What do people think? My dad says they do somewhat dived us even further as a nation. I do agree somewhat that these organizations tend to use the dived and conquer techniques that they say they are against. However, I also see the merits in things like the NNACP or the pole bearers which was the being of the NNACP. However, I do not see the merits in things like the KKK that is racist against all minorities or la razza which has called for the death of all white people in some of their speeches.
I'm Mexican American and have never had to use AA or have test standards lowered for me. The racist elitist white liberals see non-whites as inferior and needing a 'head start'.
Prohibiting racial organizations would violate the Right of Association found in the Due Process Clause of the US Constitution. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958 )
This is somewhat a question on what people think and hypothetically if it's not against the constitution. Think in those terms.
When I read racial organizations, I also think of HBCUs. I do not believe that we should do away with things like the HBCUs. As for the other racial organizations, many of them work to better their specific racial group, though they speak in mostly inflammatory language. That said, I like to see groups work in my favor and rather not see them go away even if that favor is based on race.
We really should completely do away with organizations that focus on race, for ANY reason. The reality is that within another 200 years, we will be a completely inter-bred species, with no "White", "Black", or "Oriental" racial types any more. That will be a very good thing, and the best way to just go ahead and proceed toward that day is to quit making a big (*)(*)(*)(*)ing deal out of race right here and now!
How do communities form? The people have to have something in common. Some sort of desire to get along with others with similar beliefs. Now keep this in mind. Let's say that Person A is a bicyclist, loves to bike everywhere he goes and he has all the clothing for it. He wears that while biking one day and comes across Person B, who is as much as bike enthusiast as Person A. They have something to bond over (their love of biking). So a community is possible between these two people. Now let's say Person A and Person B are just walking down the street, wearing normal clothing. Unless they know each other beforehand, there is no community between them. After all, you can't tell who a bicyclist is just by looking at him. So what does this mean? If there are clear indicators for community, communities will form faster. Race is one such indicator. It's not too hard to tell who's black and who isn't. So forming groups around race isn't too hard to do, nor is it a bad thing. It means people can easily find a place to go and develop connections. Connections are good. It means that a person has a way to advance himself in the world.
I think ones for promoting blacks and Jews should be made illegal. Blacks have their own community, if they don't want to make anything of it then at least they still have each other. Jews live secretly among us and therefore only use their institutions as a weapon when it suits them. As for the other races, they should be allowed to have institutions that help them. An asian or Indian engineer ( for instance) can not always look to his own community for work. This is why we see so many running green grocers and bakeries and nails salons. I've known Aussie born and bred professionals who find it exceedingly hard to get a job. Discrimination is very real. Except for Jews and Blacks. Italians have lived here for generations and they've assimilated and the whiter majority has reciprocated. The same will happen with Asians. Jews and blacks just use their minority status as a weapon.
My statement was utterly mundane. the ADL and AIPAC are vastly bloated and powerful organizations. Most Jews don't have Jewish names and don't look particularly Jewish.They really do prefer to keep it secret too. They wouldn't have the foggiest how bigotry feels, not the foggiest.
Too late. [h=3]National Association for the Advancement of White People[/h] The National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) is a name that has been used for several white nationalist organizations in the United States,[SUP][1][/SUP] deriving its name from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.[SUP][/SUP] The first organization was originally incorporated on December 14, 1953 in Delaware by Bryant Bowles. The following year an article was written on the organization by Time magazine.[SUP][3][/SUP] In September 1955, the Deputy Attorney General of Delaware took action to revoke its corporate charter. In 1979 David Duke left the Ku Klux Klan and incorporated a new group taking the name of the defunct National Association for the Advancement of White People. [SUP][4][/SUP] It was headquartered in Metairie in unincorporated Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, a suburb of New Orleans. The group has been considered by civil rights advocacy group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, to be a racist organization who distribute "their own hateful propaganda" to white schoolchildren in America.[SUP][/SUP] The organization's views included opposition to affirmative action programs and a strong law and order stance, such as favoring the death penalty and three strikes laws. Its official slogan is: "Equal Rights For All — Special Privileges For None." The slogan was presumably taken from the seventh of the Ocala Demands of the United States Populist (or People's) Party of 1890." White peeps. Just can't cut a break.
We shouldn't force people like the KKK and NNACP to disband or whatever. America is a free country. Nothing left of those groups but bitter clingers who live and breathe "Race"/"Sex". The more time that goes by, the dumber those kinda people look. The "Race" issue is sooooo dying. The left tries to stoke the flames of racism, sending it's best "race oil" salesmen out like ambulance chasers to exploit every racial incident for there own gain, but the people are buying into it less and less.
Thanks for revealling you are Jewish. I'll put you on ignore. I don't need the angst. As I said, discrimination is real. I would not be welcome on Stormfront. I have no issues with a multicultural society. Goodbye.
No, honey - I'm not Jewish. That was hilarious. Originally Posted by Independant thinker I think ones for promoting blacks and Jews should be made illegal."
It's a place for white supremacists / nationalists who hate jews, blacks and gays. David Duke's buds and such. Yooooge website catering to racists and anti-Semites.