favour. So ' the fate ' of jews- as posed by the dumb question- is to gtf out of Palestine and go home. Why ? Because all those who support Palestine have moral integrity and respect for international law.
The Palestinians have offered citizenship to any squatters who choose to stay.

 

If memory serves the State of Israel is also a member of the United Nations. Yet a fellow member nation, the State of Palestine, refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist.

The Palestinian Authority makes no attempt to educate its people towards peace and coexistence with Israel. On the contrary, from every possible platform it repeatedly rejects Israel's right to exist, presents the conflict as a religious battle for Islam, depicts the establishment of Israel as an act of imperialism, and perpetuates a picture of the Middle East, both verbally and visually, in which Israel does not exist at all. Israel's destruction is said to be both inevitable and a Palestinian obligation.

How patently hypocritical of the Palestinians.

 

Simply a very silly comment . The Palestinians have long since agreed to recognise Israel on the pre-1967 borders. What advantage is it to you to post such erroneous guff ?

 

It's not silly in the least. It's fact. Hamas in its charter refuses to acknowledge Israel's right to exist and indeed calls for Israel's destruction. It makes no reference to pre-1967 borders.

 

I see no evidence of Moon being obsessed with Jews.

 

Of course not. It's a 1980's document which bears no signatures at all, let alone those of the current Palestinian leadership. It's as relevant as The protocols of the Elders of Zion.

 

JB;

I suggest that you read #613 again, before you scurry off back into Bourneland.

 

Please supply a source for this lie.

If you are referring to Israel Shahak's letter to Haaretz, then you should do a little more research. You'll find that there is NO such Israeli law and there is also no such religious law.

 

There is one member in particular on here who regularly uses the Jew epithet in almost every post. One can therefore reasonably conclude that the said poster is principally motivated by an anti-Jew agenda. That some other posters' tag on such hatred to other posters like moon with the intention of conflating attacks on the ideology of (Neo) Zionism with Judaism and Jews per se, is disingenous and in many cases used to mask legitimate criticism of the said ideology.

I believe that the pro-Israeli crowd - as well as those opposed to the evil ideology that is political (Neo) Zionism - have a collective responsibility to expose both neoNazis AND (Neo) Zionists in our midst. To their credit, some posters have managed to successfully expose the former. However, they tend to remain silent in terms of the latter.

For the record, I do believe that our resident Jew-hater's obsession with anti Jewish rhetoric does mean that it is often hard to distinguish such views with that of the Nazi-sympathizers he is so keen on distancing himself from. That's not to say, that some of his arguments are not legitimate, because they clearly are, rather he often uses them a cover for his own hatred.

So on the one hand, we have posters' who disingenuously conflate legitimate critiques of (Neo)Zionism with an alleged hatred of Jews as their cover for defending the indefensible actions of the Israeli state (eg.Liebe), and on the other hand, we have at least one poster who exploits the plight of the Palestinian's at the hands of the Israeli state, for his own nefarious ends (ie Jack). Both positions are equally partisan and wrong. Two wrongs do not make a wrong right.

 

This thread is closed, over 500.....