Father dragged out of woke school board meeting - daughter was 'raped' by trans in Girls' Room

Have you ever seen a gay person fired, expelled or cancelled for making a joke about a straight person? In CA gays call straight people breeders like we're some kind of horse or something.

 

Too many schools and other institutions just take someone's word for what they say they are. They want to believe and they don't demand proof.

 

Unfortunately, the op turned that into a political football to attack transgender people. Your beef is with him or her.

 

Lol…you wish.

 

Go ahead... share the posts and statements by the OP that were purely political to attack transgender people.

Note: I am that OP.

 

It’s true and no one ever got fired or cancelled for using that offensive, hurtful and heterophobic slur.

 

If Mrs Woods has a proper background and properly trained what's your problem with her protecting children from being killed?

 

60 parents went to the school board meeting last night to express their outrage regarding the incident, and no one on the school board denied it. A spokesperson claimed that the incidents were “reported immediately to the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office, and LCPS cooperated fully with the investigations.”
And you can still convince yourself it never happened. Beautiful demonstration of the detachment from reality required of the liberal mind.
Parents Come out in Force: Demand Loudoun County School Superintendent Resign for Alleged Rape Cover-Up – RedState

 

I didn't see it that way. Reads how the insane system has allowed this sort of thing to happen.. Then again, unlike you I didn't focus so much on the post creator and more to the scenario and what happened to a young girl..

 

You know Joe, topic be damned, torpedo the post creator

 

????? Some idealistic view of all trans people that believes they are not capable of rape? Absurd.

 

I see where you went wrong. Trans people can't rape anyone. That's why they are allowed to use the girl's bathroom. This father was trying to upset the liberal agenda. Therefore, he had to be removed.

 

Properly trained LEO's from time to time don't run into an active shooter situation, and they have had years of training, yet you believe Mrs Woods will react like John Wick with a few days at the range and a sidearm.

 

Yes she being a military veteren or former law enforcement or having taken proper training could protect the children under her care.

 

I was actually shocked in this thread to see that the Leftists put their agenda above the safety of girls. Very few of them had any empathy for the raped girls or their families.

It's pretty sick.

 

You made a definitive claim that isn't true. I gave you an example that disputes your claim. If you still want to make that claim you're going to have to take it up with the group(s) that disagree(s) with you. I'm just providing data here. Rapists don't align sexually with the standard practice of sexual encounters. That should be obvious.

Sex as a practice in prison is not the same as sex as a practice in gen pop. Some of the guys are using it to assert dominance as a strategy to promote security, and some submit to it for similar reasons. Rapists rape for all sorts of reasons. Not just for sexual gratification. For many in prison it's an expression of dominance, ownership, or submission to ownership. The punk doesn't hand out sexual favors because he's attracted to men. He does it because it keeps him alive. Similar reasons apply to the one that pitches. It's a screw or be screwed mentality that is completely disconnected from sexual alignment. It's not about showing affection for someone. It's a display of aggression.

On the subject of the topic, it's entirely possible that this bathroom kid rape was a display of aggression. What if he wanted to punish the girl for being what he cannot be? What if he was mad at her, not attracted to her? (as a hypothetical example) It's also entirely possible that he's actually sexually attracted to women and saw this as a strategy to gain sexual pleasure.

The thing is, our society cannot objectively prove either case.

The truth is all locked in HIS head. These claims that he is trans or isn't trans are all irrelevant. His thoughts can't be proven. All that can be proven are his behavior. There's no scale that you can weigh someone on that tells you how much trans they are. Anyone can just simply decide it's what they are. So society has to wrestle with that to make laws that promote the most freedom for everyone involved. Just like there's no way to tell someone they aren't trans, there's no right answer that solves the incongruency between what the trans person perceives about themselves and what everyone else perceives. Of course, that doesn't stop us from trying to implement laws that get folks tossed in jail for getting a subjective data point wrong.

 

Ah, so you want all school teachers to have military or LEO backgrounds in order to be employed.

 

It's not a condition requiring medical certification proving you have it. It's not classified as a disorder or a disease. Says so right in the DSM. It's simply a conclusion you can draw about yourself.

There are many such identity conclusions that are made by the individual. An example would be homosexuality. Does that need a medical certification?

 

Quaint 20th century view, back when transgendered was considered a mental disorder. This is the 21st century where one only needs to identify as a different sex to be considered a transgendered. Now it is diagnosis of gender dysphoria that involves medical professionals.

You are thinking of Gender Dysphoria, a medical diagnosis. Being transgendered is an identity. If you identify as a different sex, you are by definition transgendered.

 

The point was that "trans friendly" bathroom policies do not, in reality, facilitate this. This person was going to find a way to rape, and could have gone in the bathroom either way. The better question is why the perp wasn't in jail or at least expelled. But I'm not sure in what Fox fabricated universe you think liberals think being trans, or fluid, or a crossdresser means you can rape somebody and be excused.

 

Is the "DAILY MAIL" trust-worthy?

 

The entire point of the me too movement was to address situations in which you can rape someone and be excused. Could it be a blind spot, at least? Definitely.

In this case the kid was transferred. The alleged rapes happened in two different schools. The first allegations were never forwarded to law enforcement. What were the extenuating circumstances that allowed the events to play out this way?

People here are already complaining that it's a lever to use against trans rights. You don't think the admin knew that?

 

As good as CNN or the U.S. MSM. If you can cite where they were wrong, I'll listen.

 

It's not actually relevant to trans policies though. If somebody excused a rapist to protect such policies, or hell ANY policy that's on them and they should be punished. Teachers and doctors are mandatory reporters of abuse for a reason. If it was about "giving a kid a 2nd chance" I can partially understand, but it was clearly the wrong call and illegal given mandatory reporting. If no mandatory reporters knew, then the 2nd rape is on whoever knew but it's not illegal that they didn't report it

 

Why not?
Is that known?