The Darwin Party

Nietzche was mentally ill.

 

At least you're honest.

Seriously, if this is the sort of thing that really goes on in your head, I for one I am glad I don't live in it.

I really don't mean to be offensive when I suggest you get help.

 

Failed attempt at satire.

 

I think he's a teenager that browses 4chan a lot and thinks having edgy ideas is cool. You have to be evil or incredibly immature to hold a view like his. I'm betting it's the latter.

 

Yeah, I am coming to the same conclusion.

That said, if it is the former, and not the latter, rather than calling it 'evil', I would use more modern terminology, I would describe it as being the words of a person with an acute mental health problem.

It is possible that this is genetic.

In other words, it is possible that this disorder was passed down to him by one of his parents. Not the specific thoughts he is relating here - but the disorder.

Which would be rather ironic..

 

He said he would be okay with castration if his genes were not good enough to be passed on.

I'm curious to see who he thinks should make that decision. Would he willingly be castrated if I decided he was genetically inferior?

 

He will likely answer in the affirmative, yet that answer won't be sincere.

Do you think there is a case for him not having kids, based on his own premise?

 

Well, obviously I don't agree with forcing people to not have kids, including him.

Should he? No. I think he needs to grow up, that goes for any busybodies that think authoritarianism is the way to solve problems.

 

If is present frame of mind is representative of who he really is, then my advice would be, don't be a dad, any time soon.

He may pass on bad genes.

No, it would be a far more noble thing for him to do not to reproduce, and let his bloodline die out naturally.

Mind you, in order to actually have kids, you have to, you know...

 

Look at these threads he has made:

http://www.politicalforum.com/opinion-polls/213406-should-fat-people-forced-lose-weight.html

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...13510-why-people-so-gungho-about-freedom.html

So I'm having a hard time deciding if he's a troll or a legitimate fascist.

 

Your darwin party is the dumbest (*)(*)(*)(*) I've ever heard of, and has the most views and responses.

Your perception of Darwinist perception is also way off from the reality of evolutionary control of humanity. You sir, should be moved to the back page of stupidity discussed by the stupidity in the political forum...

 

Well, I'm glad you realize you are a monster. Do the handicapped not have a right to live? Your view of the handicapped and disabled is repugnant, and if you had any shred of a conscience you'd feel ashamed for yourself.

Genetics isn't everything and is never an absolute indicator of what one's contributions to the world.

Wasn't he a chauvinist (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) who had sex with his sister?

 

i say increase the sciences, in order to HELP humanity as it is now. not to change it. let religion stay, it may not have a lead role, but it is needed. increase education standards and all that as well,but you aren't going to get a super human . your outlook on things is a tad flawed...

 

You are not qualified to make that decision, an assembly of geneticists will make the standards for genetic purity. But honestly unless you are a complete knuckle dragging moron, or physically handicapped, you will be fine.

 

The ’t’ should be upper case when it is the first letter in a proper name. 'Timmy'. Additionally, 'heres' is incorrect, it should be here’s as in ‘here is’. I do not know who Timmy is, however I will take his cookie and eat your lunch if I want to. Loosen up Cuz.

Rev A.

 

And who decides that these people are more qualified than me?

 

The fact that you have to ask this question decides that these people are more qualified than you.

 

You just avoided my question.

Who decides who is qualified? The people with the most guns? Your argument boils down to a might makes right justification. The people with the most power decide who is genetically inferior, correct?

 

May I ask you some questions, starting with what age your are?

I just like to get a generational idea.

I am 43.

Jack

 

I would guess he is not older than 30 .....about ahhhh' 15?

Rev A

 

I would say 20 - at the most.

 

I would like to remain anonymous on here including how old I am, but somewhere around 20 is correct.

 

Yes, thanks for the confirmation, I thought so.

I am not asking for your name and address, of course.

Just wanted to get an idea where you are at, in life.

Brothers?

Sisters?

 

I don't see how my age has anything to do with what I believe, if you are saying I only believe in this because I am young and inexperienced then I would disagree, older people's beliefs are more inexperienced because their brains have become hard and don't take in new information as easily as they used to, so they become "stuck in their ways"

 

As much as your position sucks, I have to agree with you that your age is irrelevant to whether or not the position is good.