A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Once AGAIN, not seeing the plane doesn't mean it wasn't there

 

What kind of technology would allow that, as well as 'fooling' thousands of people on the scene and millions of people watching the event live on television?

 

The eternal destruction of failed stupidity

Some desperate goofer tried to prove the fake plane real and found this footage showing what's supposed to be a plane from the wide western view. This apparently is from the same youtube account but was uploaded closer to when those videos were released under FOIA.

It first appears as some faint grey thing and quickly morphs into a horribly fake black plane in the following 8 seconds. It doesn't get much better than this. Never try to prove a negative because you'll always lose and provide the truth more weight in evidence.




[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoyWAjVpZzY&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=37]Second Plane Hitting the WTC - YouTube[/ame]

 

The fake planes were facing different directions only seconds before impact. Nothing can change where they were during fake news footage. No 3D view or different camera angles change that two different flight paths were shown on TV. The plane theory falls apart on that alone. The wide angle has it traveling straight and it's irrelevant if it was exactly, only north. The following are all different flight paths.

Divebomb myth is going northeast and a little west before fake impact.LOL

The wide angle does not divebomb but goes straight north into the south facing of T2.

The orb travels east and a little north causing the explosion in the live footage that can never be challenged.

 

'Fake planes,<eyeroll>,come on truthers,you can do better that that!

 

That's your answer?

 

Wasn't that the title of a bad movie?

 

I will debate you anytime, anywhere and you will be nowhere to be found. It's safe for you liars behind your little keyboards and monitors. You'd lose at every point and be laughed at.

 

Your answer is nothing because can't you debate facts, but only ignore them. You have two live clips with no plane and two freaked out women who both clearly did not see a plane which is proven a fact by the clips that show no plane.

 

The fact is, you ignore millions of eyewitnesses in favor of one grainy video.

You dodged the question with typical incredulity.

 

I'm not that strong a debater,but I'll take you on.

And I'm NOT a liar

 

Millions of people saw a fake black plane on TV melt into a building. There were around 100 witnesses and most did not see a large plane. What matters is what people saw on the ground and that's been done by other researchers. Only about 20 percent reported seeing a large plane and only 8 percent saw and heard a plane. Most said small plane or only explosion. The government and media used the same videos and simply lied and said the orb was a jet. It's a big joke and it's on americans. Your defense is one of playing dumb and not seeing reality.

 

No one has ever debated me on jfk or 911. They just say I'm wrong and never defend their positions because they can't prove anything and certainly can't change facts.

 

You can't be serious.

I mean, are you?? Really??

 

No plane was captured in two surviving live clips and that's proven conclusive by neither lady mentioning a jumbo jet approaching the towers. They are the best witnesses because it was filmed live, before, during, and after the explosion. Their initial reactions prove the footage is legit showing an unknown flying object..

 

Tower one and tower two WERE hit with planes. Too many videos of that fact. Had they hit in a minute of each other, they could maybe fake planes. Planes are abundant, and people flying them are expendable. No reason to fake planes.

Where it does get interesting, is in the flash of light that strikes each tower just before impact.

It is clearly visible in every camera that had that an angle to the shot. Tower one and tower two both had a flash of light.

I am a truth activist, and there is not truth in the disinformation that no plane hit tower two. That is false. Now, it is possible, something happened to the structure before the plane hit, that let the soft plane completely enter the tower, and even exit with an intact nose cone? I believe so, the evidence points to this fact.

The evidence also points to something of like nature happening at the pentagon. Something punched a perfect round hole the size of a firetruck in the fifth concrete ring. No normal jet plane did that. What did?

 

Low resolution video, of fast moving objects, or even slow moving objects, clip details of the object. Leaving the object looking different than it was in fact.

Basing a conclusion of these objects as to what they were, or what it was, just is not good science.

Now do I have proof the planes they say hit these buildings, are the ones that hit the buildings? No one does. It is clear, the day was full of trickery, smoke and mirrors.

Planes hit the towers, but we will never know positive ID on them, in my opinion.

 

Kudos to your "open mindedness". Glad you're still undecided..

 

About a UFO being involved?? C'mon. YOU don't believe that do you? I mean, you do concede that planes hit the towers, don't you?

I'll admit that many of the scenarios that you have cited may be plausible, but do you seriously think that a fake plane was added to EVERY piece of video that news cameras and amateur videographers alike recorded that day?

And that NONE of them would have publicly claimed that their video was edited?

 

another fish story from the usual crowd

 

of course they did! LMAO

​

 

I know the "official" presentation of what happened on 9/11 is utterly false. That's all I am 100% completely sure of. Glad you've figured it all out already though. Kudos.

 

I don't recall stating that I have "figured it all out already".

And you didn't answer my question . . . do you or do you not concede that planes hit the towers? Regardless what you may think actually caused them to collapse.

 

Planes appear to have hit 2 of the 3 towers that collapsed. One tower NOT hit by any plane collapsed anyway, and another one in Washington partially collapsed that no plane ever hit.
As for the first 2, I'm still somewhat open to possibilities. Good day.

 

LMAO This is the funniest thread in all of the conspiracy theory threads! Are you telling me, the day everyone in the entire world had their focus FIXED on the world trade center the government SOMEHOW tricked people into believing something that didn't happen?! Are you (*)(*)(*)(*)ing kidding me?

That's not just stupid. That's insane. There is no point bringing up the countless home video recordings of the 2nd plane hitting. Or the, literally billions of people who were either there or saw it on live TV. There is no point to it because you're insane. This isn't a debate thread. It's just another reason we shouldn't allow patients at mental asylums access to the internet.