Discussion in 'Coronavirus (COVID-19) News' started by FlamingLib, Feb 26, 2020.
Those 3 doctors were also on Fox News when the interview took place?
It was at the Press Conference the other day....it was covered by a number of stations.
Apparently you missed the Press Conference.....odd that you continue talk about this, when you missed that.
It's especially amusing to see Fake Don's claiming personal control of the economy (and taking credit for the unprecedented 10+ year expansion) exposed as invariably subject to a plethora of impactful, diverse factors.
Global Stock Sell-Off Intensifies Over Coronavirus Crisis
European and Asian indexes plunged on Friday. Wall Street was poised for another downbeat open.
Oh, well, he still has his bloated national debt, once the bête noire of conservatives, as yooj as his big, flabby tooshie!
"THEY CAN"T TAKE THAT AWAT FROM ME!"
Your are dead wrong in this instance. Extremely wrong. Go back to the first post I made in the discussion and stop spreading falsehoods.
Well... the way CDC gets funding is fear mongering. Regardless of the effects on the economy. There will be a corre tion in a couple of months when the virus dies.
you think the CDC did the corona virus to get public funding?
that is like saying hillary clinton hurt kobe bryant because the black vote is going to Trump
Providing a meaningless response is definitely not useful.
Just so you know - warmer temperatures do not kill the flu virus. They just also result in conditions (people being outside, more spread out, etc.) where the spread of the illness is less likely.
White flag noted
OK I did
Starting from OP post #1 until I replied!
Here is you very first post to this thread at post #52
And I quoted it and replied
Here is your second post and reply to this thread to me the one I replied to Post #175
I have checked it several times! You clearly didn't offer any data then what you see above at Post #52..
Every other post to me was one insult that I "Cant read" and then trolling from there on out to know.
Is it true Post #52 quotes The above members post and answers his last sentence?
Every argument you make is a falsehood by omission.
I will await your apology for your mischaracterizing my post.
LOL, hold your breath. Your are taking what Trump said out of context. It's just about "orange man bad" and it's getting old. The regular public is getting as tired of it as the right leaning voters.
Maybe so, but my comments were not. You asked what could he do differently and in that instance I responded but referring to the scientist.
That’s not a bad thing, it’s just good leadership.
Anyone having an issue with my comment is being disingenuous and only here to defend every perceived slight of the President.
Not every critical comment means the person hates him.
You gave an opinion. Your opinion is no more than an opinion. It's like an anus, everyone has one and yours isn't particularly special. He said the he didn't know. He never gave an answer that contained anything quantitative. He said that he didn't know. He gave several possibilities of both less and more.
You asked the question and I answered it. Plain and simple.
But here is an other opinion. He gets all kinds of crap because he asks for it. He is equally to blame. So he can quit crying.
No, he did not say that he did not know. He tried to pretend he was knowledgeable about a subject he knew nothing about and then just waffled nonsense
Exactly, and Agreed.
Trump's Presidency is becoming (even more) of a Clear and Present Danger.
In fact, this sums it up perfectly:
Clear & Present danger, sounds like talk to justify some illegal removal from office for the "good of the nation"
I do not like the guy, said so many times on here. But he is doing a good job as POTUS.
But ask yourself, if he is a imbecile yet he continues to best the Dems and the left in general....what does that make them?
BS. Just more "orange man bad" nonsense. Here is what he said:
“Well I don’t think it’s inevitable."
“It probably will. It possibly will. It could be at a very small level or it could be at a larger level.”
There isn't any waffle there. Waffling would be if he gave one opinion in one interview and then another opinion in another interview. He is saying that he doesn't' know. Sorry but the facts just don't fit your petty little scenario.
We're all probably being duped.
If residing in Bloomberg’s NY city, lower shades, close curtains and dim the lights to prevent surveillance cameras recording you in the act of violating several of the Local laws restricting consumption of food and drink the Mayor has decreed as unhealthy therefore illegal
Well... yes it does... and also creates conditions that make transmission all but impossible.
This is against rules and duly reported! I never told a lie of any kind. That’s offensive and uncalled for.
I notice that you can't rebut it however.
I absolutely did rebut you calling me a liar. You are out of line.
Separate names with a comma.