Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Going Birther on Ted Cruz: I didn’t want to do it

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by ProgressivePatriot, Jan 23, 2016.

Page 8 of 8
  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope
    well, I actually have US law on my side. you have birther nonsense
     
    rahl, Feb 25, 2016
    #176
  2. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,903
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only thing you have on your side is your own opinion; but there is no substance to it, just your own prejudicial bias. Your every post confirms it.
     
    pol meister, Feb 25, 2016
    #177
  3. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually, I have US law on my side. You have birther nonsense.
    My every post confirms US law.
     
    rahl, Feb 25, 2016
    #178
  4. Penrod

    Penrod Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Messages:
    12,507
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Its not the child but the government of the parent that determines alligance and citizenship. For instance Cruz was a Canadian citizen at birth . Tell me by simply renouncing it a few years back he has no Canadian influence in his life. Again the reason for the war of 1812 was the British taking sailors off our ships because under British law they were British subjects.

    As Ive mentioned many times Congress can make anyone it chooses a citizen. If it takes a stutute to make you a citizen you can not be an NBC

    Its not complicated
     
    Penrod, Feb 26, 2016
    #179
  5. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ok. he has no Canadian influence in his life.
    so what? other countries laws are irrelevant inside US borders.
    to which I've refuted "then there is no such thing as a natural born citizen, as it took an act of congress to create the united states"
    I know. but you're a birther, and therefore impervious to facts or reality.
     
    rahl, Feb 26, 2016
    #180
  6. Penrod

    Penrod Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Messages:
    12,507
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Your wrong. I bet you will claim Obama living in Indonesia and being exposed to Islam had no effect on his thinking.

    So then is US law irrelevant in the borders of Canada? It goes both ways.

    So now you are claiming no one can run for president and that the founders made a requirement that can not be met. :roflol:

    Im not a birther. I never denied Obama or Cruz or Rubio are US citizens at birth. I claim thats not what the constitution requires. Again the vast majority of US citizens are NBCs using the definition I give.
     
    Penrod, Feb 26, 2016
    #181
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct. He lived there for 4 years as a toddler.

    US jurisdiction is irrelevant in Canada. US citizenship laws still apply when they are on US soil.
    No, I'm pointing out how moronic your argument is.

    Of course you are.
    Which makes you a birther. And you have been proven wrong.
    Nope.
     
    rahl, Feb 27, 2016
    #182
Page 8 of 8

Share This Page