The Fair Vote

because they are bound by the constitution. They are precluded from leaving the union.

safety, trade etc

 

What does that have anything to do with it?


Again why would a state join the Union if they didnt have the option to leave if especially the house became just a kangaroo court?

 

Already proven false, sorry.

 

Why they joined isn’t relevant. They are precludes from leaving the union.

 

yes, I've already proven your argument false.

 

Proven false

 

The alt left radicals refuse to cite the text of the constitution they are "referring" to. Best to not feed trolls on here anymore. We've done it too often.

 

I am still amused some posters think America is Hotel California, you can check in anytime you like but can never leave..

 

Of course its revenant, they never would of joined a free country if they never could leave.


Common sense, no?

 

yes, I've already proven your argument false.

 

no

 

They can't cite it because it doesn't exist. And of course they know this, so they say, "I already cited it."

 

Sweet- just cite the text of the constitution you're referring to and we can believe you. Easy peasy.

 

Already done. Read the ruling Texas v white.

 

You actually failed to do that. You posted a link to a Court Ruling.

Is it too difficult for you to cite the TEXT from the Constitution that you're referring to? If that's too difficult...feel free not to reply so we know it's such a challenge. If you reply once again, by failing to cite the Constitution text you're referring to...we know the strength of your argument.

Thx!

 

Which cites the specific parts of the constitution preceding states from seceding.

Read the ruling. Or don’t. I don’t give a **** either way. States won’t be able to secede whether you read it or not.

 

It is impossible. Because such text doesn't exist in the treaty.

 

There's no provision that says they can't either. In fact the Constitution clearly states that anything not explicitly spelled out is up to the states. So the Constitution not banning anyone from leaving means states can leave. The official interpretation is that states can't leave unilaterally which is logically consistent with how states join but succession by consent is legal.

 

Hey now... I'm agreeing with you. lol

 

So you would join a gang if you could never leave?

Sounds like one needs a mommy authoritarianism.

 

Huh? The simple facts remain states can not secede.

 

The simple fact they can and have, we live in a nation of freedom.

 

Your argument has already been proven false.

 

Huh ?

Simple fact they can.

Its preposterous to think a person can enter a marriage and no way out if the other person is cheating on them/screwing one over in the land of the free

 

Thank you for once again, refusing to cite the mere text of the constitution that could verify your "claim".

Much appreciated.

Look forward to future discussions when you claim someone "lacks evidence".