Congress will see Barr's redacted version of the Mueller Report

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Sandy Shanks, Mar 29, 2019.

  1. Sandy Shanks

    Sandy Shanks Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    Messages:
    26,679
    Likes Received:
    6,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Members of Congress are entrusted with top secret military intelligence. They are entrusted with the most important information regarding our nation's security. They are responsible for funding all military operations and projects throughout the world. They need top secret intelligence so they can do their jobs.

    Barr is telling Congress that there are matters within the Mueller Report that are too sensitive for their eyes?

    I need help from Trump's supporters. Please tell me why our representatives in Congress are getting Barr's revised version of the Mueller Report. Please tell me why our representatives, who see the most sacred of intelligence, cannot see the entire Mueller Report.

    If you answer, they should not, please explain what Barr is trying to hide from our representatives.
     
  2. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now you are just going into conspiracy theory.
     
  3. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm getting into corruption, not conspiracy. Remember, the only issue that trump had with sessions was that he wasn't corrupt enough.
     
  4. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A president can be indicted he just can't be prosecuted while in office.

    And for good reason.

    And that part isn't even true, he could still be prosecuted but he can't be compelled to comply. The Supreme Court said that the president will comply basically when it is convenient
    for him to do so.

    So in essence if you try and prosecute a sitting president he can drag out any procedure as long as he wants.
     
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep. Even Stzrok knew there was no there there and he became part of Mueller’s team.
     
  6. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True Horse Hockey. Stupid claims like this only reflect on your lack of intellect.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2019
  7. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, he left it up to the doj to decide. I don't know if that's what happened, We just don't really know. And, just about any other president in history, the conclusion would be that the investigation found that the president DID NOT obstruct.
     
  8. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He said there might not be. He didn't say he knew there wasn't.
     
  9. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol, is that a game in which you win by making the most rational statement based on the most reality? If so I'm a pretty good player, although there are much better.
     
  10. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have other evidence? Provide it.
     
  11. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No he didn't, that was not his job.

    His job was to bring charges when he found charges about people, especially Trump.

    That was the focus of his investigation. He was also authorized to look into anyone who's name came up during that main investigation which is where he spent the majority of his time meaning that relatively quickly he had cleared Trump of any wrong doing.

    This is why we called it a witch hunt.

    He did not, and wasn't supposed to, punt anything to the DOJ.

    That is just laughable.
     
  12. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If having no evidence or clue is paramount you win.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2019
  13. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't really. Do you?
     
  14. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good one.
     
  15. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As has been said many times, it caught a lot of witches. Other than that, we don't really know other than he didn't exonerate trump.
     
  16. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So basically you are spouting off from ignorance.
     
  17. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm saying that the barr memo didn't say anything other than there is a lot of evidence that trump obstructed justice. But we knew that didn't we?
     
  18. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That was never his job.

    His job was to find collusion, not to exonerate anyone which actually makes no sense.

    Not finding collusion by Trump is exonerating him of collusion.

    And yes he caught a lot of people on things totally unrelated to his mission statement.

    How many did he nail on collusion again?

    Zero
     
  19. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It said no such thing.

    Now you are just making up lies.
     
  20. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think his job was to investigate russian interference and possible campaign collusion.
     
  21. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    After all that investigation, it 'doesn't exonerate him.' That's a pretty strong statement.
     
  22. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    After all that investigation it also doesn't find him guilty of anything.

    That is a pretty strong statement.
     
  23. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Not all of them.

    Pretty sure even President Obama was only told what he needed to know and under Obama the CIA was polititized and the CIA told President Obama what he wanted to hear.

    For ten years Sen. Feinstein's chauffeur was a Chi-Com spy.

    Would you trust Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson Lee or Ocasio-Cortez with a secret ?

    Would you trust a Congressman with secrets who believes by putting U.S. Marines on the island of Guam that it would tip over and sink into the sea ?

    How about Hillary Clinton ?

    Wouldn't surprise me if President Trump isn't told what he doesn't need to know.


    Members of Congress Who Could Never Get a Security Clearance

    Barack Obama :eyepopping: ???


     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2019
  24. Sandy Shanks

    Sandy Shanks Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    Messages:
    26,679
    Likes Received:
    6,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, the best we can hope for is that Americans are smart enough to know that Trump and his hand-picked, extremely biased A.G. are hiding something and Trump is voted out of office, assuming he is even the candidate in 2020.

    Many of Trump's friends think this all about impeachment. In fact, they are hoping for impeachment. Nothing could be further from the truth unless the evidence against Trump becomes overwhelming and bipartisan.

    No, what Trump's opponents want is a crippled candidate, crippled by accusations, crippled by the truth, crippled by multiple attempt to hide the truth.

    They don't want to run against a martyr, which is what would happen if an impeachment failed in the GOP Senate.
     
  25. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,469
    Likes Received:
    11,246
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Is Mueller hiding something also since he is helping Barr?
     

Share This Page