Views on Elizabeth Warren and why?

There is a valid reason for that. Utopians believe any lie is justified for forwarding their big government utopian views. Theirs is a religious view of good and evil and non utopians are evil. Just listen to their rhetoric.

 

Why are YOU PEOPLE so afraid of anyone who is working for positive change in our country?. How much mileage do you think that you will get out of this Cherokee stuff?

 

One man's positive change (progressive utopia) is another man's tyranny.

 

It isn't like we can expect the other party to have enough Faith, even to faithfully execute their own, Republican Doctrine.

Where is there any expressly declared power to wage wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror?

 

I'll take the tyranny of government regulation over the tyranny of the banksters and corporate war lords

 

Yeah, the progressive ideal, big government bureaucrats picking winners and losers.

 

You are actually choosing both. Warren supported Dodd Frank which legitimized and set up a system for "too big to fail."

 

The progressive idea is to level the playing field and promote social and economic justice. We know who the winners and losers would be if Bishop Willard had been elected

 

Yeah, the progressive idea is to use force of government to run the economy and the people to move them towards their utopian ideal no matter the cost, no matter the oppression.

Utopia - an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.

 

Well you can continue to misrepresent and exaggerate what progressives want to accomplish. That won't make it true. I'm waiting to be called a Marxist next, along with the president and the entire Democratic party. What's the hold up?

 

Hard to misrepresent what is happening. Progressive are much closer to Marxists than the average American.

 

The allegedly conservative right is even worse with their cognitive dissonance regarding Individual Liberty and coercive use of force of the State.

 

You mean like protecting religious liberty from progressives? What cads.

 

No, I mean we have a Commerce Clause, whence any authority for wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror.

 

So we want to abolish free enterprise, have the government own and control the means of production, and wait for the state to "wither away" and leave it to the proletariat in a utopian paradise free of greed and competition.? To each according to their need and from each according to their abilities? Geeeezzzz I didn't know that!! Holy (*)(*)(*)(*)!! I'll have to rethink my affiliation

 

We kept hearing how Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann were
both such wingnuts.Of course consider the source.The source were those
very same who try and prove how smart and sane those like Hillary are.
Hillary's foreign affairs were disasterous attempts,proving her incompetence.
Like how she promised upstate New Yorkers thousands,hundreds of thousands
{ 200,ooo } of new jobs.A couple years into her senate seat we find out that
Upstate new York LOST over 30,ooo jobs.
Then there's all the Hillary shrilling addresses or her laughing at such things
as Gaddafi being assassinated { we came,we saw,he died ... chuckle chuckle !}
Then the laughing over how she defended a child rapist.
The real wingnuts are Big Liberal nutbags like Hillary and Elizabeth Warren
and little Barbara Boxer.of course Maxine Waters et al.
This is just how Liberals roll.
They actually think it possible to make a silk purse from a sows ear.

 

I don't see any evidence here that her claim is false.

In any event, it's hardly consequential.

If that's all you've got to go in, it isn't much.

You have not adressed a single thing that she has said or a single thing she has campaigned on.

 

How shallow and sexist is it that Dems aren't even considering anybody but a woman. It's like, "OK, we had our black and that was a disaster. Next is a woman. After that, maybe a gay midget."

It's all about skin color, gender and sexual preference to lefties. They don't see anything past that criteria.

For an example... see the first sentence of TomFitz post above.

 

I like Warren and would back her for president, but an equally ideological white male would really help the democrats in 2016. Obama has really left the right wing with a distaste for anyone but at this point.

 

And Republican's aren't considering anyone besides a while male.. Why is that better. At this point, it's not about who the party is willing to consider, it's about who is willing to step up and it's about where the talent is.

 

well said - but politically a southern, white, liberal Democrat has the best chance

 

Democrats can't see past skin color or gender to recognize talent. Obviously.

Who said Republicans aren't considering anyone besides a white male?

 

well, if you liked Pres O, vote for her. I am thinking most of America is not much in Like Mode, however

as another poster said, she is a moron on economics, READ: anti-business

that's all we need is more businesses going overseas because of (even higher?) taxes... These lefties are DESTROYING our country. Pretty soon we will be indistinguishable from the socialist coiuntries of Europe... maybe worse


______

 

maybe i am a little too misogynistic or something but i think it should probably be West Palin...

for one thing, the Bible says that women should not have authority over a man.. This is mostly for the Church, probably (?) but stil....

Even so, i would love to see one or the other...



____

 

yes, but you didn't even mention all of Hillary's LIES. True, you would need a ream of paper's worth of posts... but... Are we so used to hearing lies that we don't even bother noticing that anymore? Scary...

Hillary or Warren... Stalin or Lenin???


what's the diff?



____