You never fail to live up to your name. So trying to change society from treating the races differently is treating the races differently? Is that a Catch-22? "Parity has existed for years in the broader sphere"? Where? I was referring to the US, so that statement is nonsense. How about Australia? India? Africa? You ignored my citation apparently....just go with your preconceptions. Tell me which goes with which. Nope, Hispanic born outside the country.
Those who came from the (Indian) Sub-continent down through the SE Asian landmass into Australia, were Dravidians. And I have no idea what the Aryan Invasion Myth is or means, and I'm not European.
Ye they came across the "middle east" from africa into india and were dravidian. Not caucusasian. The caucusasian myth is that the dravidian came from europe. This is eurocentric propoganda since it has been recently shown that dravidians were indigenous before the caucusasian invasion and moreso, the dravidian is part of the african expansion into asia. The dravidian would be what you would call afro/asian meaning they were basically africans since african is the dominant gene.
Indeed, we are talking about dravidians whom are an admixture of african and asian. Which incidenatally is not white which you claimed earlier. You are perpetuating the eurocentric myth of a european dravidian. Much like the eurocentric myth of a white jesus. Give yourself a cookie junior.
Where did I claim Dravidians were white? I defy you to provide evidence. And once again, I'm not European, have no idea what this Aryan BS is about, and I'm not white. Want to rethink your painfully narrow assumptions?
You are a white guy plus u said dravidian were caucus dwellers which means you promote caucus mountain origin of indians which in turn is a eurocentric doctrine. Dravidian is not caucus mountain dwellers. Dravidian is afro asian glad to explain.
England is an archaic term in EUROPEAN mapping, describing the inland and poorly explored region in West Africa as an area populated with "Negroes". This area comprised at least the western part of the region called Sudan---per Wikipedia. So it appears the Europeans invented "Negroland" just like they invented the word Negro. NIGER is a country in West Africa that is pronounced nai*jer. It is NOT pronounced in the same way as the racially charged word we are accustomed to hearing.
After you post something you can still edit it for about 15 min. That feature has saved me a lot of grief.
So you made that up. A patent falsehood. CAUCASIAN is a physical type. It's the term used to describe that type. It says nothing at all about colour. South Indians are very dark skinned, but they are Caucasians. Just want to take this opportunity to advise ALL POSTERS, that this individual has just race denied me. See my bold above. Joining illustrious company in the form of Segregation Joe. Any further doubts?
It appears so. Europeans have labelled ppl "black" since ancient greek times. Youre right that "african americans" didnt call themselves that. Seems to be a bit of a duel going on here
Youre confusing north and south. South are afro asian north are euro asian. The south are black. And not caucusasian, thats a white nationalist doctrine
If you want to stop racism you have to confront the very ppl who practice it, white folks exclusively and prove their lies wrong.
You do realize that the 'white folks exclusively' part of your post is racist in itself and goes against the point you are trying to make, right?
No, you are adding in irrelevant detail because your argument is a failure. And you're also race-denying.
No, you are adding in irrelevant detail because your argument is a failure. The word crank means pretending to be something youre not. And you're also race-denyiny
You honestly think that white people are the only racists anywhere in the world? You don't think you're letting some of your own racism show there? If you want to make a strong showing in this conversation, stop digging this particular hole.
