Time for Paul & Gingrich to STEP ASIDE.....

LOL. Give it up dude. Even the Bush Administration abandoned trying to link al Qaeda to Iraq after all the evidence was discredited.

 

Your random personal attack, which has contributed absolutely nothing positive to your argument, but has in fact weakened it through an ad hominem logical fallacy, has been noted.

More baseless claims. Please provide a credible source to back up those points. If you're incapable of doing that, I will take that as an admission of your defeat.

I guess that's why you're throwing random personal attacks around effortlessly.
I guess that's why you're making baseless claims with zero supporting evidence.

Nope, no emotion or immaturity involved in either of those things. Just facts. LMAO!

Except for being the Godfather of the Tea Party, one of the two largest recent organized protest movements in America; as well as planting the seeds of a massive libertarian revolution that is taking place among my generation. You know, among other small potatoes.

Stop referring to adults younger than you as children. You're using it as if it somehow automatically elevates yourself and your arugument above me and my argument. Any mature adult can see through your tricks as they amount to nothing more than ad hominem.

Plan B is for Ron Paul to run as an Independent. Plan C is to write him in.

No Paul supporter is going to vote for Obama; you have been deceived by right-wing propaganda.

 

Give WHAT up, "dude"? I'm saying that virtually EVERYBODY was on board with going into Iraq. Further, I'm not trying to link al Qaeda to Iraq, so perhaps you should actually READ what I've written.

Are you not old enough to remember the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq?

 

Hahahaha - you can believe whatever Ron Paul TELLS you to believe, but his ideology is that of Isolationism. What's worse, is that he's a hypocrite, because he doesn't live what he preaches - as evidenced by his eagerness to head into Afghanistan.

Open your eyes, buddy! Your savior ain't much of a savior.

 

So, even though you're saying that his ideology isn't isolationist and ignoring that Ron Paul does not consider his ideology isolationist (which it isn't when you look at the definition of isolationism is), he is an isolationist? What the hell are you on?

 

But that isn't true. Most of the superpowers were against an invasion of Iraq. China, Russia, France, Canada, Chile, Germany, India, Brazil, The African Union. ALL opposed to the Iraq War. Where are you getting this revisionist BS?

 

His ideology is isolationist, but even he doesn't follow it. Ron Paul is both ignorant, and a hypocrite. But he does make one heckuva cult leader, doesn't he?

 

So, you don't accept his explanation of why he supported the initial invasion of Afghanistan so therefore he is a hypocrite? You're nuts.

 

Hahaha - a Ron Paul Zealot accusing somebody of revisionist BS. Now THAT is classic!

Read the UN Resolutions, and note the dates. I know you're not old enough to remember back that far, but surely you're old enough to read. Of course, you being a RP Zealot & all, I'm probably giving you too much credit...

 

The UN Resolutions dealing with what? If you're talking about UN Resolution 1441... are you? That Resolution didn't give any country the power to invade Iraq. Geesh, are you REALLY trying to argue that we don't know history when you constantly are making up ludicrous claims such as the majority of the UN supported the Iraq War?

 

A brokered convention could be very interesting.

 

Agreed. I'd kind of like to see how Jindal would do, doubt it'll happen though, I get the feeling Romney is going to buy his spot on the ballot.

 

Clint Eastwood for President.