WHITE GUN OWNERS, THE LEFT HATES YOU-Law-Abiding, White Gun Owners Are The New Nazis

They don't care at this point, since all of them have to be registered. You did register right?

If they want it, they know what door to kick in to get it.

 

In order to have a featured rifle with a std mag release, it must have been registered as such back in the 90’s. The only legal way to remove a bullet button now is to go featureless.

 

Right. We should use that money to spend another TRILLION dollars in the ME, or another TRILLION dollars on the f-35 and Littoral Class warship, neither of which even effing work.

Funny, what you conservatives choose to waste my tax dollars on. Literally ANYTHING except poor Americans.

 

The door closes June 1st.

 

Uh, our biggest expense is "poor Americans" and "poor non-US citizens living here illegally".

The defense budget pales against medicare, unemployment, and social security.

 

This is incorrect. Let's say I had a featured rifle in the 90's and in order to comply in the 00's I installed a BB. Along comes 2016 and that rifle is categorized as an assault weapon wit, or without the BB. I can now remove it without legal consequence.

 

So that's a no then?

 

A couple of trillion here, a couple of trillion there. Who's counting, right?

 

CA lost the bullet-button court case, so just went ahead and classified all semi auto mag fed rifles as "assault weapons".

Funny stuff.

 

So you admit that the vast majority of our budget has been going to the "poor" for decades.

Still poor though. Strange.

 

So you don't think you should observe the laws you tell us we should support.

 

I think I have until June 1st. As of today, I'm still legal.

 

Well, being the law abiding supporter of "common sense" gun laws, I thought you'd be one of the first in line to show how law abiding you are.

Why wait?

 

Oh, Look, there's those pesky "entitlements" again. Where's Paul Ryan when we need him?

 

Because I have until June 1st. Haven't I made that clear?

 

Oh you made it clear. Just curious why you'd wait almost 5 months to show much you support these life saving measures being implemented.

 

No one's entitled to anything except opportunity.

At some point it will become unsustainable, and then the fun begins.

 

~~~~
That is why America is so great. You Can Choose.

 

People are "entitled" to benefit from social programs into which they have contributed.

Oh, please, I've made it clear that I am no Prius driving tree hugger. I am a Democrat, but I disagree with a number of Democrat policies. Inane California gun laws being one of them.

 

Yes, except many of those "entitled" to SSA benefits have never paid a dime into the program.

Remember that you supported them when they do come to get your guns in CA.

 

I stand by my decisions.

 

You think owning instruments to easily murder people is "freedom"? Guns ONLY DESTROY. That's all they do. Nothing else. They are instruments of destruction. They can't get you from point A to point B. They don't alleviate a headache. They don't grow flowers. They destroy things. That's all. Why is that concept so hard to grasp?

"Stop"? Reducing the number of mass murdered is a victory just like traffic lights at intersections. Most people stop when it turns red and prevent a crash. A few do not and smash into other citizens, maiming and killing them. Just think what it would be like without traffic lights.

But the problem is guns ... in the hands of Americans. You wouldn't give matches to a child, would you?

So why are you not allowed to own bazookas? Isn't the problem still there despite banning them?

 

And yet, EVERY SINGLE assault-type weapons ban has withstood SCOTUS scrutiny. In fact, SCOTUS has yet to even touch assault weapons bans.

What conclusions can we draw from that?

 

If the united state supreme court has chosen to not hear such a case yet, then the prohibitions in question have not actually withstood scrutiny. Therefore the claim being presented by yourself is factually incorrect. This is especially true when one of the lower rulings proclaimed the prohibition was justified on the basis of the public believing it was safer as a result, even if it is truly not.

The only conclusion that can be drawn, is that countless individuals in the united states are hopelessly ignorant of what denial or certiorari actually amounts to. The united state supreme court has stated in absolute terms, that their decision to not hear a particular case does not amount to them agreeing with the holdings of the lower courts.