Barr authorizes Justice to probe 'substantial allegations' of voter fraud

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Bluesguy, Nov 9, 2020.

  1. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,903
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
  2. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,903
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does it matter to you which of the three were used in SC? Any of the three could be compromised, or all of them.
     
  3. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,884
    Likes Received:
    8,847
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What? Your lying headline was "Democratic senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election" It certainly does matter given you posting the lies from Washington Examiner and Trump's constant lies about Dominion switching votes
     
    clennan likes this.
  4. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,402
    Likes Received:
    15,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LMAO...I keep telling you people that everything trump touches turns to ****.

    https://www.axios.com/trump-election-challenges-loss-biden-fb42c9df-485d-4494-aeb2-6b2acadeb32a.html
     
    clennan likes this.
  5. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,102
    Likes Received:
    39,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    yabberefugee likes this.
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,102
    Likes Received:
    39,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I person swearing to what they personally witnessed is NOT hearsay. It is present to the judge to bring to trail. Then the person gives their testimony in the trial unless for some reason they cannot attend and the judge can rule to accept the affidavit just as a deposition. The rest of your bromides and platitudes are not worth responding to I care not about you attacking Trump. This is about the integrity of this election and our future elections. There is a legal process so calm down and let it proceed. If the election was a pure as the driven snow then so be it. If not then we need to start fixing things and so far I see a LOT of things that need to be fixed.
     
    yabberefugee likes this.
  7. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,070
    Likes Received:
    9,459
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FFS, did you read what I posted?

    An affidavit is nothing but an accusation. Nothing more, nothing less. There HAS TO BE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT.

    In rightwinglandia today, an accusation is as good as evidence. Someone says “i saw a guy hold up a ballot, and then he put it down on the table, so he must have cheated on it”, and the right wing in this country is ready to throw democracy out the window.

    Since the first day of this election, everything has been a conspiracy against Trump in rightwinglandia. Someone makes an accusation, and you and the rest of the cult swallow it, and it just becomes a fact. No evidence needed, the accusation is enough.When they started counting the mail in ballots the day after the election, rightwinglandia was screaming that “they are counting ballots after the election, so they must be fake”, and then “well its odd that they keep finding ballots for Joe Biden”. And then yesterday in Georgia, during the hand recount they found some 5000ish ballots for Trump on a memory card, and oddly enough, that was “Democrats tried to hide them”. It’s fascinating to watch, while at the very same time scary as hell because the right in this country is actually degrading and denigrating the core of our democracy, which is free and fair elections.

    So show your proof. Your so sure its stolen, show your proof. Rightwinglandia has had almost 3 weeks now to show it, and they have absolutely ZERO evidence. If they had it they would be in court right now. But instead their staying in front of a snapper lawn tractor in jersey pushing more conspiracy.

    Show the proof or its just another conspiracy.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2020
  8. nobodyspecific

    nobodyspecific Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    747
    Trophy Points:
    93
    The hand recount of paper ballots for Georgia is done. https://www.npr.org/sections/live-u...georgia-the-last-state-to-be-called-by-the-ap

    The social media claim of 20K Georgia votes being switched by Dominion software did not materialize. Not that it will be meaningful in convincing you. I'm sure the re-counters were properly trained to know exactly how many dominion votes were switched per county. Since the next recount the Trump Campaign will request will be done by machine, those machines will need to be rehacked to give basically the same result per county. Couldn't be simpler.
     
  9. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,402
    Likes Received:
    15,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bullshit, total bullshit. It’s all about trump and his malignant narcissism and how he is actively trying to damage the country out of spite and how his cult is willing to throw our country under the bus to pander to him. It’s shameful and probably treasonous.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2020
    clennan likes this.
  10. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,903
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As you know, a paper recount isn't going to pick up software fraud. Neither is there any reason to believe that the "re-counters" of paper ballots were properly trained to detect software fraud.

    Here in NV, I actually voted on a digital touch-screen computer. No paper receipt, or receipt of any kind, was given to me as proof of my vote. It all ended up in the digital system. So all the guy on the receiving end had to do was to switch my "software" vote from Trump to Biden, and wah-la, Trump loses one vote, and Biden gains one vote.

    That's how the computer software hacks were able to steal this election from Trump, and give it to Biden instead.
     
  11. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,653
    Likes Received:
    32,391
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :roflol:

    Nothing was STOLEN.

    That said. I am surprised that Bat Boy doesn't have lawyers in Nevada.

    Now that I think about it...

    That's how the computer software hacks were able to steal this election from Bat Boy, and give it to Biden instead.
     
  12. pol meister

    pol meister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,903
    Likes Received:
    2,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't know what bat boy is. My mother weaned me from worthless cartoons when I was 8 years old. Went to baseball cards instead. How old are you AJ? Seven?
     
  13. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,884
    Likes Received:
    8,847
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've got a good idea. Paper postal votes is the way forward LOL.

    But wait, in a different thread you were maintaining that Dominion ballot machines were switching votes. But Nevada used Agilis ballot sorting system. So there must be a massive conspiracy going on with all manufacturers of voting machines
     
  14. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,653
    Likes Received:
    32,391
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yup.

    "Massive Fraud"... EXCEPT where Trump and the GOP Won.:roflol:
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2020
  15. Phyxius

    Phyxius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Messages:
    15,965
    Likes Received:
    21,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots; Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any misconduct in connection with the challenged ballots; Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any impropriety in connection with the challenged ballots; Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any undue influence committed with respect to the challenged ballots.”
     
  16. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,760
    Likes Received:
    9,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    An affidavit is evidence under penalty of perjury for the one submitting it. That is a far cry more credible than unidentified whistleblowers that Democrats have based their challenges on for the last four years.
     
  17. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,102
    Likes Received:
    39,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh stop with the over the top hyperbole if anyone tried to damage the country it was the Democrats starting the moment he announced his candidacy in 2016 and go educate yourself on what is treason else declare Gore was engaged in treasonous acts in 2000.
     
  18. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,102
    Likes Received:
    39,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    OK no tabulation errors, what does it have to do with voter fraud and illegal ballots?
     
  19. Phyxius

    Phyxius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Messages:
    15,965
    Likes Received:
    21,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why are Trump attorneys explicitly saying there was no fraud in court?

    [​IMG]
     
  20. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,070
    Likes Received:
    9,459
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No its not. Its absolutely no different except one of them makes a claim in front of someone who "validates" that the claim was made
     
  21. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,653
    Likes Received:
    32,391
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Very good question.

    So many "talking points" being so easily debunked.
     
    Phyxius likes this.
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,102
    Likes Received:
    39,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What's the lawsuit about and I don't care about their court filings let them go where they may. I more concerned with future elections and dealing with the problems we saw in this one which was certainly open for fraud.
     
  23. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,102
    Likes Received:
    39,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    These are sworn and signed statements to notary, an agent of the court and it is against the law to sign a false statement in front of a notary. It is considered perjury.

    "An “affidavit” is a written statement that is considered made under oath. It is only valid when made voluntarily and without coercion. When you sign an affidavit, you are asserting that the information is true and that you have personal knowledge of the facts contained in the affidavit. By signing, you are also stating that you are competent to testify if called into court about the information provided in the affidavit."
    https://www.legalnature.com/guides/what-you-need-to-know-about-using-affidavits
     
  24. Phyxius

    Phyxius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Messages:
    15,965
    Likes Received:
    21,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    These affidavits?

    Trump's 234 pages of 'election fraud' affidavits REVEALED: Statements include poll watcher who says he thought military wouldn't vote Biden and that 'independent' watchers were liberals 'because they wanted to work in Brooklyn'

     
  25. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,070
    Likes Received:
    9,459
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reading comprehension......

    FFS....
     
    Phyxius likes this.

Share This Page