Trayvon Martin: DOJ Set to Announce No Charges Against George Zimmerman

Perhaps you can answer.

 

The collection of the evidence and the handling of the crime scene is a good place to start.

I have always agreed that these are questions that the police failed to ask Zimmerman.

Here’s what Politan thinks police should have asked Zimmerman immediately after Martin’s death:

1. Where did you go for two minutes after hanging up with police?
2. Why did you need to get out of the car to find a street address?
3. Why did you say in court that you thought Trayvon Martin was your age, when you described him as a teenager and a "kid" in the call to police?
4. Why did you think Martin was breaking into neighbor Frank Taaffe's house when the person responsible for all of the burglaries in the community was arrested three weeks prior?
5. Which one of Martin’s hands grabbed the gun? And how could he grab it if he was straddling you? And how could his hand slide across your chest to the gun if he was straddling you?
6. How was he smashing your head into the concrete? Did he grab your hair or your ears?
7. Where are the bushes Martin jumped out of?
8. Do you always forget you are carrying your gun?
9. Why were you carrying your gun to Target? Didn’t you get it to protect yourself from the neighborhood stray dog?
10. How close to Martin were you when you were following him in your car?

 

Wonderful.. The trial didnt cover that? The FBI and DOJ didnt have that information? What puts your expertise on the matter over them?

 

I don't recall ever claiming to be an expert, but when evidence was never collected or the crime scene was mucked up from the word go its kind of hard for anyone to put a case together for a trial.

Many people who are experts on the subject matter pointed that out time and time again.

 

Did the FBI, DOJ or Prosecution make the case for that?

 

Make the case for what?

 

I say George Zimmerman should make plans to find a big name attorney to
work pro bono in making the case that his civil rights were violated by
Eric Holder and especially Al Sharpton.Namely how was Shaprton able to within
hours obtain rally permits that stoked and riled-up racial tensions.
There was Nothing about the case that indicated race.Just because a troublemaker
and tax cheat like Sharpton says so does not make it so.Whether Tawana Brawley,
The Duke Rape Case and especially the Central Park jogger case.
Sharpton called the Central Park Jogger victim a " Whore ".And he said it with his
usual crowd of troublemakers right outside a courthouse.

 

Too bad George can't sue that low IQ moron 0bama. He made his ridiculous, inflammatory comment in the jurisdiction of his job but way outside the limits of his job description.

 

Just can't get over it can you, there was no stalking, stalking is a specific criminal act. Zimmerman behaved well within his rights during the entire incident. Martin did not and got himself killed.

And next time you try to relate the events do so honestly and not leave the salient facts and details of what occurred before Martin got himself shot.

 

Your premise... Do i need to quote it for you?

 

This whole fiasco is standard Eric Holder. Holder knew from day one there would not be any civil rights charges - there was no case.

The same thing will happen in Ferguson. Simply no case.

 

It does nothing of the because as you also do regularly it is a "lie of omission".

Q:
What is a lie of omission?
A:
QUICK ANSWER
A lie of omission is a lie in which someone deliberately withholds pertinent details about something in order to skew someone else's idea of the truth or engender a misconception. Although a lie of omission is not technically a lie because it contains no false information, it is still referred to as one colloquially because it is deliberately misleading.
http://www.ask.com/government-politics/lie-omission-c9740e1f75e5556c

 

And who looks like the biggest fool? Obama who attempted to prejudice the case and injected himself into it. According to him his son would be a little punk who got to arrogant and belligerent for his own good and thought he could attack a white guy and beat him up for "dissing" him and he got himself killed. Really speaks highly our your parenting there Obama.

 

There was nothing wrong at the crime scene, there was nothing wrong with the investigations, neither the police, the FBI or the DOJ, there was nothing wrong with the collection of evidence and there was nothing wrong with the trial.

You lost, get over it. Your positions never held water, not your speculations, not your conjecture, not your specious nonsense in whole matter. All along the way it came out exactly as I had predicted, the evidence I cited and the law as it applied.

So you lost you last desperate effort, your positions are just dust in the wind. The facts are clear. Zimmerman acted legally and in self defense against a belligerent attacker. Zimmerman is an innocent man, the criminal in this matter is no longer with us.

 

I am NOT a fan of using Federal charges to go after someone who has been acquitted, regardless of my opinion of their guilt. Seems like a technicality to get around Double Jeopardy.

 

The real sin behind the entire Zimmerman/Martin fiasco was the attempt by this
Government to make this a cause celebre,exactly as they did in Ferguson.
Meaning Obama and Holder and Sharpton are diligently behind efforts
to Racialize cases in an effort to divide and conquer.Which happens to be
Our Presidents speciality.Whether in Chicago and training ACORN to go out
and cause trouble or Al Sharpton and his type shakedown methods.
It could very well be an attempt to redress what happened in the 40's
and 50's and how Thurgood Marshall was treated by southern white crackers
and bigots.That in the south when the sun went down,Blacks shouldn't be
seen in public or else.This is a sort of payback. That is why all the focus by
Blacks in Hollywood to bring back Slavery,Jim Crow and how blacks were denied
service at white lunch counters.I say Obama and Holder are trying to relive the
past in the form of payback.That is what Trayvon Martin was all about.

 

Race card maxed out. Charge declined. Not guilty.

 

Wonder where Margot and her claims Zimmerman broke Florida stalking and assault laws is to tell us how the DOJ got it wrong. Sadanie too. All that conjecture all those assertions.

 

Yeah those claims were just absurd. Funny how they could not see it then. But then facts do not seem to matter to Trayvon supporters.

 

Time for liberals to cut up their race cards. They are maxed out and will not be honored.

Face it libs if the race pimp Holder says he cant convict on the evidence, that means the evidence is overwhelming against a conviction.

Now the question is---------will the other race pimps Sharpton and Jackson try to stir the pot?

 

He was clearly a criminal. he committed a criminal act when he attacked Zimmerman. There was no stalking. Clealry we know the facts and you dont. No doubt you beleive the police ordered Zimmerman not to pursue.

 

Funny how not one of the Martineers can tell us at which point Zimmerman actually committed a crime.

They cant prove anything.

Stalking is a crime. They cannot prove Zimmerman fulfilled the action so they lie

They lie when they say Zimmerman was ordered not to pursue

Their entire argument is based on lies and conjecture.

 

Sorry Mr. Expert on the case, but many law enforcement folks disagree with you.

I know all the crime scenes that you have processed that you know more than the folks above do.

Actually his parents lost because a coward with a gun was allowed to murder their son and get away with it.

You only did what everyone else did give your lame ass opinion.

I wasn't surprised by the outcome by no means because we have seen it many times before. Mannie Till went to her grave with the lost of he son's murderers never been brought to the Bar of Justice. See in the case against Roy Bryant and JW Milam the evidence was cited and the law as it applied let them walk out the door and the same thing happened in this case. There is a saying, "you will reap what you sow" so your hero Zimmerman's day is coming.

- - - Updated - - -

Just take it for what it is. Zimmerman the hero of racist got away with a crime most of you wish you could commit.

 

Defending yourself isnt a crime. Get over it. You are wrong. The DOJ was gunning for him and could find NOTHING. The only "racist" was the fool saying "creepy ass cracker" and that would be Martin. Other cases have nothing to do with this one. The President spoke about. "My people" Eric Holder could find nothing. The FBI could find nothing. You have NO case so all you are left with is flamebait like "got away with a crime most of you wish you could commit."

Lesson learned dont assault people. Learn from it.

 

congrats on being first to deny a verdict you didn't like and present your agenda driven bias in what you think happened, but could not, and was not proven in court.