When I see a tattoo on a pretty girl...

I think #2 is a member of an unknown pagan group and of a yet unknown gender identity.

 

Whatever it is, it needs some serious lessons on how to apply makeup! A new hair style might not hurt either.

 

I think a flamethrower is the only thing that will help.

 

I guess, but that should be over soon--when middle-aged soccer moms are getting tatts, they are no longer a symbol of rebellion.

 

I hate em. The girls are nuts ruining their bods. They destroy their beauty they are not improving it. Some look like they got a skin disease the tats are so ugly.

see end of post for tattoo rundown starting with 'beat girls'...

nsfw

https://danielteolijr.wordpress.com...america-will-look-like-100-years-after-frank/

 

That's what bothers me now about tattoos (I'm getting used to them)--the lack of cohesion between one tattoo and the next. For most, it's like a bad playlist. Individually, the tattoos may not look bad--but the combination of different styles, etc. clashes.

That said, I wish I had some mad money to use for investing in tattoo removal machine manufacturers.....

 

I saw a girl once who had tattoos all over both of her legs. She was probably 19 at most. It looked awful, IMO.

 

Depends on the tattoos obviously, but in general I think they are great on females.

 

Digital tattoos would be much better. Looking at the same old stamp gets tiresome eventually.

 

Beauty can be sublime. Tattoos? Not so much.

 

That refers to a particular type of tattoo positioned on or just above the base of the spine. At the risk of being crude they were said to provide something for the guy to look at whilst... well... you know.

 

A really good tattoo can catch your eye - for a while. A bad one will really catch your eye and hold it.

 

LGTB-Q-XYZ&? Just a guess.

 

I think women are beautiful just how they are. It turns me off to see their bodies all marked up with ink.

My two cents ...

 

Best excuse I have ever seen. If I owned a tattoo parlor I would have your post on the front window.

 

I imagine she would be your ideal woman:



She's be almost perfectly camouflaged except for her hair.

 

When did Phyllis Diller get tats?

 

Nope. No tattoos for me. I couldn't care less what anyone else thinks. It's what I think that matters, and I don't like them. Besides, I've heard that it's painful sometimes and they are expensive too. I can't think of a bigger waste of my time and money.

 

They are not planning out their entire look, are they. One would put more thought into choosing a bedspread.

 

I think I saw someone wearing leggings and tight arm sleeves that look like tattoos. How about a 'second skin' with programmable images? It would look like tattoos but, instead being embedded into the skin, you could just peel it off.

I figure permanancy is part of the equation in getting a tatt. However, with this, one could actually vitrually 'try on' the tatt they think they want to have embedded forever into their skin. I know, I know....Someone's already done it.

 

And this thread is why feminism is mainstream.

- - - Updated - - -

I don't think women live to please you bro. Knock it off.

 

If this gets me banned, so be it. This is a disgusting thread where disgusting, old, perverted, gross looking men talk about what they don't like in women who would never look twice at their old smelly and disgusting selves.

 

My opinion, bro. Don't read 'em if you don't like 'em.

 

Not really,
Brad Pitt did like Angelina Jolie before.