Because some on the board still deny it..........

Only because of the lack of evidence. Any decent mind would need it, and would never do what you are always attempting to do. Piss on our legs whiles so innocently claiming it is just a nice, warm, summer rain.

Denial when it is based upon a lack of evidence is actually a coherent and rational position to assume. Unlike your own. You are the one in denial. Denial of the need for evidence. You cannot defend such a position of utter nonsense. Which is why you never try.

 

No, they're not idiots and frauds. They just failed to take into consideration the impact Comey would have on the election by making his announcement just days before the election that they were looking into Hillary's email again. Of course, I know you knew that but didn't think to consider it.

 

I would say that is a "no duh" situation. I wonder if there have been any elections in the last 70 years in either Russia or the USA where the other did not try to influence it?

 

No, I think this might be the first time the the head of the FBI had as strong of an influence in the outcome as Comey did. Especially when you consider she still won the most votes.

 

what does Comey have to do with the Russians?

 

The majority of American voters voted Clinton. All the polls were right.

 

Oh, didn't you know? Nothing. That's a different discussion.

 

Not facts, conjecture, unsupported conjecture by people with an obvious axe to grind is not persuasive.

 

The majority of voters, not Americans. Only 1/3 of Americans voted for Hillary.

 

Its almost as bad as the birther movement.

 

yeah and I didn't buy that either. Ot was a waste of time and effort that could have been better used elsewhere.

 

less than that voted for Trump.

 

Some people are still having a hard time coming to terms with their defeat.
"Dimpled Chad" any one?

Sore losers talking crap.

 

Perhaps you've forgotten something.

Senate committee agrees with intelligence community assessment of election meddling, breaking with GOP House investigation

(CNN)The Senate Intelligence Committee's leaders said Wednesday they believed that the intelligence community's 2017 assessment of election meddling was correct, breaking with Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee who questioned the conclusion that the Russians were trying to help President Donald Trump get elected.

"There is no doubt that Russia undertook an unprecedented effort to interfere with our 2016 election," Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican, said in a statement. "Committee staff have spent 14 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft, and analytic work, and we see no reason to dispute the conclusions."
The top Democrat on the committee, Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, said that "after a thorough review, our staff concluded that the ICA conclusions were accurate and on point. The Russian effort was extensive, sophisticated and ordered by President Putin himself for the purpose of helping Donald Trump and hurting Hilary Clinton."
The joint statement comes after former director of the National Security Agency Michael Rogers, former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper sat down with the committee in a closed hearing Wednesday morning about the 2017 assessment.


The bipartisan conclusion from the Senate Intelligence Committee leaders is a sharp break from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee, who disputed the intelligence community's findings that Russian President Vladimir Putin was trying to help Trump.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/poli...igence-community-election-meddling/index.html

I just don't understand how you guys can hold on to the lie that the Russians were not trying to help Drumpf despite overwhelming evidence they were.

 

Glad we aren't a democracy.

 

Where is the proof, not feelings from senators, PROOF.

 

Where do you suppose the IC assessment came from?

Read the full, unclassified intelligence report on Russian hacking here

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...-campaign-influence-u-s-election-report-finds

 

Have you seen the proof?

 

Let's be clear about this. The unequivocal assessment by our intel agencies is Russian attempted to help Don get elected by various means. An assessment the Senate Intel Committee's report concurred with. They based that assessment on forensic evidence linking Russia to bots, to the hacking of the DNC, fake social media accounts, and activities carried out inside the US.

It is cultist's refusal to acknowledge the overwhelming evidence that makes rational, fact based people concerned about the future of the country since we should be able to agree on the available, empirical evidence in our possession.

 

That kind of reply...........that's a sign of desperation and denial.

 

So, no. You have not seen any proof to the claims maid by your masters and you are just following blindly, like a birther.

 

Mark Warner is not the chair. I say good luck to the Russians trying to meddle with the election since I have it on video that Barack Obama promises us all days prior to the election it was not possible and never would happen.

Watch former president Obama lay it on us.

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/335...uring-the-2016-election#fullscreen&from_embed

 

Honestly Bob, that was pathetic.

https://www.scribd.com/document/335...uring-the-2016-election#fullscreen&from_embed

 

So ahead of the election this was done on a whim? Why don't we know why such a FISA warrant was needed?