scott e.'s new birther thread...

No evidence to support that either. One dozen more or less doesn't matter.

The American people from actual evidence are concerned about real things, like the economy, not Birther make believe.

mountains of evidence, more coming everyday...

yet, you still haven't shown us one bit of admissable evidence- not one tiny iota. You would mistake a molehill for the Himilayas.


wizkid frank cannot recreate the scan. why he would want to be right all the time ... he evaded the question about it 7 times... why??

I never saw Wong say he couldn't recreate the scan. He is not evading it- he has you on ignore- because he said he would if you callled him Frankie- and you called him Frankie. You disrespected him, and he put you on ignore. Not that you ever answer anyone elses questions- frankly why should any of us indulge your conspiracy speculation?

Just to repeat- not one bit of evidence- not a single bit that wouldn't be laughed out of any court and possibly have the attorney sanctioned for wasting the courts time. All Birthers have is speculation, innuendo and lies. But they call them evidence.

 

Two dodges.

 

you guys should get a room... don't forget you guys are just as brainwashed to me as i seem to you... anyway, i'll be at politicalbuddies.com from now on if you want to continue. i can't tell you everything i know just now. i can't spend my best political capital on you wastoids... tell wong if he wants to man up to corsi's challange... foggy too... LOL.... leave rahl here...

 

The difference is we're sane.

You said you were leaving 100 posts ago. You'll be back.

I like that you claim you can't tell us everything you know... So you have evidence the President is an illegal usurper, but you refuse to reveal it? That's treason.

See you in a couple hours when you post again here!

 

Don't let the door hit you as you run out.....

Another birther claims to have bitten the dust.

I will believe it when I see it.

 

Two things.

a) note the name calling. Rather ironic after some of the rants.
b) note that once again Wash dodged challenges to prove any of his claims- this time by apparently going to a more sympathetic forum- or is some right wing dating service?

 

An airport toilet stall?

 

that got you interest frenchie.. where you been ??

 

Hows the dating going on Politicalbuddies? Found that Birther life partner yet? Corsi paying enough to afford dating?

 

isn't this kind of talk against the rules ? should i run to the moderator and tattle ??

LOL can i be banned from my own thread ? one way to win the argument i guess..

 

so the hawaiian tv station that reported the court case won't release the video of the orly taitz interview after the case was continued... mmm more transparency from hawaii... i even offered to buy it from them.

 

I always been here... I'm still waiting for your appology for that racist personnal attack earlier.

BTW I'm still not a frenchie...

 

btw, my little ankle biting friend, i'm still not offering... but i'm pleased to have you here, if you can be pleasant and non mechanical, like say rahl for instance. the jury is still out on whether or not he is a real human, or rahlwong, or both... or neither..

i know you are not really french, so by definition, it was not racist. you aren't french at all for generations, you say, so i will call you "canadian boy who soars with the eagles" from now on. so glad you are defending our man in the oval... i do love canadians, and as jerry seinfeld once said, if you like the race it's not racist. yes canadian is a race. have fun here, but if you keep repeating "it suck to be birther" and "my little troll", or anything else i deem to be toxic... i have to have you removed from this discussion (which apparently isn't hard to do). this your only warning. don't forget i live on the quebec border, so i have much experience with the people there.

 

Well, firstly you aren't a mod so you can't ban anybody.

Two, you are using troll tactics like never presenting proof of anything you advance, so calling you a troll is in fact telling the truth and you can't get ban for speaking the truth. On the other hand you can get ban for telling lies, ask Appuzo...

And lastly, it really suck to be a birther, that is a fact of life....

 

Now a TV station is in on the conspiracy too?

LOL

In other news, no action on Taitz' case yet. I expect it to be dismissed any day now.

How much do you want to be Taitz won't even know how to properly serve the DOH with the Notice of Hearing?

 

Oh my god- a TV station won't give you their property....another example of the vast Hawaiian conspiracy.....

Because of course there aren't enough video's of Orly spouting her idiocies already available.

 

...

...

...

... Indeed.

 

right into the vault... no free speech here... move along... nothing to see on tv...either.. that tape would have been my ticket back to current events... rats, i was so hoping to climb out of miscellaneous.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjK2Oqrgic"]Nothing to see here - YouTube[/ame]

 

what's up with wasting the multi quote with dots ?? i think there is a rule for that... indeed those witty reparte's don't further my cause, and they are always in response to intimidation, you left that part out counselor...

the day rahlwong, or any of you actually irritate me will be the day i vote for your messiah, whobamavich the vacation golf guy. nice try though boys...

 

don't have to be, just have to ask...

here's my proof. wong can't recreate the forgery as a scan (because it's not a scan). and he won't talk about why. since he is lightyears ahead of all of you put together intelligence wise, that's my final proof. occum's razor. and my ignoring your fluffy speculation just means i'm ignoring your fluffy pathetic little cries for attention, no offense. if your premise was true, wouldn't i be banned. apuzzo was banned because he was a birther getting too close to the truth, and frank and the fogbow hilbillies didn't like that so much. and if i do find he was at the lakin trial (frankwong), say a photograph, we're going to have some real problems. so far he hasn't commented.

 

Ask away and see where it gets you...

Are you arguing about a PDF or about the BC... Because the BC has nothing to do with the PDF. And in any case Hawaii has declared it to be conform to the original document. They are the only authority that can do that.

LOL talking about intelligence when you don't even understand what Occam's Razor is about (not Occum's silly).

As for your banning, I guess it depends on the mods and how many racial personnal attack you make.

Appuzo was banned for having multiple account and constantly lying and deforming what other or what the sources said.

Keep at it and you'll probably get there too.

 

What is implicated with regard to free speech? The TV station is a private entity which is refusing to turn over to you their private property.

Once again showing the birthers have a glaring disrepect and misunderstanding of the Constitution.

 

i will if you get nasty.. this is my thread and you have to go out of your way to challenge me here... read my original post so we understand each other. being a birther doesn't mean i will take crap from anybody, especially from a distant country like quebec. so you're back to being french ? you said you weren't, are you lying about that ? i mean which is it ??

william of ockham actually "the simplest explaination is usually the best" (in any country). since my dad was a research pysicist that went to mit when he was sixteen and had a ph. d. in physics, i think i know ockham's razor. i grew up in the lab. i never pretend or pose what i know. i am a simple musician and a terrible speller, that i will grant you. but why am i explaining this to you, you're stuck in canada without the stanley cup. but i'm just so glad to see you back. like obama, you're not even a citizen of america, so discussing the issue with you is a pig in a poke, like the former senator. kenya understand what i'm saying ??

The idioms pig in a poke and sell a pup (or buy a pup) refer to a confidence trick originating in the Late Middle Ages, when meat was scarce, but cats and dogs (puppies) were not.[1][2][3] The idiom pig in a poke can also simply refer to someone buying a low-quality pig in a bag because he or she did not carefully check what was in the bag.[4]

 

It isn't your personnal forum friend. If you have a beef with my posting then report it. If not then stop with your empty threat...

And your trolling continue I see... BTW 17 of the players in the Bruins team that won the cup are Canadian... Only 3 are American... So the cup is still in Canadian hands.

And you can stop with your racist innuendo, because that can really get you banned here...

As for your father being bright... Well I would question your mother about it... It would sure explain a lot....