Why would you believe such a silly thing? https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/main.html ^ Get educated. There are thousands of photos from those missions and undeniably genuine video recordings of great length, and of course that's just a small part of the totality of evidence considering all of the people and technology involved. Don't listen to some dipshits online who ignore the evidence and lack all reason and sense (or are just trolls).
I´m educated. Thats why i know this is fake. And our teacher said so as well. There is no independend scoruce. Why did NASA not take a foreign Astronaut on a mission? The Sovietunion did just that.
Your teacher was retarded? I'm sorry to hear that. And I'm sorry for you if you think hauling a foreign astronaut along was the only way to prove something so obviously true actually took place. Just look at what I've linked you and engage das Hirn.
A NASA page? Seriously? Care to explain why the moon samples we have from lunar meteroits have other isotopes than the ones we got from NASA? The russians took an east german astronaut with them in their Soyuz craft. The russians also gave us samples they took with robotic missions. Suprise the isotopes are same as the lunar meteroites. But the NASA samples are...identical to earth rocks. And no, my teacher is not retarded. It was also in our book, Apollo made several lunar orbits but did definitly not land. Sorry but USA is well known for spreading lies. WMD from Saddam. All that ****. We have a saying here. When an american tells you at night its dark outside, you better watch yourself. We plan our own moon base in next ten years, then we can see and check. Before that we take this story as that what it is. A story.
SELENE Pics, Chandrayaan-1 Chang'e2 The Moon Programme That Faltered, Kettering Grammar School Yea no neutral or independent part You believe what you want to believe, point is that Germany has had zero people on the moon well USA has had 12. Some random internet dude lol at least some random internet dude is smart enough to know that America went to the moon Apollo 11 Main article: Apollo 11 The Bochum Observatory director (Professor Heinz Kaminski) was able to provide confirmation of events and data independent of both the Russian and U.S. space agencies.[14] A compilation of sightings appeared in "Observations of Apollo 11" by Sky and Telescope magazine, November 1969, pp. 358–59. At Jodrell Bank Observatory in the UK, the telescope was used to observe the mission, as it was used years previously for Sputnik.[15] At the same time, Jodrell Bank scientists were tracking the unmanned Soviet spacecraft Luna 15, which was trying to land on the Moon.[16] In July 2009, Jodrell released some recordings they made.[17] Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module.[18] Recordings made by Baysinger share certain characteristics with recordings made at Bochum Observatory by Kaminski, in that both Kaminski's and Baysinger's recordings do not include the Capsule Communicator (CAPCOM) in Houston, Texas, and the associated Quindar tones heard in NASA audio and seen on NASA Apollo 11 transcripts. Kaminski and Baysinger could only hear the transmissions from the Moon, and not transmissions to the Moon from the Earth.[14][19] Apollo 12 Main article: Apollo 12 Paul Maley reports several sightings of the Apollo 12 Command Module.[citation needed] Apollo 13 Main article: Apollo 13 Chabot Observatory calendar records an application of optical tracking during the final phases of Apollo 13, on April 17, 1970: Rachel, Chabot Observatory's 20-inch refracting telescope, helps bring Apollo 13 and its crew home. One last burn of the lunar lander engines was needed before the crippled spacecraft's re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere. In order to compute that last burn, NASA needed a precise position of the spacecraft, obtainable only by telescopic observation. All the observatories that could have done this were clouded over, except Oakland's Chabot Observatory, where members of the Eastbay Astronomical Society had been tracking the Moon flights. EAS members received an urgent call from NASA Ames Research Station, which had ties with Chabot's educational program since the 60's, and they put the Observatory's historic 20-inch refractor to work. They were able to send the needed data to Ames, and the Apollo crew was able to make the needed correction and to return safely to Earth on this date in 1970.[5] Apollo 14 Main article: Apollo 14 Corralitos Observatory photographed Apollo 14.[5][20] Apollo 15 Main article: Apollo 15 Paul Wilson and Richard T. Knadle, Jr. received voice transmissions from the Command/Service Module in lunar orbit on the morning of August 1, 1971. In an article for QST magazine they provide a detailed description of their work, with photographs.[21] Apollo 16 Main article: Apollo 16 Jewett Observatory at Washington State University reported sightings of Apollo 16.[5] At least two different radio amateurs, W4HHK and K2RIW, reported reception of Apollo 16 signals with home-built equipment.[22][23] Bochum Observatory tracked the astronauts and intercepted the television signals from Apollo 16. The image was re-recorded in black and white in the 625 lines, 25 frames/s television standard onto 2-inch videotape using their sole quad machine. The transmissions are only of the astronauts and do not contain any voice from Houston, as the signal received came from the Moon only. The videotapes are held in storage at the observatory.[24] Apollo 17 Main article: Apollo 17 Sven Grahn of the Swedish space program has described several amateur sightings of Apollo 17
All this bullshit aisde i said several times that the apollo crafts did indeed orbit the moon but did not land. So numbers of humans on moon was 0 to this day. Whats your problem with this? Does it hurt your little ego when we laugh about your moon story? What does it change for you that the majority of humanity doesnt believe your moon story? Polls say in the UK 52% think it was fake. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/moon-landing-celebrates-47th-anniversary-8446862 In Germany its around 80% who think its a fake story. You should not put so much effort into this comrade. If it matters so much for you, then you can believe it. The majority over here think its a fake story. So why is it so important for you to convince us?
Why don't you go read the hyperlinks. It dosn't hurt me, what hurts me is how you can be so blind to what the evidence is You have images of the lower half of hte LEM up there, you even have sat. pic too. Face it dude man landed ont he moon and those men were Americans
First, NASA, and especially the NASA people (+ countless private contractors) who worked on Apollo, have **** all to do with Saddam and WMDs. Second, it sounds like you've been bullshitted about isotopes. Got something substantive to share about that? Third, yes, seriously, a NASA page. One hosting thousands of digitized photographs from the lunar surface, which was documented in most exhaustive and boring detail imaginable. You can see where every sample came from, and see 360 degrees around each of the sites, plus plenty more. Fourth, we both know that you've pushed the "hoax" out to a genuine lunar orbit because that's the most plausible-sounding way to argue for it, at least on the surface (har!), but if you're going to send trained astronauts who had no reason to participate in a grand hoax and lie about it for the rest of their lives (and they have all been living long lives and dying of natural causes, I might add), and who would not have been very well equipped to do so given their backgrounds, and send them out there with working, thoroughly tested equipment which they were trained to operate, you might as well just have them land on the moon! They were pilots and scientists - good, honest, intelligent, capable and competent astronauts, NOT actors or deceivers. Apollo 11 was the first one to land because 10 missions prior to it underwent extensive training and preparation. The landers were built and tested, the men were trained to land and work on the lunar surface. You think NASA would go all that trouble, then just send several missions out to orbit the moon while trained astronauts pretended to land? It's a ridiculous accusation to make, a ridiculous idea in the first place.
Shame Russia can't get a craft out of earth orbit successfully anymore. Otherwise maybe they could go and get a shot of Apollo artifacts from lunar orbit the way other craft have already done in recent years to prove the obvious to poor deceived Sobo.
I dont watch that stuff. The majority of people doesnt believe it. Its a big fantasy. If its so important for you, thats ok. What matters for me is that we plan a moon base and test new technologies there. Your fantasy story has not that much influence on that.
It was a big propaganda show. As i said, its an american thing. If you need it for your ego, ok but dont make us part of this farce. The big majority in Germany 78% says it is fake. What does it change for you? Is your Ego so small that you need others amazement to feel good?
With all due respect but i laugh my ass off when they post dozens of links to convince me about this moon rubbish. It gets me through nightshift with some laughs.
Popular opinion doesn't alter the facts, Sobo. Lots of people believe in God and creationism, doesn't make their beliefs true. I just take issue with ****wittery, claiming that a historical event didn't take place, that it was hoaxed. I would defend the manned moon landings all the same if it had been Germany or the USSR that had accomplished them, especially if we had the same wealth of evidence available that we do for the Apollo missions. I just wonder what need you have to believe in this conspiracy theory nonsense. Does it make you feel better about your country to believe such an absurdity about mine?
