What Went Wrong For The DNC? Easy....

Denial is not just a river in Egypt!

 

Onus is entirely on you to prove your fallacious allegation with credible substantiation.

 

All in good time - all in good time!

 

Just follow the US Constitution and you'll be alright....that's the document as it was originally intended---not imagined.

 

So you can't substantiate your utter nonsense?

Got it!

Have a nice day!

 

Trump is getting his cabinet in order http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/who-is-in-president-trump-cabinet-231071.

Ivana is measuring the White House drapes.

 

So you're telling me what and how the political right thinks?

 

I'm telling you, if the Democrats were humble, if Clinton didn't think she needed to be so secretive and aloof, if they didn't hold the belief that they were entitled to the Presidency, they would have won. Just look at the Dem threads decrying "Madame President". and "trump will lose in a landslide". You are elitists, you think you have a right to rule and not to govern. From the time Obama took power and bluntly replied "elections have consequences" and that "I'm the President".

Once you were civil libertarians. That is when you rose to power.

You are now bootstrapping goosestepping brown coat authoritarians.

Lastly, this is the boomer rang effect of Bill Clinton. He got a blowjob in the Whitehouse and Democrats brushed it off- some even played it as "I wish I were him and get get a blowjob in the Whitehouse" and you encouraged it. So then you try to stick Trump with this misogyny accusation? That was a really, really stupid move because those working stiffs that you got to praise Clinton for his blowjob are probably now praising Trump for his "locker room comments".

In other words, your "win at any cost mentality" turned on you and destroyed your candidate.

Reap what you sow, mother(*)(*)(*)(*)ers.

 

You understood it just fine. Perhaps more ranting from you.

 

Wrong. He listened to the WOMAN who he hired to make sure the campaign went as planned. You think she had nothing to do with it? I stress SHE, again. He had a WOMAN help win him the WH. But he hates women right? 😜


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Bull. Trump will be the most right wing President in our history, as his corporate masters dictate. If you are successful expect to be imprisoned, either because Muslims, Hispanics or some other minority suddenly turns up in your ancestry or you will be smeared by a relentless campaign of baseless slander, just like Hillary was.

 

Thats why you need to stop denying fact

- - - Updated - - -

Ok maybe you could support such idiotic claims with some fact.

Specifically what baseless slander do you mean?

 

He has no corporate masters....well except for those businesses with "Trump" in the name.

 

We don't want to learn your style of governance, you can see the results. We rejected it. And you barely won the popular vote by a few thousand.

 

No, how did you get that? Are you telling me what and how the political right thinks? If so that's incredibly arrogant and likely fraught with inaccuracy!

What I said was
Obama didn't do a good job of pushing his agenda, thus there was no "socialist policies" to rally against.

I argued that since Trump didn't seem to meaningfully address "traditional values" he doesn't give a fig about "traditional values" a term that is so generalized here as to be meaningless- (I assumed you meant marriage equality and where people pee?)

Regarding "new traditional values" meaning here "we don't care who you bang and where you pee" I think its safe to say that Obama is well aligned for this new outlook, as will be his successor.

Thus the reasons you cite are not likely reasons why those who voted for him did so.
Or if it is they were responding to signals that Trump didn't put forth, mindlessly stamping (R) and hoping for the best, an assumption you're seemingly willing to make, but I am not.

Or I missed something? Could you cite some of Trumps policy perhaps that expands upon your notions of "traditional values" or anti socialism?

 

The GOP can't say anything about "style of government" until they have one.

And, as it stands we literally have NO idea what Trump is likely to do on most of the serious issues we face today. And, we certainly don't know how he is going to go about his job.

What we have as of today is a president proven to be racist and sexist (way more than half America) and who has absolutely zero experience in government of any kind.

Until you catch a clue, you need to avoid the whole concept of what this election means in terms of governance.

 

I'm curious - what more would he have to do in order for you to recognize that he is part of the "corporate masters"?

 

Congratulations to ' the Donald '.


I'm not being sarcastic, either.

I haven't been this proud of our American system since I voted for Paul Tsongas.

 

How low would the Dow futures had to have dropped last night for you to see he is not a Wall Street pawn?

 

Corporations losing confidence in the future is your idea of a rosy economic picture of full employment???

The markets are an indication of what employers are thinking.

And, what they are thinking is that this is a disaster.

 

Your own beliefs. In reality, Donald has stated positions on crucial issues and he will probably act on others as they come along. Furthermore, it is this new Congress that will take on the part of legislative work. This new union of Nationalists and Conservatives, will show you what a true government is. We won't be slugging along economically, that I can promise you.

 

Yes.

On a day to day basis, that is almost NEVER a factor in stock prices.

Clearly that must be true since the Dow finished the day up over 250 points

 

I love that "don't worry, my president won't be able to do what he says he wants to do" approach!! But, it IS true. Those voting for Trump can not possibly believe his divisive hateful rhetoric, and one can only hope that there will be effective checks against whatever it is he chooses to do.

As for his policy, it's ridiculous to think you know what he will do. His policy is ridiculous and he's changed his direction almost immediately every time he comes out with a new direction.

And, Wall Street is an indicator of whether employers think Trump is going to do something positive. They are the ones who put MONEY on their evaluation of the future - and they say you're just wrong.

"Probably act on others as they come along"??? THAT is the "policy" you voted for?

 

I didn't vote. Though I guess you can consider that a vote for Donald Trump. A vote in Name Only . For eight years, Liberals have made the Middle East worst, were about to agree with Europeans on a Russian Front and have denigrated a significant portion of this electorate. A portion that had enough with being called angry, or racist, or any of the above. If Liberals truly governed as they said they would, it's a different story.

But yes, I voted on a non-knee jerk policy, rather than continuing the failed policies of the past. I voted on inclusion instead of hatred. Though you will never recognize it's your side. After all, it's okay to hate your undesirables lol. Donald Trump never called out Hillary's supporters, just the woman herself. Trump has always had more class than Hillary even with his missteps.

And now, the man of the hour has won the presidency of the United States. He's done so in remarkable fashion and he is the new leader of the free world. Though it will take them and you, some time to process greatness when it happens.

 

IMO Trump didn't have the organization to do that, and the Republican party lacked the motivation to do so. This was a real upset.