What are you mumbling? Skin is only skin deep? Is that supposed to mean something profound? What do history of the US and killing to win have to do with crutches? What evidence do you have that negros are equal in cognitive ability to northeast Asians? Please provide one study. One bit of evidence. If not, why?
How can you doubt something if you have no evidence either way? Shouldn't you be neutral or undecided.
The only so-called "proof" I have seen are correlation-equals-causation fallacies. That in itself makes the claims highly dubious.
I never claimed otherwise. Its rather obvious that many of the founders were slave owners, it being perfectly legal at the time. I realize you dream of days gone past as if you have some connection to the founders of the nation, but in all reality its just another example of your need to claim past glory for lack of your own. I see you like to project. Keep beggin those questions. Fallacious logic appears to be the refuge of the racially superior - how's that for pure irony?
False. The sole burden of proof for your arguments is on you, not on your audience to do the footwork for you. You can insult anyone you want for not believing you on face value, but YOU need to defend your arguments. You also need to do something about your grammar while you're at it.
A perfect example of the myth that is "systemic racism." Why is putting black drug dealers in prison to bring down violence in the black community "systemic racism" against black people? You're basically arguing that the feds are doing a better job of protecting black neighborhoods from black predators than they are white neighborhoods from white predators, and somehow this is an expression of white racism. Amazing how many people make this bizarre argument with a straight face. Do you understand that the sentencing laws which came out regarding crack cocaine were a response to the black community accusing the government of not protecting them from crack gang violence? Do you understand that legislation was introduced by a DEMOCRAT? Have you done ANY research?
As has been done globally through human history, including those in the Americas that preceded the white man, yet only white men are attacked for it. I find that suspicious. So you're saying that equality in your eyes necessary means mass eradication of the founding white majority population? You're confusing demographics with subjective terms like "equal" treatment. What is equal treatment to you? Yes, due to bad immigration policy since 1965, whites are being demographically displaced not only in the US but even in Europe. Is that a good thing to you?
You need to defend your arguments and stop pretending the burden of proof doesn't belong to you. I hope you've improved on your grammar since then.
I don't need to defend anything ... I just posted something, get over yourself, you'll survive the trauma
Why make countless posts when you can't defend anything? You can't expect to be taken seriously when you can't even coherently defend your argument without fleeing from the burden of proof and telling other people to do the research for you. It makes you look like you dropped out of school in the 8th grade and never went back.
A) Because I like the point of view and I agree with it. B) I don't need to justify anything with you. C) I'm not making an argument, I'm agreeing with a point of view. D) It's not important to me if you agree with a point of view or not, because it's just a point of view. Z) I don't give a **** what you think of me.
Why would I deny the existence of racists? There are plenty black, white, yellow, brown racists out there. If only white racism concerns you these days it is easy to tell what knind of racist you are if you are curious on how to identify it.
no that doesn't mean you should remain neutral or undecided. A positive claim has to be supported. Otherwise you could claim unicorns exist or leprechauns exist and I'd have to remain neutral versus doubting they exist.
I gave evidence provided in the link. Someone went through trouble to piece evidence together in a coherent and understandable format. Do you have any reason to doubt the existence of unicorns? Until given evidence against their existence i would be neutral. It is also a positive claim to believe single parent households highly correlate with criminality. You simply arbitrarily decided to favor one position over another without good reason.
I have told you twice already I don't read links. If you are too *******n lazy to put the pertinent information in the post I don't see why I should be bothered to read through some link to prove your argument. good for them I don't care I don't read links. Once again if you are too lazy to be bothered was placing the pertinent information in the post I don't know why I should be bothered to read it. lack of evidence. that isn't reasonable. Yes it is. I don't care to prove it to you. So feel free to doubt it. Proving it to you gains me nothing. So I don't feel like wasting my time proving it to you. How do you know it's without good reason? And how do you know it's arbitrary? Those are positive claims that you must prove. So go ahead and tell me how I think this should be good.
Well I don't claim people to be racist without knowing them but apparently logic does not compute with this particular poster. I wonder if she's neutral on whether or not the Earth is flat.
Is that your idea of a cogent researched argument? I realize its a difficult concept to grasp but one result of systemic racism is a far higher poverty level amongst the minorities. Far higher poverty levels, far higher social dysfunction. http://federalsafetynet.com/us-poverty-statistics.html Even a cursory study of systemic racism will yield a veritable laundry list of both its characteristics and consequences over time.
