Hah, nice deutschey comments. Pedophilia is next!! Yep! You pedophiles. We know that's what you wish. *wink* *wink* On to topic, in comics there have been various gay characters in the last 2-3 decades. It's usually kept to adult comics, mangas or just not brought to lite. A lot of relations go on in comics, so no surprise here.
Your opinion is noted but doesn't address the fact progressives are claiming marriage is a "right" And there are plenty of gay couples or any couple for that nature that has victims.
When you declare something is a right you can't limit it without infringing on the rights of that group arguing for equal treatment. You are using your own personal morality to judge whether a relationship is moral making you no different than people who are against gay marriage for the same reason.
Of course we can. We declare voting, free speach, and even freedom as rights. We limit them all. What we don't do is limit them without good reason. There's a reason society needs to deny the right to marry to folks who are unable or unwilling to consent. To date, no one has provided a reason why society must deny marriage to a same sex couple.
So you are no different than those against gay marriage. You want to limit your new freedom to couples you like.. So stop pretending you support freedom for everyone because clearly you don't. No law has ever been based on the fact you don't think there is an argument against gay marriage. You want to change the law. It is up to you to present your case as to why we should allow for gay marriage and specifically only 2 person adult gay marriage. Go ahead. No one on your side has ever accepted this challenge.
Then don't pretend you are any different from people who are against gay marriage. You don't support freedom for everyone either.
What exaclty is the difference between the choices involved in racial and sexual preference? Why is one protected and the other not?
I support freedom for consenting adults, which by the way means I am more pro-freedom than you and the rest of the Christofascists.
One is a proven genetic trait. The other cannot be proven to be anything more than a choice conscious or unconscious. Why would we open marriage contracts up to accommodate choice?
No you aren't. You only support certain types of freedom YOU like. You are no different than the ones you accuse of hate. But cheer up. If you keep up the hate attacks perhaps another one of your lackeys will shoot up another conservative group.
No heterosexuality is a proven genetic trait as is race. Please, try and argue against it. Embarrass yourself.
I support freedom for all consenting adults. How are you more pro-freedom than I when you would place far more restrictions than I would?
But marrying someone of another race is a CHOICE. What makes that choice protected and choosing to marry someone of the same sex not?
