Equal Benefits for Veterans and Their Same-Sex Spouses Denied By House GOPers

Who cares what somebody's opinion is?

- - - Updated - - -

Everybody makes up their own definition as to what is perverted.

 

Well they aren't, so tough biscuits.

- - - Updated - - -

And failed, as usual.

 

I would think that with DOMA being unconstitutional on the federal level, and don't ask don't tell being repealed, that military benefits would be required to be given equally.

 

Absolutely they procreate! They always have and they always will. The sad and unfortunate belief on the part of right-wingers is that they apparently believe that Gays and Lesbians, just by virtue of being Gay and Lesbian, somehow lose their ability to procreate. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Gay men still produce plenty of sperms that are capable of producing children. Lesbian women still produce plenty of eggs for the same purpose. Many have even had children the heterosexual way but only for the purposes of having children. Others have produced children by having a Gay male donate his sperm to a Lesbian female friend whereby she is artificially inseminated. Others go on to adopt children because Gay men and Lesbians still have the feelings to have children with which to cultivate a family while maintaining their same-sex orientation and not going through the same process as heterosexuals go through each time just in order to produce children.

 

They didn't want us to do that either.

 

Like it or not same-sex marriages, You decide instead of Orwell? You have a strange logic. Eg. If a person flaunt his defect (for example - has urinary incontinence, and brags about it. And also promotes bowel movements in public places), do you think this person is mentally normal?
If not. Why do you think that gays have the right to impose their orientation to society? Still have a lot of mental disorders. Such as zoophyte, necrophilia, sadists ... Cannibals in the end. You also advocate that to allow them to promotion in orientation?

 

No one has claimed gays and lesbians cant procreate. Gay and lesbian COUPLES cannot procreate as only heterosexual couples have the potential of procreation. The fact that my dog and I can hire a surrogate mother to be inseminated with my sperm to give birth to a child, doesnt mean my dog and I can procreate.

 

Procreation is irrelevant to who can marry.

 

Well they can't have it both ways. They can't have their cake and eat it too but then that has been their problem all along that they Do want to have their cake and eat it too. And that is why the Federal Courts are ruling against them right and left on the same-sex marriage issue and will continue to do so.

 

Gay people are not forcing anything on society. And we do not victimize people. Nor are we a disease.

 

Exactly! But it is only the right-wingers who are running scared and shaking in their boots and booties thinking the 10% or less Gay and Lesbian population is going to threaten the survival of the species. How in the world could they? How totally imbecilic a thought that is. But then they appear to not have good thinking or better sense to think otherwise when they talk that way.

 

it's quickly becoming a dead issue. The younger people, that is younger than me, don't seem to have much hang up at all. So it's inevitable.

 

Every time I see this ridiculous I ask for one thing and not one person has ever been able to answer it.

If homosexuality is a mental illness, what is the psychosis?

 

Read here. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils in America/Sodomy/homosexuality_and_psychiatry.htm
And here http://www.healthline.com/health/psychosis#Overview1

 

Interesting. Now maybe you'd like to actually answer his question?

 

How is cannibalism related to sexual orientation?

 

I'm going to put this in nice, small words for you so you can understand, okay?

When boys like boys, it doesn't hurt the boys that don't like boys. The boys that like boys just want you to stop calling them mean words and let them do the same things the other boys can do. People that like hurting people hurt people, so we don't let them hurt people, and that doesn't have anything to do with boys liking boys or girls liking girls.

Does that make sense? I honestly can't decipher most of your post because your english is horribly broken, and I assume that it isn't your native language. I'd like to suggest in the least condescending way possible that you study english a bit more. I'm not even insulting you or being condescending right now.

Finally, I'd like to point out that from what I understood of your post you're literally just repeating yourself. You're comparing queer people, who simply are attracted to different people, to people with serious medical conditions or psychological disorders. That logic doesn't hold up. It's like comparing someone that prefers blueberry over raspberry to somebody that prefers torturing children over long walks on the beach. It's nonsensical, it's completely incoherent.

And this? This isn't even worth taking seriously. This is a complete joke of an argument and I hope one day you can look back on this and be embarrassed that you ever argued so poorly.

Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders are disorders because they impair functioning. They hurt the sufferer and make them lose touch with reality and severely impair functioning. Somebody having such disordered thought that they dress in seven layers of clothing on a 90 degree day cannot be compared to a man being attracted to another man. You not only insult queer people, you also insult the mentally ill by trivializing their struggles and yourself because you look insensitive and illogical.

If you want to classify homosexuality as an illness, please explain how it hurts the so-called sufferer. If you can't do that and still call it a mental illness, then I will consider heterosexuality a mental illness because evidently it is now okay to make baseless accusations of psychosis.

 

His question - rhetorical. Then there does not require a response. (If he is interested in the symptoms, I gave a link.)
But I have another question. Tell me - why Americans, alluding to a certain organ, show middle finger - But Russian, alluding to a same organ, show his hand to the elbow?

 

Nothing in the two links were in any way relevant or responsive to his question. Try again.

I have no ideas what this is supposed to mean.

 

You really do not know what I want to tell you? I do not care who he loves. And as loves. I am against propaganda perversions. Again. I am against the propaganda of perversion. Do you understand?

 

Add another failure to the list.

Neither of those two links listed the psychosis of homosexuality.

So it isn't a mental illness. You have failed to list any psychosis.

 

Running away from it is so much easier.

 

No my question was direct, your link did not list any psychosis.

You question seems a bit ridiculous. What organ are you talking about?

 

Explain how this is propaganda. Explain how this is perversion. Explain why I should care if it's perverted. Explain why your standards of what is and isn't normal should be enforced by the government.

I mean, what's wrong with being perverted? It's a good way to spice up one's sex life. As long as all parties are consenting adult humans, I see no reason to find it unethical.

In addition, I choose to interpret your refusal to address any points I brought up as a silent confession that you cannot refute them.

IN SUMMARY: If you wish to justify this argument, you must first prove why homosexuality is perverted, then why perversion is wrong, then why the government should enforce a ban on perversion.

 

A man who claims that he is Napoleon - a mentally healthy person?
A man who claims that he is woman - a mentally healthy person?
What is the difference between these people?
Except, the first contains in a psychiatric hospital, and the other, for example, sings "Livin 'La Vida Loca."?