The Refugee Rape Gangs of Sweden

Err....It is an increase on preceding years?
Note the data collection method changed from 2005.

Duh. Immigrants are the minority of the population - 20% on 2005, and it would be quite extraordinary to commit the majority of all crimes in the entire country. How many reckless driving offences did they not commit? We are interested in over-representation in violent crimes. Where are those statistics?

Furthermore, the majority of "immigrants" in Sweden are Finnish. At issue here is the Muslim immigrants or refugees. Where are those statistics?

The immigration rate in Sweden ratchetted up in 2006 following deterioration in the Iraq civil war, to about 100 k pa where it held steady until 2012 when it started climbing to peak at 165 kpa in 2015. 2005 statistics are not informative of the position today. Where are the current statistics?

So what?

What is relevant is whether those suspicions were correct.

Did you know that men are suspected more often than women in rape crimes? Should we stop suspecting men of rape?

Can we please see this study?

They are trying not to incite the simmering far-right movements. Their method may indeed have the opposite effect.

 

This nonsense is reminding me of the 6 young black men who was charge and convicted of an awful assault and rape of a jogger in NYC.

Trump yes our hero Trump took out a full page adv in the times calling for them to be put to death and a new term calling wilding came to be.

The only problem was once DNA came along it was found that one man did the rape and he had not connection to the teenagers.

 

Oh they didn't want to, they had to. It was the only way to save a little face for our idiot in chief. Seems there is no limit to the contortions trumps' worshipers will go through to obscure the fact that trump is a complete buffoon.

 

Daily Caller? Are you serious? Do you also use the New York Post for access to serious journalism?

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/daily-caller/

That awful 'news' source has been called on fake news, exaggeration and hyperbole disguised as 'news' so many times I lost count. Explain that.
Suggestion; steer clear of partisan blogs which do nothing but shove someone's opinion down your throat. I'm sure you're more intelligent than that.

 

Citing the right-wing Daily Mail as a source for serious journalism in Britain would be like me citing the New York Post for accuracy in reporting about America. The Mail has been caught lying, exaggerating and fabricating so often that a web forum exposing it has been set up to educate the ignorant and gullible Try harder.

http://mailwatch.co.uk/forum/

 

So as usual you've got no facts to counter and attack the source without a shred of evidence.

Thanks for staying predictable.

 

The Daily Caller blog doesn't deal in facts; it deals in sensationalist hyperbole. If you want to believe every opinion you read, it isn't my problem. Tell me what evidence your source has, other than a second-hand 'quote' from a single Swedish cop. Or there might have been two Swedish cops; I lost count there are so many

http://www.snopes.com/2016/07/28/da...r-tantrum-after-being-debunked-by-snopes-com/

There you go; that's your unimpeachable, honest 'journalism' for you. Enjoy being lied to.

 

Have a laugh at this mate...

http://www.patriotchronicle.com/this-hilarious-video-mocks-the-bizarre-liberalism-in-schools/#

 

Do you enjoy proving me right?

Your far left snopes lied again



and

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/photo-clinton-campaign-confiscates-american-flags-throws-floor/


So spin me another one.

- - - Updated - - -

lol that was pretty good

 

Snopes clearly debunked your pathetic lying little blog. If you can't be bothered to open a link then you are being dishonest; not me or Snopes, so, in an attempt at defending your position you cite another right-wing blog! That takes real genius. Hint; blogs are not news, they are opinion pieces.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/07/28/da...r-tantrum-after-being-debunked-by-snopes-com/


Perhaps you can also explain what's so bloody important about a dumb flag, that it gets the right-wing hysterical?

 

What do you see as the similarities?

I see much more in common to Rotherham https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

 

I knew you couldn't explain the picture clearly showing she had no flags until she was caught. No surprise of course.

Your far left buddies at snopes have been caught multiple times actually lying.

Snopes has been caught lying again, proving that it has a political and partisan agenda and it is willing to mislead and deceive its readers in order to advance the cause of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party establishment. Earlier this year Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton Super PAC, admitted they are spending millions of dollars to employ an army of trolls to “correct” and “push back” against internet users who criticize Clinton.



Correct The Record’s “Barrier Breakers” project admitted in a press release that it pays people to pretend to be Clinton supporters, and claims that thousands of unsuspecting social media users have already been “addressed” by the PAC’s mercenary social media warriors – with the promise that many more will be “corrected” in the near future. Given that Snopes entered the political fact checking game around the same time, and began publishing more political articles than ever before; most of which display a clear Clinton bias – it is legitimate to ask if Snopes is also on the Correct The Record payroll (this totally discredit them…forever in my book)



Ethics Alarms has been tracking the increasing political bias exhibited by Snopes, once the definitive “Urban Legends” web source to identify false stories on the internet, e-mail hoaxes and other pollution of public information.

http://silenceisconsent.net/snopes-caught-lying-hillary-loses-credibility/

And I see you are dismissing the flag now that you've been caught in that fabrication. This is my shocked face.

And of course the DC also caught them lying about their own story:

First, the facts. TheDC reported on Monday about the lack of visible American flags at day one of the convention. Several flags were briefly on stage for the national anthem and pledge of allegiance, at which point they were carried off stage, as the C-SPAN video for Monday clearly shows at the 35:40 mark. Even PolitiFact, which tends to lean to the left, noted that “when the color guard left, so did the physical flag.” After that point, the stage was devoid of any American flags for the remainder of day one.

Do You Think There Were No Flags At The DNC On Day 1?
Yes No

Your Email Address (Required)
Submit and See Results
Completing this poll entitles you to Daily Caller news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
As reported by TheDC, the DNC added flags to the stage for the second day of the convention — Tuesday, July 26. That same day, Snopes writer Dan Evon wrote a “fact-check” article declaring it “false” that: “No American flags were on display at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.”
Evon offered as proof A) a screenshot from PBS’ coverage of day one, taken during the pledge of allegiance — before the flags were removed — and B) the below screenshot of C-SPAN’s day two coverage (visible at the 6:36 mark here) and claimed it was from day one of the convention. In fact, Mallory Weggemann — the paralympic swimmer who gave Tuesday’s pledge of allegiance — can be seen sitting in her wheelchair as the flag-bearers walk past her.

What’s worse, Snopes appears to have ripped that image from left-wing non-proft Media Matters’ coverage of the story. But even Media Matters — known for its misleading claims and hatchet jobs — didn’t claim that the screenshot came from Monday’s coverage. Apparently, it was too much for Evon to actually watch the convention on which he was presenting himself as the authoritative source.

Snopes also used the below Media Matters clip from Fox News as “proof” that flags were present on day one of the convention. But that video, like Snopes’ borrowed screenshot, came from day two of the convention. That clip, like the above image, confirmed TheDC’s report that the flags which were miss

The DC reported it with a picture from day 1. Snopes claimed its pic came from day 1 when it was actually day 2. They lied and you bought it hook line and sinker.

What, your lying eyes deceiving you again? lol

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/28/s...k-of-american-flags-at-democratic-convention/

 

Sorry, but I'll believe Mad magazine over a right-wing blog any day of the week. And then you cite yet another far right blog! Hilarious.

 

That's right. Ignore the reality that Media Matters also refused to report the picture was taken on the first day.

Face reality. You got suckered and don't have the guts to admit it.

 

No, that would be you mate. If the best you can call up for a defense is an opinionated right-wing blogger or two, then all credibility is lost. Do you have any independent sources? Of course not.

 

I just gave you media matters. Don't pretend I didn't. And they certainly are no friend to conservatives and even they don't back up your lying liberal buddies at Snoops.

But go ahead, find ANY news source that claims the pic with the American flags were taken on day 1 and not day 2.

Time to back up your BS.

 

I have sais plenty times before, RWers are in no position, or with moral fortitude, to be accusing others of false narratives.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/27/media/fox-news-guest-sweden-bill-oreilly/
Bildt, who was billed as a "Swedish defense and national security adviser," largely backed a narrative promoted by President Trump that portrays asylum seekers as being responsible for an increase in violent crimes in the country.
"We are unable in Sweden to socially integrate these people," Bildt said of refugees. "These things are not being openly and honestly discussed."
Just one problem: Nobody in the Swedish government has ever heard of Bildt.
"This is not a person who is known to [the government]," said Catarina Axelsson, a press officer at Sweden's foreign ministry.

 

This was about the Daily Caller and a specific phony charge by Snopes.

Before you strap on the super hero tights at least be smart enough to know the context of the discussion.

 

The left wouldn't believe there was a rape crisis if they were being raped. You can't fix liberalism, it's a lost cause.

 

The Daily Caller accusing Snopes

http://www.snopes.com/2016/10/26/daily-caller-caught-lying-again/

https://www.secular.org/news/sca-names-daily-caller-most-unethical-news-publication
Washington, DC – The Secular Coalition for America today named the Daily Caller “the most unethical news publication." The Daily Caller earned the "award" after numerous discriminatory and unethical emails were sent by Christopher Bedford, Associate Editor at the Daily Caller, to the Secular Coalition. The most recent email read, “Take a day off from hating God, kids and babies.” Bedford's actions were supported by Daily Caller Editor in Chief, Tucker Carlson.

 

You really should read what you post before you embarrass yourself.

They claimed DC scrubbed paragraphs and they have zero evidence of it. Not a single screenshot.

And they've been busted lying about DC on the flag story claiming flags were there on day 1 when even Media Matters wouldn't corroborate it.

Try again.

LOL A far left atheist magazine doesn't like a conservative one. This is my shocked face.

BTW, they also have no screenshots or evidence to back up their lies.

Once again you fail to read the links you post.

 

BTW, they also have no screenshots or evidence to back up their lies.
FYI, we are referring to news print, screen shots are not necessary.

 

Consider yourself lucky you have a President at least ready to consider the problem. It's pretty much a unique voice.

The irony of Trump's "Sweden comment": media goes into a derisory, confected meltdown...then the next day Sweden suffers exactly what Trump had apparently mistakenly reported (although he actually misspoke).



Sweet justice. The man is prescient.

Maybe Trump could talk about "last night in Germany" - they need their asses kicking over Alzheimer Angela and her immigration insanity.

 

And another livestreamed rape by Muslims in Sweden:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/772107/Sweden-gang-rape-live-stream-Facebook-Stockholm

 

In case you thought you were joking:

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/...-after-alleged-sexual-assault-by-migrant/amp/

Yes, the lunatic b*tch actually said that.