A Kentucky woman who accused Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of rape has been referred to the Department of Justice after she admitted that she lied. The woman, Judy Munro-Leighton, took credit for contacting the office of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as "Jane Doe" from Oceanside, California. Jane Doe claimed - without naming a time or place - that Kavanaugh and a friend raped her "several times each" in the backseat of a car. Harris referred the letter to the committee for investigation. "They forced me to go into the backseat and took 2 turns raping me several times each. They dropped me off 3 two blocks from my home," wrote Munro-Leighton, claiming that the pair told her "No one will believe if you tell. Be a good girl." Kavanaugh was questioned on September 26 about the allegation, to which he unequivocally stated: "[T]he whole thing is ridiculous. Nothing ever -- anything like that, nothing... [T]he whole thing is just a crock, farce, wrong, didn't happen, not anything close." The next week, Munro-Leighton sent an email to the Judiciary committee claiming to be Jane Doe from Oceanside, California - reiterating her claims of a "vicious assault" which she said she knew "will get no media attention." Upon investigation, the Judiciary Committee investigators found that Munro-Leighton was a left wing activist who is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh, who lives in Kentucky. When Committee investigators contacted her, she backpedaled on her claim of being the original Jane Doe - and said she emailed the committee "as a way to grab attention." https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...-referred-criminal-prosecution-kamalas-office Two out of three down and number three's witness doesn't remember anything like that happening. She doesn't remember when or where it happened. Doesn't even remember how she got there or got home. I would say that is three out of three down.
Whether there is a 2nd, 3rd, 4th or more women making claims against Judge Kavanaugh has no bearing on the claims made during the judge's hearing. Going forward...each new claim should be investigated. A thread to announce no evidence found seems a bit much.
No, it's proof dems used people to try and circumvent the process of advise and consent in the nomination of a judge that was already nominated and confirmed once before to the lower appeals court. In that phony process, they have possibly destroyed real victims of rape attempts to bring their plight to the light, meaning they won't even try. Dems are disgustingly corrupt and need to be wiped off the political map. Steve
Kavanaugh is a good example of how facist Democrats try to destroy people they disagree with and how your average Democrat drone gives them all a total pass. Democrats can invite a subordinate to their office. Drop their pants and try to have sex with her. When she gets mad and Sue's, dems the use tax dollars to bribe the victim into silence and everyone involved gets a total pass. When it comes to women and sexual assault. Don't let Jon Conyers Democrats get a pass from you...
Well actually it is a thread to announce that vicious liars may well be prosecuted for those vicious lies,
New Senate Report: Evidence Shows Michael Avenatti and Julie Swetnik Criminally Conspired to Take Kavanaugh Down With Lies..... Over the weekend Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley released a 414-page report detailing allegations made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation process. The report not only found that none of the accusations made by anyone failed to include evidence or merit, but that infamous porn lawyer Michael Avenatti and his client Julie Swetnik criminally conspired to take down Kavanaugh's nomination. "The evidence appears to support the position that Julie Swetnick and Mr. Avenatti criminally conspired to make materially false statements to the Committee and obstruct the Committee’s investigation. Accordingly, the Committee referred both to the Department of Justice and FBI for investigation and potential violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371, § 1001, and § 1505 on October 25, 2018," the report states. "In addition, on October 26, 2018, the Committee made a second criminal referral against Michael Avenatti to the Justice Department and FBI for investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (knowingly providing materially false statements) and 1505 (obstruction of a congressional investigation), based upon the NBC story that evidenced that Mr. Avenatti may have fabricated allegations by a second declarant.".....snip~ https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...red-to-take-kavanaugh-down-with-lies-n2535015 Well one thing is certain, Avenatti won't be running for President with his broke ass.
As a result of their actions, going forward, will people be more likely, or less likely to believe such claims?
I think the majority now knows it was a political stunt by the Demos and their activists. Less likely if the Democrats are involved.
So all that is left is to unwind the criminal conspiracy that is ms Blasey Ford. It clearly involves at least ms Feinstein, the Congress critter from ms Ford's home district, the ex FBI buddy in MD, collusion with the HRC organization where the law firm was provided by, and at least the conspiracy of the entire democratic members of the Judicial committee. Maybe this might, finally, give Mueller something to do? Or maybe, it's just time we invited a new SP to investigate and dismantle the conspiracy.
Are you suggesting this negates Schlitz Kavanaugh being a liar? Or is this just an attempt at clean-up by right wing media? https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...dy-munro-leighton-brett-kavanaugh-trump-tweet
No, I'm insinuating all three women are liars and wouldn't doubt for a minute the Democrats paid Ford to do it, as it's pretty obvious they paid for her lie detector test and lawyer. People don't usually forget the big things that happen in their life, but Ford seems to have forgotten everything except she only had one beer and Kavanaugh was the one who molested her and it seems her two witnesses said it didn't happen.
Of course this will never happen because what comes out of right wing rhetoric doesn't square with reality.
You do know you're in a thread where they've discovered a second false accuser, right? But sure, we're the ones with the reality problem. You guys worked free houses yet into your free college education, free health care, and $200 an hour plan yet?
I would like to make a couple of comments or observations. One, if Ms. Munro-Leighton is "decades older" than Kavanaugh, she is in her 70's or 80's and she would have been decades older that Kavanaugh when he was in college or high school. I find it very hard to believe that college guys are going to get some woman in her 40's or 50's into the back seat of a car for rape. She has to be some kind of a nutjob to think that anyone was going to take her seriously. I am actually surprised that the intense publicity did not attract more false claims. Also, I am not at all surprised that the Senate Judiciary Committee referred Avenatti and Swetnick to the DOJ. Hopefully, the DOJ is reliable and trustworthy. I think that the Senate Committed is political and not reliable or trustworthy. If they are guilty, I hope that they are properly punished. If they are found innocent, I think that every negative poster should apologize.
