Because some on the board still deny it..........

HUH?

 

You wish.

 

Russian influence, Muslim influence, Korean influence, Actors influence or Martian influence makes no difference to me as I wasn't going to vote for Hillary anyway.

 

You should try a new hairdo.

 

Since the polls did not accurately predict the outcome of the election, how can they be in any way relevant in determining whether Russian interference affected the outcome???

Your argument makes no sense. . . . The polls proved nothing except that the margin of error went beyond expectations.

 

I was voting Clinton until Russia bought me a ferrari. Awesome. vroom!

 

Amazing... the denial of Trumpers

 

Putin hates Hillary. That was his target. Sure they helped Bernie, why not. He didn't have a snowball's chance in a blast furnace and it would hurt Hillary. Did Putin want Trump to win? Oh, I guess if he must, at least he's manageable. Meanwhile, what a great opportunity to throw a bucket of rusty nails into America's election process and show the world democracy doesn't work.

 

Yet, no collusion.

Oh! And let me know how many Trump votes were because of Russian ads.

 

Yes, fake.

 

Oh you guys, the idea that PROPAGANDA is something NEW in politics speaks volumes about todays leftist Learn history and the rule of Propaganda, it was created for the gullible centuries ago and has only gotten more useful in todays hyper-gullible numbskulls!

 

I see the logic center ran dry

 

if the Russian lawyer actually had good info against Hillary, no doubt Team Trump would have promised sanctions relief.

and that would have been illegal collussion.

 

I can't keep track:

Was it the Russians who helped Donald Trump win?
Was it the Zionists?
Was it the neoCons?
Was it the alternate right?

Or

Was it because her highness Hillary Rodham Clinton couldn't be troubled to campaign in Wisconsin and two other Midwest states.........

 

If Drumpf had not paid off Stormy Daniels weeks before the election how many votes do you think it would have changed when a porn star revealed she had an affair with the Adulterer-in-Chief shortly after Baron was born?

 

Right after the Access Hollywood tape no less

 

It was already known that Trump had affairs and then there was the secret bus tape the was deliberately held by the extreme alt-left media who then revealed the p***y grabbing tape just weeks prior to the election and Trump still won.

So, to answer your question...it wouldn't have made any difference.

 

I think the baby eater is my favorite.

 

Oh sure, I don't know anyone who thought Hillary was peachy keen. And she ran a poor campaign. She said a couple of things (I ain't tellin') that got her in trouble and cost a bunch of votes. Who cost her the election? My vote would be Hillary followed closely by Comey with Russians bringup the rear. When Comey came out with the Wiener emails (proven false) a few days before the election Hill's numbers went way south. That's why the polls didn't keep up.

 

Had she run a perfect campaign (and no one ever does)...given the Comey letter and Russian interference...she still would have lost

 

If the Comey letter made that large of a difference in the election it simply shows that many voters were looking for any excuse not to vote for her.

 

Actually the polls did show Hillary losing, right after Comey said he was again looking into her emails. A situation where even after the Republicans had repeatedly investigated found no wrong doing. It all played into the same propaganda effort.

Also, here is a tid-bit for you. Apparently all the US spies the Soviet Union recruited were conservatives. The type of propaganda that Russia uses is much more effective with conservatives. Which is why the right wing uses it to control conservatives. Which is why the Russian efforts blended in so well with conservative narratives.

 

The polls did not "show Hillary losing, right after Comey said he was again looking into her emails"....

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...rump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html

 

Jeezus, 2 years after the election and they're still obsessing about 'Russian hacking'?

 

The thing I found interesting was that when someone on the forum posted the Facebook Russian posts, many of them were quoted in posts by the righties here.
Scary but interesting.