What do you think will happen if Obama is NOT 'elected' for the next four years?

They flip flop more than a fresh caught Walleye on a hot metal boat dock.

 

about time you saw Obama for what he was.

 

Yes, the liberal supply of excuses for their nonsensical "thinking" is endless. The "use" as you so naively put it, is to restore this nation to sanity. Regardless of party politics.

Such things as the Democrats have spent since the beginning of FY 2008, nearly $14 TRILLION DOLLARS. of that, $6.7 TRILLION is added debt. [THAT IS 44% of out total debt accumulated throughout our entire history, SINCE FY2008.

And WHAT did this spending insanity bring us? Full employment? No we have millions MORE unemployed that we did then. Did it bring us a robust economy? No the economy was near dead for 3 years while insane spending was in progress. Now its barely limping along.

Was the housing crisis solved? That hasn't even been touched. Housing today is every bit as bad as the day the bubble burst.

Has it helped our manufacturing or brought money into the nation instead of out of it? Not a dollar.

So we have CLEAR results of insane reckless spending and intrusion by the government. So what is the Democrat plan?????Spend MORE!!!

Increase taxes on the rich, BUT LEAVE ALL DEDUCTIONS AND LOOPHOLES IN PLACE! It won't increase revenue a dime. Is that sensible? Not hardly.

Lower corporate taxes,,,,,,,,,,,,but FINE corporations if they don't bring money back to the USA, TO BE TAXED! And of course AMERICAN Corporations would have to pay the "lower" corporate tax on profits made overseas where they already PAID corporate tax on those profits. Today they pay 0% US corporate taxes on overseas profits and obama wants to LOWER that to 28%. A mathematical genius this dolt!

Are Republicans a bright spot of hope? No, they are a dim spot of hope at best, but the Democrats are total darkness.

 

Nothing will happen or change.

 

If Obama isn't reelected African Americans will kill every single one of us. Better vote the way the Mastas tell us to.

 

The problem is, is that you have wackos running as Republicans ... been that way since ...

 

Bush looks like a Monkey. So does Obama. Obama looks like the Monkey King out of the Han classic Journey To The West. Obama's a fokking monkey. Let's go with it.

 

Yes Bush was about as bad as Nixon. But he was better than Carter, and much better than the incompetent, inexperienced, idiot obama.

 

None of you are making any sense ... how does bashing on Obama as the *Party of Hate & Death* make any of your wackadoo candidates electable ?

 

What makes you think I support any of the Republican candidates? Opposition to the Monkey People (leftists) doesn't make one a Republican necessarily.

 

"the *Party of Hate & Death*"

YOUR words, not mine. I've never used those words.

And who is "bashing" b.o.?

obama is inexperienced, unprepared, incompetent, ideologically rigid, egotistical, and irrational is not "bashing." That is simply describing the man as he is.

History will find him, BY A WIDE MARGIN, to have been the worst president in the history of the nation.

In 38 months in office he will have accumulated more debt than Bush did in 96 months in office. He is the only president in 235 years to have a deficit of $1 TRILLION DOLLARS ATTACHED TO HIS NAME. And by election time he will have his 4th deficit over a TRILLION dollars. No other president with even one. He has had 3 years to work on the economy, 2 of the 3 with a Democratically controlled Congress, BOTH House and Senate and we still have 1,292,000 fewer people with jobs than when he started. Reagan was PLUS 1.6 million jobs in the same time and under worse conditions.

He appointed a commission to find answers. HIS commission gave him their recommendations in Dec 2010. It was a rewrite of the successful Reagan plan. b.o. trashed it for pure ideological reasons. So we've gone over a year with a known successful plan that Congress, both D and R's said they would support. But it doesn't fit his illogical and totally brainwashed position.

Yes history will find obama nearly criminal in his ineptness.

 

... allow me to use an example ...





So again, ... why does the right-wing believe that as the *Party of Hate & Death* ... that this is a winning election platform ?

From my perspective ... its all ya got ...

 

What you may do with "Your example" is insert it wherever it makes you smile.

Here are the actual numbers from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet

1981 Reagan, total US employment, actual numbers, NOT seasonally adjusted
01/1981, 89,831,000
01/1984, 91,357,000=PLUS 1,526,000
01/1985, 95,029,000=PLUS 3,672,000, MORE!

Bush
01/2001, 130,433,000
01/2009, 131,555,000=PLUS 1,122,000 Not good but Ive never said bush was good. I've got Bush tied with Nixon for the 3rd worst president ever.

obama
01/2009, 131,555,000
01/2011, 130,263,000= MINUS 1,292,000.

 

Kind of makes you wonder why this thing called the 2012 GOP / Tea Bag Prez hopefuls doesn't make this the Big Time campaign election platform ...

Maybe tomorrow ... right now they're trying to figure-out why womens' wombs are the cause of U.S. economic and moral decline ...

 

I think the Republicans are like the Democrats lite. Republicans collaborate with Democrats.

I don't think the prospects are very good for your generation of Americans generally. No president is going to be able to change your fate.

The struggle between left and right is over the power of govt. vs. individual liberty. The struggle can be characterized in many different ways, but that is the simplest way to put it.

That being said, it is important to wage the struggle to prevent the imposition of the left wing agenda through the expansion of govt. That's why we fight.

 

Catchy comeback,,,,,,,,,,seek help!

 

It depends on who is elected rather than Obama. If it's Romney, not much will change. If it's Santorum, the country is in for a rough time.

 

If it is "anybody but obama," the country is better off. Replacing the worst president in history with anyone else is worth the effort.

 

Obama is hardly the "worst president in history." He's pretty thoroughly in the middle of the pack, probably slightly better than average. He's not a great president, but he's better than his credible opponents would be.

 

Like Grover Cleveland he will make a comeback and be elected for his second term in 2016.

 

You're evidently unaware of everything about his record on the economy, spending, unemployment, housing, regulations, Socialism, and rigidity.

And of course, his incompetence. That is what has made him the worst president in history. His own lack of any positive abilities save speech giving.

 

How is the economy the president's responsibility? He's got very little power over the economy.

Nor does he control the government's purse strings.

I think that conservatives would viciously attack him were he to use the only tool he has available for countering unemployment--directly hiring workers for government projects.

I guess you think he ought to ruin the economy by spending more government money to directly hire some unemployed people to build houses? Because otherwise I'm not entirely sure how any of this is "his record", or even remotely related to his performance in the position.

He doesn't establish them; while it is true that he has been selective in enforcing certain regulations, I really don't think your complaint here is that he hasn't been enforcing enough regulations.

Obama is not a socialist, nor has he pursued any remotely socialist goals. He's about as far from socialist as you can get. He's a very ardent state capitalist.

How so? A bigger failing of his is his lack of a spine and his complete willingness to bend to minor pressure from the right.

 

It does't matter who is elected, unless if by some miracle beyond comprehension occurs, and Ron Paul is elected. Even then the difference wouldn't be that great, because the establishment would still control the rest of government. After that, any other Republican candidate will govern significantly differently only on largely irrelevant social issues!!

 

LIBERALISM, the party and the president of the EXCUSE. They have an excuse for every failing they've made. They think a good excuse, is as good as a positive policy. obama is an EXCUSE as a president and there is no such thing as a good excuse.

 

Ha! Does it matter? They are all two sides of the same coin. They are owned by the 1%. one deception after another. When will you people learn? This is exactly what they want. While your time is consumed with petty bickering over their smoke screens, they continue business as usual and cater to their owners concerns. Working to create a modern slave society where the 1% can continue to scrape even more into their grubby greedy pockets. Its to late for votes to change anything, they own the entire political system. Nothing short of a full revolution will change things. Yes I do mean blood in the streets. Politicians and their owners all have to go, than we can start anew.