The War on Drugs is a War on Innocent People

I can't really disagree. Those who would inflict their will on others through violence need to be stopped.

 

LOL you seem to be a very confused person. How does that statement conform to your avatar?

 

I'm really not seeing the disconnect between what I said and telling nazis to (*)(*)(*)(*) off. It's pretty much the same thing.

 

Your avatar reads nazi scum wake up its time to die. So you think violence is ok only if it suits YOUR needs.

 

What can I say, I don't like racist (*)(*)(*)(*)s. I don't actually wish violence against them. That said I can agree with jailing those who wish to take the liberties of others away without good cause. Also, I have to admit, I wouldn't really be bothered if Hitler, Goring and friends died in one of those assassination attempts. I know, I'm a bad person.

 

You mean like MLK...

I will not be drawn into a fight with someone over the internet about their INABILITY to understand that pride in ones race does not mean one is a nazi.

 

Your comments in this thread haven't helped.

 

That's wonderful. I don't care.

 

My comments in this thread have had nothing to do with being a nazi or not. My posts in this thread have been about ridding us of the useless junkies. Or did i replace the word junkie with jew?????????????????

No i think not.

 

be careful your ignorance is showing.

 

efjay, My Fing ID,

Stop derailing my thread.




I can't believe that people can regard human beings as trash because of the substances they choose to ingest. It's sickening.

 

It's sickening the YOU class junkies as human beings!

 

What do you define as a "junkie"?

 

You wrote: "How was it grown, did they use hydroponics and power stolen from the grid? how does a junkie get money to fund their habit, drug related crime is just a figment of the world imagination is it?"

These are actions that some drug users might take, not all. You have not shown that possessing, selling, or ingesting drugs actually harms any other individuals, thereby creating a victim. You merely object that some drug users perform other actions that have victims.

 

Then you should insist that your employer not hire junkies. I don't know why you insist that those who ingest drugs be put in cages just because you don't want to work with them. There are lots of people I don't want to work with, including old, blind people, but I don't see any reason to throw old, blind people in cages for that reason. Maybe you do.

 

All drugs are terrible? Or is it just the ones government says are bad? Are they terrible only when someone uses them to get high, and are just fine when someone uses them for other purposes? What if someone gets high from certain drugs, such as oxycontin or ritalin or morphine or even prescribed cocaine derivatives, but also needs them for medicine? It must create a terrible moral dilemma for you to think that some people need medication but actually *enjoy* the side effect of getting high. Or maybe you just practice the same sort of double think that former hippies embrace when they realize their anti-establishment views have been co-opted by the establishment.

There's the establishment view: treat those who use substances of which the government disapproves as diseased in the mind and in need of a "cure." They are abnormal, as how could anyone want to do something of which the powers that be disapprove? If you were a former hippie, you are even worse than the people of whom you rebelled against. You've swallowed the authoritarian progressive view hook, line, and sinker.

So tell us, what horrible things were going on when drugs that are illegal now were legal? When people could buy heroin over the counter at their local pharmacy, were there millions of unproductive junkies sucking off the welfare teat and invading homes for drug money? What sort of bad things did we make go away starting with the Harrison Narcotics Act and eventually the War on Drugs?

 

Most people have no idea. Heroin addiction rates are actually quite lower than most people imagine, with only about 13% of users becoming addicted. More become dependent, but again, most people are hardly aware, in their railings against the evils of non-government approved substance use, of the difference between dependent and addicted. If you don't have a prescription and the government propaganda says it's bad, then you are a criminal for using it, or diseased of the mind.

 

Notice that at the begining of the thread, I asked rtwingafraud if he had ever ingested coffee or alcohol. I asked him multiple times and he ignored me each time. It's hypocrisy, why aren't they thrown in jail for that cup of joe? If their masters approve of the drug then it is automatically okay. All independent thought has been replaced with authoritarian rhetoric in these people.

 

Heck, any 8-year-old child can go to the local Walgreens with his allowance money and purchase soft drinks laced with that addictive mind-altering stimulant.

Along with, of course, psychoactive solvents like Wite-Out.

According to the below chart, several "bad" (i.e. illegal) drugs are safer than caffeine. LSD and shrooms are far safer and less addictive. Why can't children by kid-sized LSD treats from Walgreens too?

 

Probably more so than racists.

 

So can anyone show me the victim when someone shoots up heroin? I'm curious..

 

The toddler who picks up the needle and chews on it simultaneously injuring itself, getting high (thus addicted and thus will live a life of theft/sex acts for heroin), and getting AIDs which is then passed on the to the mother who also accidentally gets needle AIDs and the guy who rapes the both of them. So the moral of the story is that one heroin addict who was high on AIDs killed 3 people.

I mean that's never happened but you're sure to get a scenario similar to that though likely much more boring.

 

Much more boring but just as easy to pick apart..

 

Five year old picks up his dad's bowling ball and accidentally drops it on his foot, severely injuring himself and getting an infection requiring the foot to be amputated. This permanently traumatizes him, so as an adult, he blows away his wife and two children. This is why bowling is a violent act and needs to be banned.

Mom puts drapes over the picture window. The cat climbs the drapes, causing the curtain rod to break and land right in little Cindy's eye, blinding her for life. This is why drape-hanging is a violent act and need to be banned.

Small marble falls out of toy chest...

 

Or drapes land on electric outlet, get between socket and plug and start fire. House burns down, killing little Cindy's entire family and leaving her destitute. Drapes and electrical sockets must be banned.

Besides, drapes get in the way of police looking in the window for illicit contraband, so they are doubly evil.