Source - Rahm Emanuel involved in Cain sexual harassment accuser attacks

That would have raised taxes 10-20 on the poor?

Winding down iraq? Resolving lybia without 1/1000 the cost and human lives?

Yeah look at him .

 

I ask you to prove the statements you made and this is your respons? LMAO

Again YOU calimed something all I ask is evidence of that. Or do you mean having to prove something is liberal? Well there you can be right in, republicans never let lack of facts stop them.

Denying he settled isnt nitpicking, that deliberatly lying.

Downplaying the amaount payed a day later is even worse he cant say he didnt know anymore by that time .

 

It's hard to throw mud in a vacuum.

There is a double standard in the mainstream media that is much more aggressive toward Republican sex scandals than Democrats.

There has been too little actual facts in this case to warrant even a mention by the lib news media if this were a Democrat.

And if the lib news media reports it that makes it a story just by being reported.

John Edwards fathered an illegitimate child and the rumors were out there but for the longest time the lib news media looked the other way because he was a lib like them.

 

It's not a double standard. Conservatives politicize personal "family values' and claim that "liberalism" is causing family breakups.

Then these family values cons go and have affairs and sleep with male escorts.

See the problem now! If you life by politicizing family values, you die by them. Democrats don't do that. We aren't stupid hypocrites like conservatives are.

 

Where did I say that Clinton was proud?

I suspect he was when the camera wasn't on him the way he was laughing at Ron Brown's funeral till he looked out and realized a camera was recording him.

Then he put on his mourning face again.

But publicly Clinton never bragged about all the bimbo eruptions associated with him.

And if he had Hillary might have hit him with TWO ashtrays.

 

Did Clinton make "family values" a political issue? Nope. Did Cain? Yep.

See your hypocrisy now?

 

I think that's true.

Libs invented sexual misconduct and conservatives learned it from them.

 

You're flailing stupidly!.

Liberals "invented" sexual misconduct. What does that even mean?

Conservative live by their bogus family values, and so they die by them when caught with male escorts.

Grow up and deal with it, or stop politicizing personal relationships.

**********y = pure hypocrisy.

 

It means that liberals believe in sexual freedom and not being constrained by conventional moral standards.

They have always led the way in that area.

 

"Because unlike Democrats like Bill Clinton or John Edwards or Jesse Jackson Cain is embarrassed by these charges"

Wich is BS, clinton reacted just as cain did.

And cain didnt laugh in 12 years?

So you admit he reacted the same, then why did you say he acted different, you make no sense.

 

libs invented ? When did you liberalism was created? When did you think sexual misconduct was acted out first? You dont know much about anything do you?

 

Not the right to sexually harras .

 

This is typical presidential vetting.....

Accusations of sexual harassment by any candidate, Democrat or Republican would be reported on.

Herman Cain is not being picked on by any measure. He's getting the treatment and scrutiny that anyone who seeks to be the president would get. I see nothing out of bounds about most of the reporting.....which revolve around unanswered questions about actual events. People are not conjuring attacks from thin air here.....they're probing for answers and getting conflicting or unsatisfactory explanations about something that actually happened.

Legal action was brought against him. Candidates always have to answer that sort of thing. He should have been more prepared for this..... Because he wasn't, he still has some explaining to do....... Especially if other sides of the story start to come out.

 

I think you're delusional, but even your mischaracterization argues against you.

Progressives don't politicize personal sexual conduct, conservatives do. So conservatives are fair game as to their sexual misconduct and progressive are not.

Live by politicizing sexual conduct, die by it.

Grow up and deal with your own hypocritical ideology.

 

You're forgetting, that was "a vast, right wing conspiracy", according to our current Secretary of State. Bill, in typical leftist fashion stated "I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinski...", yuk, yuk. If you want a hint at what degradation the Left is actually guilty, just examine the slanderous accusations they bestow upon their critics - and also, treat their every word as some form of misrepresentation of reality. Working backwards from that, you'll soon arrive at the reality behind the illusion.

 

The rightwing noise machine is an empirical fact. Clinton was of course correct.

You poor conservatives can't even acknowledge your own successes at spreading disinformation, you're so confused.

 

Ahh, but unfortunately for the defenders of leftist bs, they were right - Bill's perjury wasn't merely right wing noise.

 

Hardly.

How could the entire lib news media miss an illegitimate child by John Edwards?

As for Cain all they needed was the whiff of a story and the lib news media was on him in full force.

In Clinton's case all he had to do was say it ain't so and the media dropped the rumors like a hot rock.

When Palin was the front runner she was attacked in every venue liberals have control over.

Then Bachman looked like the front runner and she was attacks.

Then Perry over a rock on land he didn't even own.

Now Cain gets it and if he drops out or merely falls back in the pack the next challenger to Obama will be raked over the fire then they are no longer a threat.

That's why even though I'm not voting for Cain the lib bloodbath has to stop here or else it never will stop.

 

Sure they do.

Have you never been to a gay pride parade?

 

Through vetting, every presidential candidate will have every legal issue in their past looked at. Cain is not immune from this dynamic. He's just new to it because he's new to the political scene. Most other candidates benefit from having been vetted in a campaign, or multiple campaigns for state or federal office.

Legal issues are one of the first things that get vetted....this is Politics 101.

 

oh yes, it was broke by that conservative outlet the National Enquirer

 

No, but I bet you have.

In any case demanding nondiscrimination is not politicizing one's personal sexual conduct, it's saying it shouldn't be politicized, as the conservative do.

Conservatives claim their personal values are superior to others and use that to claim there is something wrong with gays, etc. If you do that, and get caught with a male escort in bed, like so many conservatives do, you've brought it on yourself.

Poor conservatives, they can't even take responsibility for their own ideology.

 

Of course they are.

Or the blanket response for anyone disliked.

 

"O no no, people give in, we'll go livin' in the past"

Poor conservatives: can't progress beyond the 90s and all their political losses.

By the way, Clinton was acquitted. Jesus, you guys can't get ANYTHING straight.

 

The National Enquirer is clearly outside the lib mainstream media.

It is normally shunned by the mainstream media.

But you had one reporter who was not part of the liberal journalist club and perhaps knew he never would be invited to the parties and tv appearances that other lib journalists aspire to.

So he had nothing to lose by doing his job.