Source - Rahm Emanuel involved in Cain sexual harassment accuser attacks

Only because the male "accuser" works for Perry.

But he got into the act AFTER Politico ran the initial story that created the "news" for everyone else to talk about.

 

That's why Cain is accusing Rick Perry..

Cain has bigger problems than abuse of power by an employer.

 

Rahm Emanuel also credits himself of pushing NAFTA through when it was about to die. Nice guy.

 

I don't know what other evidence linking to Perry that Cain may have.

But I'm sure the pro Obama libs at Politico are not going to tell Cain where they got the story from.

 

Obama has NOT commented on the Cain story.. He's busy.. too busy to indulge in this BS.

If you back Cain, Perry, Bachman or Palin... You are sure to be disappointed.

America doesn't need slogans and colorful personalities.. It needs serious thought and dedication even when the going is tough.

 

I thought he was blaming racism and Rick Perry?

 

so you think Cain is just dishonest and gullible?

 

Cains campaign mgr said he went to work for Perry a couple days before politico notified them of the story

 

No thats still the warped logic used to justify why obama won in the first place, and its still wrong.

 

Of course not.

Obama has flunkies in the lib news media to stir the pot for him.

Any of those people would be better than Obama.

But I am not leaning toward one of them as my first choice although I had high hopes for Perry when he first announced.

 

Oh honey... the other choice was McCain and Palin.. Of course Obama won.

 

Yes, which sounds like the same sort of circumstantial evidence that the lib news media is smearing Cain with now.

 

Because you didnt read 1 article ? Cain ADMITTED he settled in a case of sexual harasment wich at first he denied, he ten gave several figures a lot below the amount that was settled for (several times as much as he "recalled") .

Those are facts, admitted by cain himself, yet you seem to doubt cain own words. Of course seeing how many times he changed it, you might be right.

Complete lies its fact as cain himself admitted .

 

lol how quickly Herman became untrustworthy.

well if hes lying about the Perry campaign being behind it....maybe hes lying about the allegations as well.....

 

Compared to cain & bachmann McCain & palin seems a sane choice .

 

I don't know if Cain used the word "harassment" or not.

In fact it's my impression that he denies harassing anyone.

But it's really a trivial matter in any case.

 

I find is very comical that Cain can't remember this event from 12 years ago.

Would YOU forget that you had been accused of abuse of power by employees and that the Restaurant Association had to settle ????

 

Again then why did cain admit to all the facts?

 

Does every person you happen to disagree with have to be lying?

Cain may know something about the source of the story that the public doesn't know.

Or he could simply be making a wrong assumption.

 

I don't think Cain as admitted to every slimy charge that libs have been making about this story.

 

not to mention having discussed it when he ran for senate in 2003.....AND having 10 days before politico ran the story to refresh his memory....

still nothing

 

I agree however your sentence was misworded.

What should have been said is

'The Republicans better get serious if we want America to win"

the 2012 election is not about D vs R. It's bigger than that. It's about doing what's right for the good of the country vs repeating a mistake made in 2008

 

how is electing the most liberal republican in a century going to save america?

 

Republicans need to explain what they plan on doing to bring back jobs, and replace Obama's health care with.

Cutting spending by billions that will effect many poor and elderly won't win them that much support come next Nov.

 

Americans had no choice in 2008.. unless you think McCain and Palin were a competent ticket.