What To Do About The Long-Term Implications of Automation

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Meta777, Oct 22, 2017.

  1. Meta777

    Meta777 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    15,637
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Noncooperation??
    But didn't you just agree with me that folks should be remembering to go out and vote?

    ...At any rate, I'll be the first to admit that our current system for electing representatives is severely flawed.
    Among other things, it contributes to increasing levels of polarization, as opposed to encouraging us to come together,
    and it does not always lead to results which accurately reflect the desires of the people.
    I'm going to make a separate thread about it sometime latter on, but having said all that,
    as bad as our election system may be, it is not completely useless or irredeemable in its current state,
    and as such I do not believe that refusing to participate in elections is in any way helpful.

    Gatherings in the streets and raising voices though......doing that would at least elevate this issue which we currently do not discuss nearly enough. I was surprised and pleased when Obama brought it up a while ago...but then after that one time, I never heard him mention it again. Then Jill Stein made some off-handed remark about it after she lost the election...and I wondered to myself, why weren't you running on this issue during the campaign, and why again haven't you said anything about it since that one time. And then after that, I wondered to myself, where are all the other politicians on this issue? Do they even realize that its a problem? Do they care? If we leave something like this to only a few people who keep treating it like an after thought, its never going to get fixed....at least not until...as you said, things get bad enough. But of course by then, the damage will have been done. I don't know about you, but I am not content to simply wait for that to happen, especially not when there are things we can do now.

    -Meta
     
  2. Meta777

    Meta777 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    15,637
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And they shouldn't have to want them...for work that is. People should be able to sustain themselves regardless of whether or not someone else in society needs them. Because it is not the purpose of people to work for a society (especially one that has no need of them), rather, the purpose of society is to work for the people. Somewhere along the line we seem to have gotten that backwards...

    Anyways...as I mentioned in the Four-Phased approach, as long as people still have basic needs which are not being met, the best thing to do is probably to simply have government put money into building, sustaining, and maintaining the broader infrastructures related to meeting them.

    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...cations-of-automation.517121/#post-1068163031
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...cations-of-automation.517121/#post-1068163094

    -Meta
     
  3. Meta777

    Meta777 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    15,637
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I think there are plenty of other good ways to keep people out of trouble.
    I just don't think it makes sense to pay people not to work, when there are folks who aren't able to get their basic needs met.
    But, if needs are being met....perhaps we can start paying people to keep others out of trouble............

    -Meta
     
  4. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We do that now and its a diaster

    Millions of able bodied Americans on welfare doing nothing while ill3gal aliens sneak into the country to do the work

    To me that makes no sense
     
  5. Meta777

    Meta777 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    15,637
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Paying people to keep others out of trouble is a disaster?
    Or are you saying that we're paying people to not work, and that's a disaster.
    I think we are in agreement on the latter. What is your opinion on replacing such idle welfare with a WPA 2.0-like program?

    -Meta
     
  6. Bear513

    Bear513 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    7,576
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    Trophy Points:
    113

    So you want basic cars like a Ford escort to cost $200,000 each? Cell phones $10 grand same with computers? A big Mac $59 bucks?


    .
     
  7. Meta777

    Meta777 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    15,637
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not that I agree with the poster you were quoting.....but lol! Where did you pull those numbers from?
     
  8. Bear513

    Bear513 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    7,576
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What would you think everything would cost with out automation and robotics? ( i just made up those numbers) and heck we would need every illegal we could get, we would have to kidnap them ...

    Btw, I have been in manufacturing for over 30 years.


    Edit: my first computer was $6,000, my first CD player $400, my first VCR $600
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2017
  9. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    26,524
    Likes Received:
    7,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good idea!! Fund a WPA-type program to build and update infrastructure, to convert everything we can to alternative power, build high-speed rail, etc. and watch the recover take off. Studies show that for each dollar spent on unemployment, $1.60 of value is created due to spending of that dollar. How much better would such a WPA program be? Plenty better no doubt.

    But when it's done, then what?

    We will have to phase-in a cut in work hours while paying the same wage.
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2017
    Meta777 likes this.
  10. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    59,910
    Likes Received:
    16,454
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We've watched automation grow ever since some guy used an ox to help plow a field.

    There just isn't any place to stop this. Nor should we want to.
     
  11. Fenton Lum

    Fenton Lum Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2017
    Messages:
    6,127
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There it is, right there.
     
  12. Meta777

    Meta777 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    15,637
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For sure, if we were to get rid of automation, things would cost more, and we'd need more workers to produce the same amount that we produce today...assuming that level of production would even be possible at all. Again, I don't think that getting rid of or preventing automation is the right way to go. Still, if we are going to keep the automation, we need to have some way to make sure that folks are still able to maintain some reasonable standard of living. I posted my suggestion in the third post of this thread. But what do you think we should do?

    -Meta
     
  13. Fenton Lum

    Fenton Lum Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2017
    Messages:
    6,127
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, and anyway, can't stop it, it's a train, we're on the tracks, and it's not all bad, ... at all. The issue is this economic system will not work as this techno world evolves, it's from an economic era to be left behind like feudalism, and for pretty much the same reasons. If there are no adjustments in the economic system it will be feudalism, for some it already is. It's a closed biological system we exist in, unless you're going to be on Newt's moon colony. Nothing expands to infinity but entropy, and this economic system is predicated upon growth to infinity.
     
    Meta777 likes this.
  14. Meta777

    Meta777 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    15,637
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its good to know I'm not the only one who thinks that's a good idea. :)
    And of course, the last time we tried something like that, it worked so well
    that the only reason we ended up ending it, was basically because it was working too well
    at keeping people employed at a time where we as a country needed every hand we could muster to go towards a war effort.

    But you bring up a good point, any new program would undoubtedly be even better than the last,
    as, having tried it before and experienced the results, we now have the luxury of learning from what worked well in the past and improving upon it, cutting out the less effective parts and expanding upon the good parts.

    Exactly!

    And that is actually Phase 2 of the plan I posted in the third post (re-posted below).

    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...cations-of-automation.517121/#post-1068163094

    Phase 1: As automation begins to displace workers: Government should do more to provide for basic needs, by hiring a portion of the displaced to improve the country's various infrastructures (as it relates to food, water, housing, transportation, communication, power, etc.) in areas where the private sector falls short, as well as hiring folks to produce affordable personal automation (and or the resources to run it) at such a time that such automation becomes singularly sufficient to handle the roles of the aforementioned infrastructures. Costs for all this should be offset, in part by user/purchase-fees, and in part by increased taxes on the most wealthy.

    Phase 2: As everyone's basic needs are met: The standard workweek should be reduced where possible, spreading out existing work across an increased # of people, and freeing up time for those who were already employed. Employees should also be afforded more paid vacation, more medical/paternity leave time, etc. etc. Costs here will be offset by an automation-induced increase in productivity.

    Phase 3: As people come to have more time on their hands: Government should begin investing more into education, research (cures for diseases, space exploration, additional automation etc.), and training, as well as hiring people to provide for recreational needs, by creating, operating, and maintaining a larger number of parks, community centers, tennis courts, swimming pools, equipment depots, sports orgs., etc. etc. and even branching out into art and music commissions.

    Phase 4: Once everything is fully automated: Government simply needs to ensure that the perpetual benefits yielded from the marriage of automation with the natural resources continues to reach everyone. In such a scenario, work itself might become a luxury of recreational nature. It might even be the case that some begin to pay others for the opportunity to work, not because they needed to, or as an intermediate step to get something they wanted, but because work itself was what they wanted. This, in my opinion, is where we want to reach.


    In summary,...
    -hire people to provide for basic needs by supporting our society's infrastructures/any automation which takes the role of that infrastructure
    -hire people to free up time for others/changing labor laws to do the same after basic needs are met
    -hire people to provide for recreational needs, and to promote education and research, and
    -continue to do all of the above as needed (if needed) once 100% automation has been achieved.


    ....so yeah. I guess great minds think alike. :)

    -Meta
     
    Kode and thinkitout like this.
  15. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    59,910
    Likes Received:
    16,454
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We need your phase 3 today.

    We're seeing the result of having too many unprepared for the rate of change as it is.

    In fact, it was a serious issue during the last presidential campaign.

    Let's remember that manufacturing production was fully recovered within a couple years of the 2008 crash. Yet, manufacturing employment has not yet recovered.
     
    Meta777 likes this.
  16. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Having had the opportunity to do some traveling since we last discussed this topic I have encountered something that I believe might throw some light on the subject.

    It is worth noting that there have been "brain drains" in the past for a variety of reasons and they usually because of better opportunities in other regions for those with skills that can no longer find the appropriate skilled work in the region where they are. America has been a beneficiary of these in that it has had a "brain gain" from what happened prior to WW2 in Europe as an example.

    Up until this point we have been primarily focused on job losses among jobs that can be easily automated but what happened with the internet was that it became possible to outsource white collar jobs. Accounting, programming, medical record keeping and the like were jobs that could be done by equally skilled people for lower wages in other nations. This meant that there are fewer of these jobs available here in the USA and so some people are actively looking overseas for jobs now.

    https://www.inc.com/paul-grossinger/will-we-see-a-devastating-brain-drain-hit-the-us.html

    https://venturebeat.com/2017/02/24/the-trump-effect-the-u-s-is-heading-for-a-tech-brain-drain/

    In essence someone with skills in technology could leave America and find a job that provides a better living standard than they have here without the same likelihood of being laid off.

    In my travels I encountered young people in Africa who were traveling to Europe to find work and gain experience before returning to take higher level positions. Articles that I have read indicate that this is happening in India and probably other nations too.

    What does the above have to do with the long term implications of automation here in America? I suspect that we are already experiencing it in the form of an exodus of technology expertise. Those who can are taking opportunities elsewhere in the world. That is not a good prognosis for innovation here although I suspect that this nation is quite resilient and will adapt in the long term. For Americans lower on the skill set ladder the cost of living here in the USA might be such that it becomes more affordable for them to live in other places that are less expensive.

    We are about to live through some interesting times and I believe that there could well be a shift in focus from having a rising standard of living to just being able to maintain an existing standard of living. The signs are there that Millennials are not interested in purchasing cars and houses in the same way that their parents did. That makes them far more flexible when it comes to being able to move elsewhere if the need to find work arises and the opportunity is outside of our borders. With the internet the ability to remain in touch with friends and family is no longer a barrier to emigration.

    As America automates some Americans will disperse to other parts of the world IMO. Just thought that you might be interested in this perspective.
     
    Meta777 likes this.
  17. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    faith that god will solve for automation, the earthly solutions are sinful

    you must labor an honest days work for an honest days pay, which means living wages for menial work.

    welfare is the sin of laziness, and education is the sin of debt by jews. middle ground could be reached by free education, but paying too many taxes to ceasar is a sin too.

    this divine solution may be rational as progress in society is open to interpretation, and robots would be more of a luxury than a necessity for civilians. military robots are the essential uses.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2017
  18. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    i respectfully disagree, free market capitalism can solve for everything.

    when robots create supply, humans will create demand for other things. for example hollywood cannot be replaced by robots in the near future.

    the technology required for robots to show emotions and be life like is still generations away. when that day comes generous welfare will be redistributed to the peasants so everyone can afford to experience consensual robotic relations.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2017
  19. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’m saying that able bodied adults on welfare should be working and providing for themselves instead

    We do not need a new WPA.

    There are plenty of jobs in the private sector being filled by illeal aliens that American could and should be doing

    Enforce our immigration laws by deporting illegal aliens while at the same time remove people from welfare who should be working
     
  20. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think your ideas make sense. We are however going to see the basic conflict between what works for the population as a whole and unbridled capitalism become more and more intense.
     
    Kode likes this.
  21. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    . Look at the increasing prevalence of animated films. We are almost at the point where there is no need for real actors. In five years you will be unable to tell the difference between real and animated humans. You aleady can't with animals and babies.

    Just as an exercise try to actually come up with a profession that cannot be automated. About the only ones I can think of are plumbers and electricians and others who do home repairs.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2017
    Meta777 likes this.
  22. One Mind

    One Mind Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Messages:
    20,296
    Likes Received:
    7,744
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, we turn into a nation of actors? Doubtful.

    When we moved from agriculture to industry and mass consumption, we knew where agri workers were going. We have no clue where the masses of service sector and factory workers are going. We can only wait with hope that some new sector will be created that AI and robots cannot do. Yet we have no idea what that will be. So we say, oh, the free market will solve even this problem. I do not believe it.
     
    Meta777 likes this.
  23. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    26,524
    Likes Received:
    7,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The only remaining problem, and it is a major one and reflected in Willreadmore's post, begins with Phase 2. The problem is that whereas you have laid it all out very well for the benefit of the people and society, there is absolutely no way in hell that the powerful who currently hold the reins of power and wealth will allow it. They will channel the whole situation to serve their greed for wealth and power. Work hours will not be reduced while paying the same weekly and annual wage. Rather, they will create unemployment and will take all the gains they can for themselves. All things will be brought into the service of wealth accumulation. We will continue to see the economy slide toward world domination, one world government, and monopoly because capitalism must grow to survive.

    To bring any of this very logical plan into effect, we will have to have a new economic system not based on private ownership for private profit. That will prove to be the first priority.
     
  24. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    26,524
    Likes Received:
    7,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You haven't yet come to terms with our history of an economy that was much, much closer to "free market capitalism" in the early 1900s and the inhumane working and living conditions thrust upon the people by the Robber Barons. It was so bad that there were two socialist parties and a communist party threatening violent revolution, and that threat produced an "FDR" and his New Deal to appease the people and save capitalism.
     
  25. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    26,524
    Likes Received:
    7,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What percentage of the population do they represent?
     

Share This Page