Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay marriage, starting at 4-years-oldl

Yeah einstein, thats why I said "There is no contradiction between nationalism and socialism. The Communist were the ones dreaming of ruling the world[/quote]

 

That would be the linked to story in the opening post, that you havent read, and yet were compelled to run your mouth about.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/l...-kids-to-accept-gay-marriage-starting-at-4-ye

 

[/QUOTE]

Good, then you'll have no issue with American nationalists being labelled 'socialists'.

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Lineage_of_American_nationalist_organizations_and_individuals

 

None at all. Not sure of your point.

 

I don't thinks pre school kids notice things like that. And if they did, some things are the responsibility of parents. Do you want to take away all responsibility from the parents and hand it over to activists in the schools?

- - - Updated - - -

It's the dream of every parent that their child grows up and is a homosexual.

 

No, but what I don't want to see is kids being allowed to bully or attack children just because they have homosexual parents. And yes, children do notice.

 

you don't have to preach social issues to prevent bullying. I have created a safe environment in my classroom without saying "Billy has 2 daddies" (and we do have a girl like that)

the social issue of gay has nothing to do with preventing kids misbehaving in class

 

I did read the article I read all of them waiting for the anti gay idiots to post something relevant or even remotely honest - the word "open" appears once and there is no source except from lifesitenews. I'm sorry if I don't believe a site with "FREE pro-life and pro-family news" and donate now to support traditional marriage. They have proven to be less than honest in the past and due to that have become a favorite source of information for those that want biased information.

I was asking for an actual source (accredited, non biased, or institutional). I researched and found 0 results except from pages - all "pro-marriage" (except for gays) - that also linked back to lsn.

So do you have an actual source or not? Unlike you, I like actual facts - I am not so bigoted that I only accept and reference news that agrees with my current views.

 

so hateful.... why does it anger you so much when people disagree that you are born gay, even though you are unable to provide proof of said gay gene.....

 

Right because NO kids have noticed that and if kids were bullying the girl, do you let the kids then know just how much you disapprove of two gays raising kids as well?

And please tell us what is wrong with saying a math problem billy gets a dollar from each of his dads, how much money does he have? Does billy having two dads suddenly make it a social issue. It is fact there are kids with gay parents so how is that a problem for you?

 

People once were unable to prove that hazardous weather wasn't an act of the gods being angry. Just because there is no "gay gene" found we should make gays second class citizens because you have an "icky" factor for it?

 

Untrue, I think the aids rate in the gay community is staggering and shows the propensity for homosexual men to have risky sex - I do not know how to address it as I have never belonged to that group. With that said, the straight men I know are just as promiscuous as most of the gay men.

Aids rates currently composed at a cdc rate of 93% for males, 63% for homosexuals, and 34% for African American males. In some areas of the country 1 in 7 admitted male homosexuals have aids while 1 in 3 African American male admitted homosexuals are infected. All of these are statistically alarming but only one is focused on by individuals, like yourself, attempting to satisfy an agenda.

Facts are facts, what do you suppose we do about it besides denying them an institution that has shown to increase monogamy. Maybe they just need to be stigmatized more?

 

have you been fired for being gay?
have you been not hired because you were gay?
have you been arrested for being gay?
have you been evicted or denied housing because you're gay?


those are what would have to happen to be considered 2nd class citizen and I would stand arm and arm with you against such acts.


you are allowed to marry, with the EXACT SAME conditions I am. If I was allowed to marry a guy because I'm not really gay, but you were denied.... that's discrimination.


However, I'm not allowed to marry same gender either.

marrying for love is not a violation of rights.

- - - Updated - - -

I agree with you. People who point out that men in general are the riskiest, always refuse to segregate that data into where the real risk lies. Sure, guys lead the world in AIDs...... why is it "homophobic" to point out that it's because of gay men having riskier gay sex?

 

a good teacher can prevent that without having to say "it's ok if they have 2 daddies.... gay is ok"

Trying to add in "from his two dads" is agenda.... why does it have to change from " from his parents" with no mention at all about sexuality. Pure agenda to make sure it's noted "2 dads" in a math problem

 

On two of those, my brother when he was alive WAS fired and not hired because he was gay. That isn't an All-inclusive list of what happens to be a second class citizen.

Oh please, the same excuse used to be used for interracial marriage bans by saying a black male could marry a black female.

Also with SSM being legal YOU can ALSO marry someone of the same sex.

Gender discrimination.

So what are you going to do when it is found by SCOTUS that it is?

And there is nothing wrong with saying that. I'm sure you have no problem saying Christianity is ok.

And what agenda is being pushed? Are you saying there isn't such a thing as two dads? Careful, your homophobia is coming through.

 

You got a link for that?

 

Marriage limited to heterosexual couples no more makes gays second class citizens, than it makes closely related couples 2nd class citizens.

 

Good thing your point will be IRRELEVANT very soon. Deal with it.

 

govt endorsement no more makes something "right" than it made slavery "right" back in the day.

 

No, but it makes it LEGAL which gets all the con's panties in a bunch. Cons are (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) anyway.

 

not so much... Christians have always been persecuted, that won't change.... One thing that doesn't happen, for me at least, (I can't speak about others) is I never get ruffled feathers. I'm very Vulcan in my behavior. me not getting mad or angry, drives others more nuts than the fact two gays get to drive up my insurance premiums....

I hope you and your bf will be happy when you're married.... but, I've never wished ill will on any gay couple, despite disagreeing with the fact that you believe you were born gay.

 

LOL "persecuted". Only in con lala land is not having the right to discriminate against a gay couple, persecution. That's funny, tell me another joke along with your "Vulcan" mentality

I am touched that you think of myself as an attractive male to have a boyfriend, but I'm happily married to my wife. As for not wishing ill on any gay couple, no you don't do that outright. Instead, like most cons, you hide behind your legal battles to try and prevent their freedoms like many cowardly cons do.

 

Actually, the only thing that makes the exclusion of closely related couples discriminatory under the law, is the inclusion of gay couples.

 

I always find it amusing that those who are most animated about preaching that gay is ok.... are the first to be offended by being mistaken for gay, and the quickest to deny they are gay. Meanwhile, SEC is accused of it daily on here.... and he has yet to dignify that with a response.


How very openminded of you.

 

Then you take of bullies when that situation arises. Kids bully others for a multitude of reasons.