well that goes without saying the way you dance around trying to trip me and fail at every turn then get all butt hurt when you fail.
Except I've been right about everything I've said, and you haven't even addressed all of the mountains of evidence against your position.
anyone who actually read your posts can see you made a laughing stock out of neoatheists with the nonsense you post, then now trying to cover it by saying you have been right. LOL I lack disbelief, I'm a theist
As I said before, it's like playing chess with a pigeon . All he does is knock over all the pieces, crap on the board, And strut around like he won.
Ok, so you mean because the definition of an atheist is that they don't believe, any atheist that fits that definition therefore fits that definition? I can accept that. I can't accept that it is a relevant example since it is just a repeat of that definition. Also, an all good all powerful god is by definition impossible. But you still haven't given a real world example of something that you can agree doesn't exist like unicorns or the flying spaghetti monster.
I have not looked into it and you have not proven anything one way or another so I have no facts to base any decision on so I abstain, from a vote either way.
Ok, so you agree that the flying spaghetti monster is just as likely to exist as a god. That's progress.