So you're saying that because I said something somewhere that hurt your feelings, it's OK for you to throw the first swings in any particular conversation with me. You just moved the goal posts to exonerate yourself. LOL... Personal grudges that you drag in from elsewhere (your entire argument that I am "racist" comes from my not conforming to your untenable conclusions about IQ equality) are what motivated you to be uncivil on that thread in spite of that I was not uncivil to you on that thread until on that thread you fired the first shot. You wished me dead and dragged a black woman through the mud with misogynistic remarks (that you used against me as well) by calling us "whores." So you can call others a whore which is an attack on their gender, but if you get a whiff of a racial slur in return, then you're the victim. Yes, you said that. Let's look at your motive for that: I held your feet to the fire here regarding your poor sources for IQ equality, and you went off on a rage and went to another forum to post your personal beef with me. LMAO... Dropping your argument and going off on personal attacks isn't "intimidating" of anyone. It means you have no argument and are trying to rebound elsewhere. My God, you must think I'm as dumb as you are. I went through that thread and she did no such thing. Your disagreement was ideological with her and once you learned her race, you went off into personal attacks calling her a whore and worse. You did. Her crime was being black and sharing the opinions she did. And right after that you started on me because you transferred your rage toward her in my direction. And you assume the use of the word "thug" regarding your beating someone was a racial reference. Are you channeling Richard Sherman? Get this: Attacking someone because they called you a name is thuggish behavior. It's also extremely childish and shows you lack the ability to control your hostile impulses. By your own story, you didn't beat someone up because they threatened to shoot up the school because the kid was suspended by your own account. You kicked someone ELSE in the face (which can cause serious injury or death) because he allegedly threw racial slurs at you. Can't you keep your own story straight? You have an interesting penchant for changing the narrative of a situation to make yourself look really good. I have it in good faith you haven't done this on purpose. Oh and somehow your reference to this white kid as a "hick" isn't a racial insult. What you did was hear the "N word" and threatened to physically attack someone for using it, following through on that threat. Stop pretending otherwise. You deserved the month suspension. Indeed, you deserved a stint in kid prison for it. You did not kick someone in the face to stop an act of terror; you did it because he said a word that hurt your feelings and like you do online, you completely lose control of yourself and go insane. All you're doing is trying to justify YOUR starting the uncivil words with me on that thread by dragging in vague references to previous emotional hurts and then presenting things done AFTER you were attacking me and my gender, posting XXX porn, etc. Had you not done those things, I'd have not lifted a solitary finger. You have your chronology all mixed up. Let's repeat: The thread was civil until YOU started it against first Rita and then myself, for reasons of ideology. You said this before having failed 2 years ago to defend your use of him as a source while you've continually used him since on multiple threads on multiple forums, as if you were trying to pull the wool over the eyes of your opponents. You can claim the moon is made of cheese to those who question it, using a source that has earned bad reputation from his peers. All you're doing is making an ass of yourself and are wasting your energy because you aren't proving a single thing, regardless of how emotionally invested you are in that the moon is cheddar. You promised 2 years ago to read his dumb book and defend it and keep foot dragging. I'm not stupid. You're obviously NEVER going to defend his work which is why these threads turn ugly. They turn ugly precisely when I show up, question your use of Nisbett, and you can't answer. That's the trigger for every one of these meltdowns. Because I don't respond to deflection you whip up hoping to save face and to deflect from your continued use of a bad source that you cannot defend. You must think I'm stupid. In other words, you're doubling down on the idea that race doesn't exist but by the way you're going to use what you call junk science - cranial morphology - to prove they were black. If race doesn't exist, then don't claim any ancient civilization was of any given race. That's what consistency would look like. They were just human, remember? Bullying? All they did was not let the blacks move into the cities they built, leaving the blacks to their own devices in the bush as they had lived before whites got there. How is mass immigration not a form of colonialism? Except for that which comes from you. If I lost my mind every time over the duration of my life that I have had a black or Latino throw a racial slur at me, I'd have murdered hundreds by now. Oddly, I can control myself and have the intelligence to know when a moron is trying to bait me with slurs. Not everyone has that ability, clearly. So in other words that the masses of people in Europe don't want these illegals swarming over their borders is a form of invasion, so you're on the side of the Europeans in removing them? I don't claim Europe for whites. Nature did that. You just don't like white people telling you no, anywhere. Ever. For any reason. We are not obligated to take you in any more than you're obligated to take us in. And if you want to browbeat people with historical grievance, keep in mind Africans invaded Europe first and took slaves from Europe first. And no, they didn't ask permission.